![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St Louis
Posts: 4,211
|
Quote:
If that is not the case how do you calculate this? With gas I get 25 MPG so 10 gallons of gas I can go 250 miles. With 10% ethanol it takes 11 gallons to go 250 miles (10% more fuel). The 25 mpg is now 22.7 or 10% less.
__________________
Rick 88 Cab |
||
![]() |
|
canna change law physics
|
BTU content of dry ethanol is aproximately 75% of that of Gasoline for the same volume. BUT, alcohol is also hygroscopic. So the BTU content can actually be quite a bit less, by the time it used. Regular Gasoline these days is supposed to be 90% gasoline, 10% Ethanol. It might actually be 85% gasoline, 10% ethanol, 5% water.
E85 can be far far worse. It is supposed to be 85% ethanol, 15% gasoline. It might be 30% water. And the taxes are based on gallons, not BTU content. So, yep, you get double screwed. Welcome to how our government screws things up.
__________________
James The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the engineer adjusts the sails.- William Arthur Ward (1921-1994) Red-beard for President, 2020 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
using a 75% equivalence to gasoline, and assuming that BTU content is directly related to fuel efficiency, a 10% blend would only decrease mileage by 10% x 25% = 2.5%, yielding 24.375 MPG That is alot less than the 10% claim from masrum, hence my confusion...
__________________
Silver '88 RoW Carrera Grey '06 A4 Avant Last edited by TheMentat; 04-16-2008 at 09:53 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Did you get the memo?
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 32,541
|
I knew someone whould chime in with a nice ME thermodynamics answer, thanks Red Beard! Thermodynamics..........*shudder*.
__________________
‘07 Mazda RX8-8 Past: 911T, 911SC, Carrera, 951s, 955, 996s, 987s, 986s, 997s, BMW 5x, C36, C63, XJR, S8, Maserati Coupe, GT500, etc |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|