|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Math question for all you smart guys
This seems like it should be easy to me but I'm not so sure now.
If one cubic yard is 3 ft x 3 ft x 3 ft, what are the dimensions of a cube whose volume is 10 cubic yards. I thought it would be 30 ft x 30 ft x 30 , but that would one 2700 yards. Where am I going wrong. I'm afraid my ignorance is showing, but it wouldn't be the first time...
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
|
|
|
|
D idn't E arn I t
|
27 cubic ft x 10 = 270 cubic ft.
rjp
__________________
AOC/Hogg 2028 |
||
|
|
|
|
Burn the fire.
|
10 cubic yards?
1yd = 3ft so... 10³yd = 30³ft 30³ft = X • X • X Try it that way.
__________________
[x] Working | [_] Broken: 2017 Victory Octane [x] Working | [_] Broken: 2005 Ram 1500 SLT w/5.7L Hemi "Drive it like you stole it." |
||
|
|
|
|
Max Sluiter
|
It is the cube root of 270. Get your calcumalator out.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
|
I'm just doing this in my head while drinking. but wouldn't 9 sq' on the bottom.middle and top equal 27sq'. Not yards.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Lawrenceville GA 30045
Posts: 7,384
|
6.46 ft x 6.46 ft x 6.46 ft = 270 ft^3 = 10 yds ^3
__________________
Mark '83 SC Targa - since 5/5/2001 '06 911 S Aerokit - from 5/2/2016 to 11/14/2018 '11 911 S w/PDK - from 7/2/2021 to ??? |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
|
Oh I got it now. You were right about the 30 by 30 by 30. Except you forgot those were ' and used yards instead.I'm guessing 30 x30 x 30 '.Not yards.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
|
It's 2700 sq' not yards.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 14,292
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
So these are the exterior dimensions? I think you're right but it just seems too small since its 10 times mores than 3 x 3 x 3!
__________________
David 1972 911T/S MFI Survivor |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
|
oops. my mistake. I meant cubic ' not sq'.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Driver
|
It's not 288?
__________________
1987 Venetian Blue (looks like grey) 930 Coupe 1990 Black 964 C2 Targa |
||
|
|
|
|
durn for'ner
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of Sweden
Posts: 17,090
|
This is exactly why the SI-metric system is so much easier.
__________________
Markus Resident Fluffer Carrera '85 |
||
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 31,744
|
1 cubic yard is 27sq'.
Im thirsty. |
||
|
|
|
|
Gon fix it with me hammer
|
not really, this is one example where SI is just about the pretty much the same task.
1 x 1 x 1 = 1 cubic whatever So what sides does a cube with 10 cubic meter volume have? it ain't 10, and it aint 1 either.. 3.16227766 meter EDIT CRAP, and even that is wrong. so much for metric..
__________________
Stijn Vandamme EX911STARGA73EX92477EX94484EX944S8890MPHPINBALLMACHINEAKAEX987C2007 BIMDIESELBMW116D2019 Last edited by svandamme; 11-04-2011 at 02:22 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Dog-faced pony soldier
|
Cube root of 10 = approx. 2.15
Units don't matter. 2.15 yards = +/- 6.XX feet. 2.15^3 = 10
__________________
A car, a 911, a motorbike and a few surfboards Black Cars Matter |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 5,473
|
Thats how I did it.
__________________
Ole Skool - wouldn't have it any other way |
||
|
|
|
|
Dog-faced pony soldier
|
Yep, calculate first then convert the units.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Volume is proportionate to the cube of the linear dimension, so the cube doesn't have to get 10X "bigger" (each side's length) to have 10X the volume. That's why if you took a gazelle and scaled it up to be as big as an elephant, it's legs would break. It's mass is proportional to the volume (cube) but the strength of its leg bone is proportional to the cross sectional area (square). As you scale up the gazelle, mass increases faster than bone strength and the legs break.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Edministrator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF east bay
Posts: 24,850
|
Yes. Surface to weight ratio, a driving force of nature. That's why ants are so strong, proportionally.
__________________
Good post? Leave a tip! O - $1 O - $2 O - $3 |
||
|
|
|