Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > 911 Engine Rebuilding Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 115
Making a short stroke out on 2.0

Has anyone built and short stroke out of a 2.0? I was told you use 2.7 top end on a 2.0 bottom end. I guess this makes a high revving engine. I was looking for someone with this set up to ask a few questions.

Old 07-10-2011, 05:55 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Max Sluiter
 
Flieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 19,644
Garage
That means 2.5 liter short stroke. 90mm pistons and 66mm stroke. The 2.0 already has the shortest stroke crankshaft of any production 911 engine.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance
Old 07-10-2011, 06:15 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Dayton Ohio
Posts: 115
2.5 short stroke

Is this a pretty good set up for a street car?
Old 07-10-2011, 06:18 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Max Sluiter
 
Flieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 19,644
Garage
If you like revving to the moon around town and have short gear ratios, then yes!
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance
Old 07-10-2011, 06:26 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 259
As Flieger stated, 89 or 90 mm cylinders on a 66mm crank gives you a 2.5SS. If you already have the 2.0 case, great you can go with that ( with some work) and if you do not you can go with any of the later cases, 2.2, 2.4, 2.7 with the 66 crank.

I am running a 2.5SS on the street and really like it. Mine is pretty built but I have been in others, you can putt around town just fine but most 2.5s need/should be reved to get the most out of them...... If not why even go short stroke.

Jimmy
Old 07-10-2011, 08:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Danimal16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: I be home in CA
Posts: 7,687
I just got my 2.5 SS back in my 71. This engine is FAR more streetable than the old T engine that it replaced. I have the stock 901 (911) gears in the transmission and went with Mod Solex Cams. This thing is a stump puller. The power band is just a HUGE improvement. I would do it again.

DanB

__________________
Dan
Old 07-11-2011, 03:58 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:53 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.