![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 712
|
Quote:
I've seen cylinder pressure tests of various turbo/SC engines that are making 3 BHP per CI, and IIRC they are roughly around 2300 psi peak. A very quick peak, but a peak none the less. If we use that value as a very rough approximation of our turbo engines, that would compare to our typical 3.3L-3.4L putting out around 600 HP at the crank. Based upon Weissach911's numbers above, looks like we might exceed the total warm clamping force of the Dilavar stud at that HP level? And steel or 17-4PH is the only thing that would hold that pressure level?
__________________
1986 911 Turbo 3.3L, K27HFS, Tial 46mm, TurboKraft Intercooler, 964 Cams, Monty Muffler, MS3Pro Evo, M&W Ignition, Zietronix WBO2 Data Logger, Wevo shifter, coupler and motor mounts. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Phila. Pa. area
Posts: 614
|
Bring it down to ground level
Guys
It seems plain to me that none of the engineering members have enought real info to produce any actual fact based data. The general conclusion of the thread seems to be that if you spend $1000.00 for 24 studs that cost about $5.00 each to produce you may be OK. So my question is if you are running an RSR engine, of 3 liter, and putting out approx 325 hp and you use 2 liter steel Porsche stock studs what will happen. What about using 2 liter fiberglass covered Dilavar studs? Has any normal tight fisted people built high HP engines using stock studs and had no problems. I would assume any Mag case engines would have time certs or something. Come on non engineering members speak up. mike |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Quote:
I'll be using plain 993 steel studs in my 3.2SS race engine build i'm currently working on.
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Phoenix Arizona
Posts: 166
|
I have used the factory steel studs in numerous race/street engines for almost 40 years with no head sealing or case problems, I use 26 lbs of torque--- Ollie's does the inserts on my mag case engines. This list includes (but not all) a very mild street 3.5 w/carbs making 300 rear wheel horsepower, mag case 2.7 making 270, numerous 2.5's making between 260 to 280,and (That I mentioned in a earlier post) a twin turbo 2.5 making 468 to the wheels... none of these engines had head sealing problems and all used factory steel studs because they were available and cheap. I think that Henry's studs would be what I would use if I had to purchase new studs. I would never use dilivar because of the problems I had with the twin turbo 2.5 lifting the heads when I used them and because they break----steel does not break.
aws |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,115
|
Quote:
Also to your point, my understanding speaking with "chris_seven", is the hotter the engine is, steel will clamp harder on the heads than Dilavar since steel does not expand as much as AL (or Mg). This is important on boosted engines like mine. Chris felt the threads in the case should be able to handle the additional forces during this period. We did not discuss Mg cases though. Beings that your studs go all the way into the hole for extra thread engagement, sounds like it shouldn't be a problem at all. Again though, not sure for Mg? Now, what that said, mine were under torqued. I had forgotten I was using 993TT studs and used the torque of the factory 3.2 studs. This led to head lifting and galling of the head to cylinder surfaces. Not good!!! ![]() ![]()
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR P & C's, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, depending on mood ![]() |
||
![]() |
|