Everyone needs to have only EVs...
 

...until something goes wrong

https://www.foxbusiness.com/economy/supply-shortages-could-mean-delays-power-restoration-after-storms

Yup...soon we're all gonna have EV's and soon after this the availability of materials needed to make batteries (and etc.?) will be zilch!

Hey...nothing against EV's and my wife and I are seriously discussing buying one at some point (hoping for a new generation of quick-charge long range batteries before we do this), but I do get a little nervous about whether or not the materials supply and charging infrastructure will keep up.

How about a law that EV's can only be made using solar or wind power for the entire manufacturing process...from mining the raw materials through the production line? Should only be delivered to off the grid dealerships via EV trucks.

The number of cars sold in this country is staggering:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1659802956.jpg

Here are the EV numbers:

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1659803183.jpg

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1659803183.jpg

That is just the US. Anyone see the real issues?

Published 2 years ago but still 100% relevant. A whole bunch of people have been duped...

What's best for the planet?: Buy an older car and learn how to fix it yourself.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/S1E8SQde5rk" title="YouTube video player" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>

If I had only an EV during the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy, I would have been screwed. No power for a week, had to drive for food, water, and to find cell service. Gas was scarce, but we found some.

I'm a hybrid fan, love our Rav4.

The excess generation from our solar panels pretty much covers the charging for our EV. We're still tied to the grid though, so if the power goes off, we can't charge the car. I keep the van mostly with a full tank, though.

The key point is that we're importing the damn things!

Exactly. That's a current problem that is not caused by and has nothing to do with electric vehicles. But somehow it's easier to complain about electric vehicles.

The US needs to go all in on re-shoring (or whatever you call it) and stop the insanity of outsourcing everythjng. I know, I know, easier said than done.

^^^^^this, this and this^^^^^

Less consumer consumption will save the planet and not making lots of new stuff to replace perfectly good old stuff :mad:

And I’ll add the ability to get parts and repair broken things like we used to be able to do.

I am completely on board.

I have no issues with hybrid or plug ins...but imagine the scale of mining and pollution, disposal, to even make a 25% dent in new car demand. The "grid" as currently outfitted would be a mess at that level of demand as well.

I keep cars and trucks a long time...a decade or more. I buy trucks new and hang on. We bought a 2 year-old 4Runner from the Puppy and drove it for over 15 years...same with my daughters FJ Cruiser. 15 years. Tacoma? 17 years. We decided to buy a new 4Runner a few years ago because we got a great deal and we will drive it for at least a decade.

My 2015 Tundra will be the last 1/2 ton I own...135k on it and it is as tight as a wet suit. To replace it would be over $60k...and for what? I think I paid $38k for the one I own and I choked on that.

Sorry for the rant. I pay for maintenance, btw, I am completely out of the work on cars deal because I don't want to. I still have maintenance logs on older trucks and vehicles, hundred of enteries.

Not ever again: Routine maintenance is ridiculously cheap and I, unless it is farm equipment, just won't do it.

Just bought an 05 E55, $21K. Won't buy a new car- expensive, and I believe things need to stay out of landfill.

I also like reahabing cars- win/win.

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1659891462.jpg

Myabe its because the govt doesn't want us producing the transformers that have nasty chemicals that harm the environment.

Gotta at least have the illusion of being poor for when shtf

When the shtf, most people will be poor because their money will be worthless due to hyper-inflation and they won't have access to basic necessities.

Worst of all, Tabs will be running around in the street laughing at you and gleefully saying "I told you so" (sort of like he is proactively doing now but only far worse).

Everyone needs to have only EVs...
 

Ok, let me start by admitting that we have a 2015 Chevrolet Volt (The gateway drug to full electric vehicles). My commuter (1995 GMC K1500 4x4) was killing me monthly in gas….back in 2017 when we bought the lease return. Doing simple bushokie math with the amount of miles driving since 2017, has paid for the car by the amount of gas my truck would have burned. With that out of the way, call me a hypocrite.

The Volt has served my needs well, I don’t have “range anxiety” like I would if it was only electric. Someday we might end up with a full electric but who knows. I do find it funny when EV owners do not realize that one EV has done more damage to the environment (mining, transportation, battery manufacturing, etc, including Li battery disposal) than my 95 GMC with 350K miles has done in its lifetime. All of these EV’s are transported by diesel trucks, ships and trains. So “HOW” are EVs going to save the environment?!?!?!?.

Let’s not even breach the idea of what better way for a government to stop movement by shutting down the inadequate electrical grid we have in play currently. There was a good video on what the loggers are being faced with by running the electric logging trucks in Canada and the amount of power required to charge them and their poor electric grid.

Just sayin,
Cheers


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Congratulations on enjoying a Volt. We've had 3 (his and hers gen 1 when we were both commuting, and a gen 2 now that we're retired). We love them.

Bugs - I think this comment is nonsense - "I do find it funny when EV owners do not realize that one EV has done more damage to the environment (mining, transportation, battery manufacturing, etc, including Li battery disposal) than my 95 GMC with 350K miles has done in its lifetime."

MORE damage??
"mining" is oil extraction. Don't try to tell me there aren't issue with oil extraction.
"transportation." Don't they all have to be transported?
"battery manufacturing" as opposed to engine manufacturing?
"Li Battery disposal," batteries are being reused (they still have a good life as power supplies after the rigors of automotive use). Recycling facilities for totally worn out batteries are ramping up. Batteries aren't simply "disposed of."

Get back to me when you you have 350K on the Volt.

I don't think every vehicle ever has to be electrically powered, but for a segment of the driving public, they make perfect sense. Our way of going about serving those drivers is totally effed up in my opinion. First we need to fix our current electrical grid and then beef it up to handle the requirements of millions of electric cars. Then we need to get serious about how power is generated. We HAVE to go nuclear. Wind and solar are never going to produce enough power for the needs of a nation wide fleet of EVs. Only then do we need to start encouraging the manufacture of EV cars. We are going about this backwards and it is going to blow up in our faces.

I would say lithium open pit mining does more damage than a field of pump jacks (lets not even discuss the use of petroleum solvents and other derivatives). Disposal to third world countries. Plus that interesting argument of new vehicles vs positive impact of just fixing what we have now. If manufacturers and society cared about the environment.... repowering older vehicles over cash for clunkers... but capitalists have to get their cut of the pie.


Politics and ****ed up ideology. America was never great. Just less ****ed than the tsars and dynasties.

More "nonsense":

https://www.foxnews.com/world/myanmar-tragedy-exposes-dirty-underbelly-green-energy

How did you pump the gas without electricity? If there is electricity to pump gas, there is electricity to charge batteries.

I read the item below yesterday. I think the guy is trying a little too hard on some of the points, but the reality is that EVs are the future and most if not all of the anti-EV talking points aren't holding up to scrutiny anymore.

https://skeptoid.com/episodes/4844

This coming from a guy (me) who drives a 1997 Land Cruiser on 35" tires to work everyday. SmileWavy

EVs absolutely are the future, basically assured at this point. The timeline is open for debate however.


In the year 2022, if you are an unemotional robot, the most compelling automotive choice for 95% of people is PHEV.

Team A: EV or Die
Team B: Carbs for life bro
Toyota: A prius prime is reasonably priced and is basically best of both worlds
Team A and B: Shut up Toyota it doesn't have fart mode and is slow.

On a recent road trip to far eastern Pennsylvania we stopped a few of the very large truck stops & gas stations. Hundreds of 18 wheelers and countless cars all get fueled up and bladders emptied. Then get back on the interstate and the traffic was three lanes of vehicles for as far as the eye could see, all burning petroleum. Maybe a dozen electric cars in the lot of them. No electric semis at all.

Maybe someday, but I just can't fathom the energy needed to move all that traffic day after day, all year long. We don't have nearly the electricity available to make a dent in it now.

How does a 100 electric cars and hundreds of semis get charged in short order without a local power plant?

if you are spending more than 50k buying a car, and you arnt buying a model 3 performance pack, you arnt thinking straight.

EVs are just better cars, faster.

fixed it for you.

we truck gas hundreds of miles, everywhere, dumbest system ever.

Trailers are where the mass is.
That is where the assist can be placed. Start. Stop. Start. Stop.
Retrofitting is easy.
It just needs a variable go/stop pedal signal.
It can even use lead-acid....
The key is large capacitor storage to buffer transition with individual battery heat monitoring to prevent failure.
A little push goes a long way in reducing wear on other components.
-----------

In 2006(?) I once tried to patent a 3-rotor electric motor. Damn the "disruptive technology" full speed ahead. No company would return a call. Even the Japanese.

Designed to optimize the electro-magnetic interaction surfaces so that every amp could be turned into kinetic energy and/or every 'wasteful' braking condition could do the same. It will eat anything thrown at it and poop gold. Hybrid with appropriate flywheel mass and PTO to battery/other. No more stuck drill bits with the motor smoking in counter-torque. Even tiny it can turn into a hammer drive when spun up if needed. Every electron accounted for. My idea of near-zero-friction "air bearings" is also known as "rifled bearings" and invented long ago. Just missing is the high psi air/oil injection mode.

Plate configuration is much more efficient than a cylinder motor(think cheater bar and the stuff that built stone monuments in the days before modern metallurgy).

And yet we are in 2022 still being sold stones and told it's the best humanity can achieve. Made to break. Like Inuits are being sold ice.

Steam from cooling towers.

those arnt coal power plants.

and coal makes up 21% of electrical power generation in the USA.

the meme is bush league at best.

When the electricity goes out, there are a LOT of stations have a small generator to run the pumps. Some of the people who run those gas stations have a brain in their head.

Yeah, steam from cooling towers, all those plants put out. That, and unicorn farts

I agree, utter nonsense.

It should read, exponentially more damage

:rolleyes:

You know perfectly well that it takes only a small gas generator to deliver magnitudes more energy out of a gas pump. Which in turn fuels magnitudes more miles driven than could be had with said generator juicing maybe one EV, partially.

A lot of y'all sound like old men sitting on your porches yelling at passers-by about EVs. They're happening whether you like it or not, and they're cleaner than IC engine transportation whether you like it or not. You talk about upstream pollution for EVs as if there wasn't also upstream pollution for gasoline propulsion.

Class 8 trucks, especially long-haul trucks, are a hard case. Realistically I see hydrogen fuel cell range extenders as a strong likelihood, but as far as batteries go, lithium-based power density is marginal because it's really difficult to package it acceptably within things like wheelbase limitations for Class 8 tractors. NMC (nickel manganese cobalt) batteries probably have more promise for that use case. Classes 6 and 7 are easier. I drove an International electric truck today (Class 6, dry van body) and it was very impressive.

Sure sure... and you sound like a guy on the street corner shouting the EV is near!

Seriously though, while both EV and ICE cars have upstream pollution, EV's have much more. But that is not the beef of this topic...

EV's rely on high energy efficiency to offset their horrible batteries. ICE cars have excellent energy density but (relative) crap conversion/thermal efficiency - but that has been changing, and changing much faster than batteries have gotten better.

And then there is infrastructure. The "rapid" charging stations are ridiculously expensive, especially considering how slowly they 'pump' the electrical energy. Sure, gas stations are not cheap, but they have massive throughput from a single pump. - how many pumps are at your local Costco? Are they busy? How many rapid chargers would be needed to compete with that energy throughput? Can the grid handle that?

No one has used PCBs in transformers for years. They are filled with a light oil for free circulation.

BTW, PCBs were a Federal mandate...for safety! And the PCBs are not dangerous. Just the Dioxin contamination. Like Agent Orange...

there are 3 gas stations on the same corner of the street 4 blocks from my house.

what the actual **** kind of argument is "EV infrastructure is too expensive"

insane.




we are going to switch to EVs, and not because they are greener, and not because they are cheaper. we are going to switch to EVs because they are better cars. period. the model 3 performance pack is currently a better car than cars cost 2 and 3 times as much. and can do everything than can do with the AC on carrying 3 passengers. end of story. EVs already won. its over. if you cant see that, you are lost.

We will never scale to producing 10 million new EV cars a year. Simply not going to happen.

I am not anti-EV in anyway shape or form. I will be looking at a hybrid small truck once I no longer need a 1/2 ton truck...so spare me the insults.

https://the-pipeline.org/piercing-the-electric-car-fantasy/

Right now, electric vehicles make up about 1 percent of America’s car fleet. If they pose challenges for the electric grid already, what will the challenges look like if the EV fleet reaches 50 percent of the auto fleet as Biden proposes? No wonder Elon Musk says we’ll need to expand electric power generation by 30 percent or more to meet the demand of a larger EV fleet on the road. And yet it is supremely uncouth to point out that electrons for EV batteries are generated mostly from fossil fuels right now, and thus EVs may not deliver a net reduction in greenhouse gas emissions when a proper life-cycle analysis is done.

Economist Mark Perry notes that nearly two-thirds of current U.S. electricity is generated by coal and natural gas, and the figure rises to 86 percent if you include nuclear power, which environmentalists irrationally hate and are trying to eliminate. When you raise this problem, you are met with a hail of green indignation about how we’re starting on an “incredible transition” to a carbon-free energy future (a phrase Biden and energy secretary Jennifer Granholm have both used repeatedly with the unsettling grin of the chiliastic fanatic). “EVs are just an early step toward the carbon-free nirvana, which is just a few hundred thousand more windmills and square miles of solar power away!”

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/uploa...1660222558.jpg

A recent little-noticed report from Volvo punctures this green myth, even though the very green Volvovians try very hard to obscure this conclusion. The report notes what a number of neutral analysts have pointed out for some time now: EVs are more material-intensive than old-fashioned gasoline-powered cars, requiring more steel, aluminum, copper, and other rare earth minerals and specialty products like magnets that must be mined (which environmentalists oppose) and require an energy-intensive process to manufacture into shiny EVs. And that’s before you get to the huge quantity of lithium needed for the batteries.

Thus it is eye-popping when Volvo admits that the carbon footprint for the manufacturing of its C40 Recharge electric car is 70 percent higher than its comparable internal combustion version of the car (the XC40). But not to worry, says Volvo: you’ll make up the higher manufacturing emissions when you drive the emission-free EV far enough.

How far? Kudos to Volvo for calculating that: at the world’s average electricity sourcing today, a C40 driver would need to drive his car 68,000 miles to reach a break-even carbon footprint with a gasoline-powered model. The average American drives about 14,000 miles a year, and thus would need to drive his Volvo EV almost five years before reaching a lower carbon footprint. What if we had a grid that was 100 percent wind- or solar-powered? Volvo calculates that an EV driver would still need to drive 30,000 miles before reaching a carbon-footprint breakeven point with a gasoline car.

Most charging will take place during off peak hours where we have excess capacity.

Today's EV's aren't for everyone. If you commute 50 miles a day they can be a great fit. If you haul a trailer every day, not so much.

I have a neighbor that owns a Mustang Mach E. He says it is the best thing since sliced bread.