![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2019
Posts: 12
|
CHT Sensor Availability
Hello -
I hope this is not a distasteful question on a part vendor site - But has anyone purchased a CHT sensor lately (84' Carrera)? Pelican is out of stock on the Bosch and Porsche part... I am trying to find a replacement brand - but every site I have checked that carries this part is out of stock (********, Rock, FCP, Advance Auto, Ebay, etc......) Any suggestions or am I in for the $260 Porsche part? Thanks!!! Jim. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,482
|
Read down, there was conversation last week and it crossed BMW part number because Bosch seems not to be available.
Bruce |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,494
|
here's a link to the other thread -- Where to buy cylinder head temp sensors
note that it doesn't look like the CHT addressed in that post was a BMW part after all -- looks like (at least for now), we're stuck with the $260 Porsche part as the only real option, with the Bosch-numbered part generally unavailable |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Or the 993 CHT sensor, which looks remarkably similar, and is available. Or the 914 sensor, which would require converting the spade to a JT plug.
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,494
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Quote:
So all you're left with are wiring/connector issues. A 2-wire sensor is better, as the older 1-wire design sometimes had connectivity/grounding issues via the head. Magneti Marelli, by way of illustration, use a slightly different technology for their sensors. Similar, but different, temperature curve. In practice, I doubt it would cause any issue anyway (because I'm guessing the Motronic just regards <65C as "cold" and > 65C as "hot") - but to give you an idea, the different curve on an MM sensor (if there were one physically suitable for a 3.2) would result in ~10 degrees of error at the very extremes of the scale - like at -40C. The two different curves coincide somewhere around 110C, IIRC. Like, meh, no biggie. I only know about the MM sensor because Italian vehicles tend to use them; the one for my Monster is stupidly, not-even-funny expensive in a Ducati box, as opposed to buying the same sensor for a Fiat Panda or a Land Rover, or whatever the equivalent was... My issue with the Ducati turned out to be something else entirely - but I pretty much concluded that any Bosch sensor that physically fitted would be "close enough" for practical purposes.
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |