![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Anyone running 3.5L 964 cams with CIS
Gents
I'm considering some slight tweaking and wanted to see if anyone is running a similar setup AS A STREET CAR and wanted to get driving impressions. This is 1986 US 930 stock fuel head, lines, injectors, CIS with FrankenCIS managing the mixture via the lambda valve. -3.5L 8:1 compression -964 cams -Lightweight clutch -ported intake possibly as much as 40mm -1.2 bar w/g -twin plug w/ distributorless ign, COP in a wasted spark config -Stock exhaust port -RarlyL8 headers + hooligan If anyone has done anything similar I'd like to head impressions on driveability, and gotchas you ran into, or would-do-it-differently-next-time's. Thanks |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northeast
Posts: 463
|
I'd talk to maybe DC or Web about the cam choice-964 is not ideal for force fed engines.
And I would NOT used wasted spark with COP-the spark at overlap causes reversion that prevents the turbo from spooling efficiently. Course ther's a million possible combinations to ponder!
__________________
Mark www.exotechpower.com 1981 Targa-messed with. 91 C2 supercharged track rat Radical Prosport-irritates the GT3 guys 40 years of rebuilding services |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 7,007
|
FWIW,.....
I've used 964 cams in a Turbo motor quite a few times over the past 25 years and its based on how the car will be used. For street cars, I prefer SC cams in these things. You may have more experience than I do, but I've never, ever gotten sufficient fuel flow into a CIS Turbo motor to safely run 1.2 bar. There is far more to this, however I'd certainly re-think that much boost without running Engine Management to accurately (safely) control AFR's and timing.
__________________
Steve Weiner Rennsport Systems Portland Oregon (503) 244-0990 porsche@rennsportsystems.com www.rennsportsystems.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 11,991
|
The 965 S2 was a 3.3 with 964 NA cams (I had them mapped) and a few other bits. It didn't run 1.2 bar mind you, but made for a very good engine. The cam choice you made will be fine in a 3.5. Not sure about 1.2 bar with CIS, I will defer to Steve here as we don't try to run more than 1.0 bar CIS.
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep www.turn3autosport.com 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3 Last edited by Jeff Alton; 02-01-2018 at 09:06 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,116
|
Quote:
![]() Curious if running sequential would enhance? ![]()
__________________
Cory - turbo'd '87 C3.2 Guards/Blk, 3.4, 7.5:1 CR P & C's, 993SS cams, Borg-Warner S366 turbo @ 1.2-1.5 bar, depending on mood ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Northeast
Posts: 463
|
Tippy, Dont be getting too worried here since turbos aren't as sensitive as blowers.
But, I watched a supercharged engine break belts on a dyno clearly due to the wasted spark setup. But it was a clear indicator for sure. COP is great but I'd strongly advise not using wasted spark if it can be avoided. Gains from sequential vs semi are not a ton-doubt it will help much since at higher RPM events are happening too fast. Stay rich-fats where its at but lean is mean-----
__________________
Mark www.exotechpower.com 1981 Targa-messed with. 91 C2 supercharged track rat Radical Prosport-irritates the GT3 guys 40 years of rebuilding services |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|