![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
|
Your thoughts on RSA vs. 964 Widebody M491
Between a 1993 RSA (with all 4 options) and a M491 964 Carrera 4 Coupe, assuming that all being equal in terms of mechanical, mileage, color, condition, etc., how would you rate the two in:
1) Desirability 2) Collectability 3) Liquidity Thanks for your thoughts and insights! ![]() Last edited by GSBC; 07-08-2011 at 02:52 PM.. Reason: added info |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
|
Bump...anyone?
Also, correction...since all 1994 Carrera 4 Coupe's are widebodies, the M491 option is not applicable here. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
The current issue of Excellence Magazine has a brief discussion of the 964 RSA, generally favorable. Personally, I would stay away from a 964 C4 as the AWD is complex, expensive and will ultimately require major repairs.
__________________
George E. www.autoinno.com www.AIRMotorSports.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You will have a much more lively debate if you post these questions on the Rennlist 964 board. I for one would be interested to hear the various opinions about the RSA vs. 964 C4 Widebody.
964 Forum - Rennlist Discussion Forums I would probably pick the RSA over the C4 after having my C4 now for a year or so. I think the rear wheel drive experience is more desirable over the all wheel drive in the 964.
__________________
Brian '73 Carrera RS '71 911S coupe 'Patrick' '16 Cayman GT4 '91 C4 coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
|
Thanks for the replies. Noted on the complexities of the awd and requirement for maintenance. I also agree that the C2 rwd layout may ultimately be more rewarding than that of the awd. Were it not the fact that IMHO, the 964 Widebody (without the large wing) is one of the most beautiful shape Porsche has ever produced, my choice would be simple. I mean, the argument for the Speedsters is the same...ultimately, it's all about the beautiful shape, right?
Anyway, keep the thoughts coming...I'd like to hear from all perspectives. |
||
![]() |
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,592
|
Just one data point, my opinion:
I have no desire for an M491, especially a C4. On the other hand, I have been semi-serious about finding an RSA, but only one without a sunroof- Gotta have headroom for a helmet! I never want a turbo-look car without a turbo. That being said, plenty of RSAs have seen lots of track time, and are no longer pristine. Maybe as more of them get crunched on the track, the garage queens will increase in value. Who knows? |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
|
All good points. Thank you.
I do agree that there seems to be very few RSA's that have not seen major track time, or one that has not been beaten to death. |
||
![]() |
|
Former Options Trader !!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 6,756
|
GS you know my thoughts on this one. Let me know how it turns out.
__________________
Current:88 Guards Red Coupe, 89 Coupe Track Rat, 76 Caddy Eldo Convert. 2015 Aprilia Tuono Wrecked 1987 Targa Guards Red, 2003 Ducati ST4S Sold 1987 Granite Green Targa, 993's, 93 RSA, other 964 coupes, 89 911 Turbo Ruf mods, 90 e30 M3, 07 BMW R1200S STOLEN 94 Speedster |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 7
|
|||
![]() |
|
Non Compos Mentis
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Off the grid- Almost
Posts: 10,592
|
Quote:
Maybe I should just keep racing the lowly 944. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,347
|
RSA is a more enjoyable, sporting car.. but for an everyday car, a Widebody 964 would be my preference. A 964 with all options is just another C2, albeit w/o power steering.
Each are low productions numbers but they appeal to a different buyer obviously. I imagine the RSA as a more "liquid" asset.
__________________
1970 914-6 Past: 2000 Boxster 2.7, 1987 944, 1987 924S 1978 911SC, 1976 914 2.0, 1970 914 w/2056 |
||
![]() |
|