I bought a roller: Now I need help choosing an engine

in_style · 02-22-2007, 09:20 AM

I bought an 82 SC from a fellow member of this site. Found the ad in the classifieds section.

The car has a fresh 915 trans. I now need to choose an engine.

Do I save money on a 3.0 and mod it up?

Do I choose a 3.2L and mod it?

Do I spend the big money on a 930?

Do I go straight for the 3.6L? I have the 3.6 located with all the parts for the conversion, for about $7000 CDN.

I assume people are going to say: go for the 930, but a 3.6...to me seems more reliable and smoother power band.

Any ideas?

Rich76_911s · Rich76_911s's Garage

$7000 CDN for a complete conversion 3.6L seems like a steal to me.

Get a pre purchase inspection with a leakdown test on an engine out of the car. If it is in it and able to be driven get a compression and leakdown test done.

Rich

Superman · 02-22-2007, 09:38 AM

3.6, definitely. No question.

81 911 SC · 02-22-2007, 09:39 AM

I would not waste your money on a 930 motor unless you like turbo lag and the jolt in the back driving. It depends on what you are going to do with the car.. autotox, DE etc.

I agree the prices on the 3.6 is a good value and I agree a PPI on that or any motor is a must.

Cory M · 02-22-2007, 09:50 AM

3.6

in_style · 02-22-2007, 09:55 AM

Thanks for the help guys, I will look at the 3.6 closer. It comes with a warrantee.

81 911 SC · 02-22-2007, 10:03 AM

If it is a previous Motor Meister rebuild or has had any contact with Motor Meister walk away

jorian · 02-22-2007, 10:05 AM

You have a PM.

Jack Olsen · 02-22-2007, 10:18 AM

If cost is no object, a turbo motor can give you the best of all possible worlds. But the price ceiling in the turbo world is a lot higher (like as much as 8x) than it is for a US$6,000 3.6 with the swap parts included. If what you're describing is legit, you'd be nuts not to jump on it.

in_style · 02-22-2007, 05:03 PM

Are some 3.6's better then others? What is with the vram, is that the one to have? Are there ones to avoid? Is there a good aftermarket for them?

speedracer · 02-22-2007, 05:06 PM

Where in Sask are you?

Zeke · 02-22-2007, 05:14 PM

Can I get a 6K 3.6 with the ancilaries???? Please?

in_style · 02-22-2007, 06:15 PM

I am in Regina. I see you are from saskatoon! There is snow heading your way. It is almost here now.

peritus · peritus's Garage

I was in the same boat as you are - I have an 87 Carrera with a blown 3.2. I was going to go the 3.6 route, but the whole project cost was up around $20k CDN before suspension and brake upgrades.

I decided to just get another car (SC) that's already been converted to a Varioram.

If you're sure about the quality of the 3.6, and you are able to get a warranty, then absolutely go for it.

If you pass it up, let me know. Rebuilding the 3.2 is fun and all, but having a 3.6 in both cars would be overkill, meaning it'd be awesome...

SCHNELE · SCHNELE's Garage

I just love it when guys like 81 SC make choice comments about Turbo engines...lol what lag, just massive torque

81 911 SC · 02-23-2007, 07:00 AM

I just love when people like you make a comment like "lol what lag, just massive torque" I'll take my PMO and the lack of worrying about when the turbo blows up because they always do at some point.

Rich76_911s · Rich76_911s's Garage

Quote:

Originally posted by milt
Can I get a 6K 3.6 with the ancilaries???? Please?

When I saw him post I started think how long of a drive is it to saskatchewan

If all you say is true this is a no-brainer.

speedracer · 02-23-2007, 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by in_style
I am in Regina. I see you are from saskatoon! There is snow heading your way. It is almost here now.

Yup it is here... I am getting really sick of the snow/winter! I am going through major porsche withdrawal. Good thing I have gran turismo and a driving simulator...

Good luck in finding an engine. If you are ever in Saskatoon shoot me a pm.. as you probably know, not alot of porsche guys around here...

Gunter · Gunter's Garage

3.6 sounds good but don't forget...............................a 915 (And half shafts/CV's) from 1982 have been designed to take the torque from a 3.0, not a 3.6.
Porsche realized this issue and increased the CV's/half shafts around 1985 for the 3.2.
Then, in 1987, still with the 3.2, the G50 replaced the 915.
There are quite a few people on this board who tried a 3.6 with a 915 and promptly busted the transmission.
And why not?
Waiting for the 3.6/915-experts to go blah, blah, blah......................but me thinks that common sense dictates:
The 915, even with WEVO re-enforcements, was not designed for a 3.6 .

A nice 3.0 or 3.2 with 964-cams and SSI's is a lot of fun and doesn't end up costing a fortune with big problems down the road.
Think hard! If you use a 3.6, you need to consider the above issues.

RideShoot&Drink · 05:19 PM

That 3.6 sounds like a bargain, especially if it's healthy and comes with all conversion parts. But don't forget about brakes, suspension and cooling upgrades that would be required after you done with your engine conversion. Or even better, sell the engine, sell the chassis, and buy yourself 964. In any scenario, may luck be with you!