![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Assuming you're keeping the 3.2 then think seriously about changing the ring / pinion to 7.31 ratio - instant acceleration improvement for street, track and autox.
__________________
Mike - PBG, FL '14 958 Cayenne GTS '05 997 C2 - SOLD '79 911 SC Widebody PCA, NASA, PBOC - SOLD 2004 NASA-SE GTS4 Champ, 2005 + 2007 NASA-SE GTS3 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,638
|
Jeff:
I have an 87 Carrera. All it took was a handfull of laps around a road course circuit to conclude: (1) My car has more than enough acceleration, (2) My brakes are great, (3) Every $ I spend on performance will go into suspension, seat time, and adding less weight. I do not want a dedicated track car, so a roll cage, harness, and race buckets are a no no for me. If you want a crisper throttle response, a Steve W chip may be worthwhile for you too. I have had one for a year and it is great. Finally, I just got back from a 700 mile trip up Hwy 1 in California. It is a lot of high speed mixed with a gaggle of tight twisties. I was NEVER wanting for more hp. A more balanced and grippy chasis would have been nice though. Good luck. Mike |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Concur with the guys on getting DE time. I've done it in my Carrera and in my 993 and have had my a$s handed to me by older, slower cars with great suspension and more experienced drivers. After my first DE in the 993 I swore I wouldn't spend another dime on HP until I had upgraded suspension and done a few more DE's.
Well, now I'm there. My Bilstein HD's and H&R springs are about as good as it gets, so I'm spending money on another DE and will start planning an engine drop for light-weight flyhweel and RS clutch kit, maybe even a Euro G50/21 gearbox. But this is gratuitous stuff mainly for street driving. A stock Carrera does just fine on the track and you'd be amazed how much you can get out of the car with just more seat time.
__________________
2022 BMW 530i 2021 MB GLA250 2020 BMW R1250GS |
||
![]() |
|
Diss Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: SC - (Aiken in the 'other' SC)
Posts: 5,020
|
To really make it go faster, toss it out of an airplane at about 30,000 feet!
Wayne ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
The usual way is
![]()
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
OK, I'll do some DEs, get the chip, then work over the suspension. Once all that's done I'll drop it out of an airplane at 30,000 feet. Anyone have access to a C-30 that I can borrow?
__________________
86 Carrera Targa - Garnet Red Metallic 88 928 S4 - Gran Prix White |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
86 Carrera Targa - Garnet Red Metallic 88 928 S4 - Gran Prix White |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
First and number 1 upgrade is the nut behind the wheel (you). Do at least one DE - I found I had plenty of power.
from there - Steve Wong chip, Dansk premuffler, Sport muffler. - you won't gain much for the $$ from SSI's. From there do a search on Stage II Turbo from Promotive.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
I suggest that a search is in order. There are a whole bunch of guys that have used different cams w/ good results. The main caveat is that the Motronic metering system limits the lumpiness that can be used.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
"lumpiness'
- a good term -- not just for cams but for many of the answers posted on this and other BBS's BTW, you need to think about what is legal, and what is affordable. It is a lot cheaper to do thought experiments than to rush in with a wallet and a wrench. good luck. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,328
|
I second everyone who said spend some time on DE.
My 84 is plenty fast with just a weight reduction plan and a SteveW chip, but what made it a great car to drive fast was a complete suspension R&R wtih bigger T bars, Elephant Racing bushings, Bilstein Sports, turbo tierods, lowered and corner balanced. For weight reduction, I pulled entire AC Momo Corse's for driver and passenger Minimal interior... no back seats, no carpet, console No spare tire, but a can of fix-a-flat and tire repair kit
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Planet Eugene
Posts: 4,346
|
SUre a DE helps you drive faster on the track. But reread his comments - he is looking for certain things -- and they aren't particularly well correlated with DE experience.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Thanks for understanding Randy. But I did get plenty of help from everyone, and I do understand the importance of DE events.
__________________
86 Carrera Targa - Garnet Red Metallic 88 928 S4 - Gran Prix White |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
|
Do a search for "Juan Ruiz" on this Forum and you'll see how to make a 3.2 FAAAASSSSSSSSSTTTTTTTTTT!!!!
__________________
Merv '89 911 Turbo Cab Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Red: stock chip
Blue: performance chip (that you can purchase everyday at Pelican) ![]() ![]() From Tomturtle's '88 Clubsport. Last edited by Steve W; 08-17-2004 at 06:05 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
When I first got my SC it had ok power. But I am a turbo guy so I put a 930 motor in my car. That was the single best thing that I did to my car. It made my Porsche go like it should.
Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,950
|
Dean, lets keep it real. I would not put a engine transplant in the same catagory as a chip and exhaust modifications. I would hope your car is faster. Not everyone wants to dump the engine they just got with their car and then spend another $10,000 for engine work. I think they would of just bought a turbo instead.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: MA USA
Posts: 2,938
|
Jeeze I was just telling the original poster what I did to my car to make it faster. I don't think I implied that a turbo is in the same catagory as a chip and exhaust.
Dean
__________________
Dean 911 SC turbo, 3.0L 930 motor, G50, 930 brakes, DTA EFI, 352 RWHP DynoDynamic dyno, |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Any particular reason the dyno graph is scored at a 6200rpm instead of a more realistic chip comparison at 6K?
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Basically with the stock chip, peak hp is attained at 5900 rpm, as shown the owner's manual and multiple dyno charts, as can be seen here:
http://www.911chips.com/dyno.html With the performance chip, the hp contines to rise past 5900 and a new peak is reached at around 6200 rpm. As you can see, at 6200 rpm, the engine has gained 22 rear wheel hp, an equivalent of 26 crank hp. That is a 12% gain in power. Past 6000 rpm, the engine power seemingly continues to rise and pull until the rev limiter hits, whereas with the stock chip, the engine seems like it hits a wall after 6200. Last edited by Steve W; 08-17-2004 at 08:09 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|