The b1tch is back... - Page 4

pwd72s · 03-05-2008, 10:59 AM

Goes to show you. NEVER kick Hillary when she's down. After all, she might get up...

rouxroux · 03-05-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by island911

No, she hinted at a Clinton-Then-Obama ticket.

Imo, there is no way Obama would put Hillary on the His ticket. -Political Suicide.

I think political suicide would then be the least of his worries.

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

I asked my boss, a republican, if he voted yesterday and he said why bother, McCain has already wrapped it up.

Okay, add one vote to McCain's total...still needs a miracle to get close to the Dem loser!

Tim Hancock · 03-05-2008, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WI wide body

Okay, add one vote to McCain's total...still needs a miracle to get close to the Dem loser!

Yeah whatever.... we will see how many republicans turn out for the general election if it is against Hillary. If you think not many....you will be very wrong I assure you

the · 03-05-2008, 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

Yeah whatever.... we will see how many republicans turn out for the general election if it is against Hillary. If you think not many....you will be very wrong I assure you

She would have some challenges in the general election.

I think she would motivate record numbers of Republicans to come out and vote against her.

And she will lose a lot of Democratic voters who will feel disenfranchised if she wins. Because if she wins, it will be at the convention, with plenty of shenanigans. A lot of Obama Democrats are going to just stay home.

lendaddy · 03-05-2008, 12:31 PM

If Hillary wins (I give her 10-20% chance) at convention it will be a huge blow to the Democrats stranglehold on black vote as well. They have taken a ton of **** from the party in regards to broken promises and snubs but this will be the deal breaker. It's a big if though.

Tim Hancock · 03-05-2008, 12:41 PM

[QUOTE=the;3809975]She would have some challenges in the general election.

I think she would motivate record numbers of Republicans to come out and vote against her.

QUOTE]

So true, I guess WI just can't come to grips with how bad republicans hate her.

My dart board out in my shop/hangar

KFC911 · 03-05-2008, 12:46 PM

Tim you should send that in to Hillary's ad folks...they might want to use it.

Tim Hancock · 03-05-2008, 01:00 PM

I just hope I don't have to peel this bumper sticker off my shop stairs to put it back in service!

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:17 PM

[QUOTE=Tobra;

The only way someone could not understand why Hillary Rodham Clinton is viewed with such rancor and distrust is because they have chosen not to.[/QUOTE]

Please list some of the actual things that HRC has done or gotten accomplished that seem to so have your balls tied into a knot:

Not a whole bunch...just her top 7 or 8 sins?

Thx

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:20 PM

Tim,

If the GOP is going to match the Dems in OH voters you and your boss better find about another 475,000 folks to join you.

hytem · 01:26 PM

Well, "*****" isn't as bad as "Hitlery" and "Hildabeast". Do I detect a new-found respect for Hillary? LOL.

If you check out the poll data for Texas on USAToday's website, the Texas results weren't close without the Republican crossover vote--53 to 46 for Obama. The Dem vote was 53-46 Clinton, and the Independents were evenly split. Republicans were clearly trying to beat Clinton by voting for Obama. In Ohio, the crossover vote was pretty much a draw.

Clinton has the momentum now--she will win PA easily. She also has a superdelegate advantage, since a lot of those people are Democratic party officials who tend to favor Clinton over the new guy, Obama.

If the Democrats had the same winner-take-all primary system as the Republicans have had, Clinton would be ahead of Obama in delegates 1226-1036. That's without Texas (not counted yet), Michigan and Florida. She won the latter two primaries, but the delegates were taken away because the states moved their primary dates up. You can bet those states will be contested at the convention.

Right now, it looks good for Clinton. Her strategy of hiding her husband looks like the right one.
I always thought he was a lousy politician. Strictly a policy-wonk.

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by varmint

Off the top of my head.

Running the "Bimbo Eruption Sqaud" back in Arkansas.
Cattle futures.
Selling presidential pardons, from marc rich to puerto rican terrorists.
White water.
Laundering Chinese money to finance her campaigns.
Travelgate, filegate,

She has flat out socialist ambitions for this country. And she thinks she doesn't have to follow the law in pursuit of her noble ideals.

Read Christopher Hitchen's book "No one left to lie to". He dissected the Clintons.

Nearly everything you listed is nonsense, complete bull*****, or irrelevant.

It's a rant rather than anything logical or fact.

hytem · 03-05-2008, 01:24 PM

Moderator-- the title of this thread should be ****** ed, like it just got ******ed in my post. I would agree with that. Just be consistent.

Tim Hancock · 03-05-2008, 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WI wide body

Tim,

If the GOP is going to match the Dems in OH voters you and your boss better find about another 475,000 folks to join you.

Just to get you on record. Are you are saying that republicans will not turn out in droves to defeat Hillary if she gets the nomination? A simple yes they will or no they won't will suffice.

onewhippedpuppy · 03-05-2008, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

Just to get you on record. Are you are saying that republicans will not turn out in droves to defeat Hillary if she gets the nomination? A simple yes they will or no they won't will suffice.

They live in a slightly different reality. I predict record Rep. turnout.

hytem, you fail to mention the effect it will have on the Dem party if Hitlery/Hildabeast/the b!tch

loses the popular vote, but still gets the nomination based on superdelegates. I.e., the party overrules the vote of the people. How well do you see that going over? Me, I'm thinking not so well.

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

Just to get you on record. Are you are saying that republicans will not turn out in droves to defeat Hillary if she gets the nomination? A simple yes they will or no they won't will suffice.

I'm saying that there is so much resentment per the past 7 years fiasco that it will make little difference how many GOP hil-haters there might be.

Read the numbers!!!

Tim Hancock · 03-05-2008, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WI wide body

I'm saying that there is so much resentment per the past 7 years fiasco that it will make little difference how many GOP hil-haters there might be.

Read the numbers!!!

So you won't answer the question. I knew you wouldn't

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:46 PM

[QUOTE=onewhippedpuppy;3810139]They live in a slightly different reality. I predict record Rep. turnout. QUOTE]

Perhaps the "slightly different reality" is the population of most of this board. Reminds me of what Paul O'Neill said about Bush meetings being "like a blind man in a room full of deaf people" becuase of the lemmings all nodding their heads at each other.

Just because there are about 8 or 10 goofy Hil-Haters on this board does not comprise a national landslide. You guys rant like little kids (and often devoid of any facts) while ignoring that she got over 2,300,000 votes....yesterday!

You might need to talk to them instead of each other.

WI wide body · 03-05-2008, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

So you won't answer the question. I knew you wouldn't

Tim, did the answer befuddle you or what?

Yes, they will turn out in droves.

And no it will not mean a damn thing in the overall picture.

Got it?