|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,418
|
I will never get it.
There is a 89 911 Speedster on BAT right now that is at 106k. It's not a super fast car, it not a particularly beautiful car. Looks like a regular mid year cab. Yeah they made less speedsters but the car is just not different enough that most would even know it was different than a regular cab. If I am paying that kind of money, I would want it to be a standout car.
I get it is whatever the market will pay, I just don't get why. I might pay $30-35k, other than that, I would look for another Porsche. Is it just being able to snub your nose as the regular cab guys/gals? |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dana Point, Ca
Posts: 55,591
|
ok then, go buy a regular 89 cab for your 30-35 and tell us how that goes.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Brew Master
|
I'd entertain the idea of 40K not sayin I'd sell... but I'd think about it.
__________________
Nick |
||
|
|
|
|
least common denominator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: San Pedro,CA
Posts: 22,506
|
This will probably go way over $30K but RE: a recent thread where a pelican was looking at +$100K Ferrari's if I had that kind of money this is what I would be looking at:
https://bringatrailer.com/porsche/930-turbo/
__________________
Gary Fisher 29er 2019 Kia Stinger 2.0t gone ![]() 1995 Miata Sold 1984 944 Sold ![]() I am not lost for I know where I am, however where I am is lost. - Winnie the poo. |
||
|
|
|
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Yes and no. It has the Turbo goodies without the engine.
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,579
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
MBruns for President
|
it has the cut down windscreen - which last I heard was $12,000 to replace - so it's got that going for it
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,347
|
plus limited production numbers.. (had to use up those unsellable turbo cab bodies somehow).. and the name "speedster".
__________________
1970 914-6 Past: 2000 Boxster 2.7, 1987 944, 1987 924S 1978 911SC, 1976 914 2.0, 1970 914 w/2056 |
||
|
|
|
|
Driver
|
Yeah, but the engine's the best of the turbo goodies!
I don't get it either. Limited numbers or not, I'd rather have the lighter 911 cab, or the more powerful 930 cab. The Speedster's the last of the cab variants in which I'd be interested.
__________________
1987 Venetian Blue (looks like grey) 930 Coupe 1990 Black 964 C2 Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dana Point, Ca
Posts: 55,591
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 1,418
|
Your right, I wouldn't because likely a beater at that cost. I guess it's the limited number thing and the goodies. Still hardly justifies in my head but who am I to say. Whatever makes you happy I guess.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Brew Master
|
Which makes it even MORE valuable!
... it's a "classic"
__________________
Nick |
||
|
|
|
|
?
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 30,579
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: los angeles, CA.
Posts: 41,306
|
It sold for $125k plus $5k buyer’s fee= $130k. They have sold for quite a bit more at times, not sure if the market is up or down right now. I don’t follow them.
They’ve always been somewhat collectible since they came out. The problem is that cars like that, “planned classics”, is that all of them were bought to look at rather than drive and most have extremely low miles and just go from auction to auction. No one has ever gotten much pleasure from owning one, you can’t really drive it like a regular car and they haven’t appreciated much. The aforementioned $12k windshield can sort of ruin a blast up the coast, stone chips are a part of life. |
||
|
|
|
|
Fleabit peanut monkey
|
Quote:
https://www.barrett-jackson.com/Events/Event/Details/1989-PORSCHE-911-CARRERA-SPEEDSTER-NICHOLAS-CAGES-65790
__________________
1981 911SC Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Oswego, OR
Posts: 6,096
|
I have always really loved those cars. Sorry. I think they are cool.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Dana Point, Ca
Posts: 55,591
|
I have ridden in this car, it is damn fast.
Last edited by BeyGon; 01-29-2019 at 04:30 PM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,457
|
Subjective I know but I think these Speedsters are the best looking of all the impact bumper car variants. The windshield and flares with no tail is magic. Have gone tailless on the on the M491 for a while now, love the look.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: los angeles, CA.
Posts: 41,306
|
Quote:
![]() Meaningless trivia: I was in acting class w Nick 100 years ago when he was still Nicholas Coppola. Did lots of scenes w him, super nice guy. |
||
|
|
|
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 32,643
|
Denis’ comment about planned classics is an interesting one. The original Speedster became a classic due to its popularity as a race car, it’s basic and lightweight design, and a connection to James Dean. Porsche didn’t make it with the intention of becoming a classic, it just happens to be appreciated as one. The Carrera based Speedster is basically a styling exercise that is nothing special underneath, and it’s really only unique as a showpiece. Sadly that’s the case with many modern “classics”, just another car to impress your fellow collectors and polish in the garage. It all seems rather contrived.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8-8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
|
|
|