Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 460
Garage
Motronic from a 3.2 on a 3.0 SC

Has anyone installed a complete Motronic unit from a 3.2 onto a 3.0 in an SC? Would this not be a good replacement for a failing CIS system?

Thanks

Old 10-15-2007, 10:01 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,650
Good question. I'd like to know the answer to this myself...
Old 10-15-2007, 10:17 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Registered
 
Scott R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aspen CO US
Posts: 16,054
Garage
I looked into this last week, there is a company that makes a kit in fact, Clewett engineering:

http://www.clewett.com/products/engnmgmt/emsys.htm

Biggest issues that steered me away were, having to cut the bellhousing for the reference sensor bracket. Changing the flywheel out again, meant another engine drop me. And dealing with the ignition system, the SC distributor in manual advance, the 3.2l is motronic of course, and controlled by the DME. I couldn't find reference is using a 3.2l dizzy on an SC, I bet you can, but I couldn't find any info on it.

Next and last deal killer was the cylinder head temp sensor, you would have to machine the head to accept it, or find some cleaver workaround.
__________________
2021 Model Y
2005 Cayenne Turbo
2012 Panamera 4S
1980 911 SC
1999 996 Cab
Old 10-15-2007, 10:18 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered
 
Scott R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aspen CO US
Posts: 16,054
Garage
I wanted to mention on other thing as well, you could use the 3.2l intake and get the BITZ fuel rails and Megasquirt setup to drive it. You get the benefit of the 3.2l intake design, and more programmability.
__________________
2021 Model Y
2005 Cayenne Turbo
2012 Panamera 4S
1980 911 SC
1999 996 Cab
Old 10-15-2007, 10:21 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered
 
sjf911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 5,727
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott R View Post
I wanted to mention on other thing as well, you could use the 3.2l intake and get the BITZ fuel rails and Megasquirt setup to drive it. You get the benefit of the 3.2l intake design, and more programmability.
This is what I have except I have the 3.2 fuel rails and FPR. Using the Motronic almost necessitates using a 3.2 engine/tranny combination unless you want to do lots of modifications. The 3.2 intake is great but you need 3.2 heads to optimally mate them to. You can modify 3.0 heads to fit but this is not perfect. Megasquirt or other aftermarket ECU setups offer much more flexibility in designing your EFI system.
__________________
Steve
Sapere aude
1983 3.4L 911SC turbo. Sold
Old 10-15-2007, 12:49 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered
 
Bill Douglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,803
Scott, you car sounds like a nice setup. How does it perform?
Old 10-15-2007, 01:07 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Scott R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aspen CO US
Posts: 16,054
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Douglas View Post
Scott, you car sounds like a nice setup. How does it perform?
Did you mean Steve? He has the 3.2 intake. I had Bitz EFI up until yesterday when I went back to CIS.
__________________
2021 Model Y
2005 Cayenne Turbo
2012 Panamera 4S
1980 911 SC
1999 996 Cab
Old 10-15-2007, 01:31 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Registered
 
Bill Douglas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: bottom left corner of the world
Posts: 22,803
I was looking at your footer "1980 911 SC TBITZ EFI 10:5:1 JE's SSI's 964 CAMS Heater Backdate " and thought it sounds like the sort of setup I'd like to have.
Old 10-15-2007, 03:09 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered
 
Scott R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Aspen CO US
Posts: 16,054
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Douglas View Post
I was looking at your footer "1980 911 SC TBITZ EFI 10:5:1 JE's SSI's 964 CAMS Heater Backdate " and thought it sounds like the sort of setup I'd like to have.
Oh, ok. Well if you read my dyno thread so far it's only made 141 hp, which is why I switched back to CIS. I'm going back on Saturday for another set of pulls. Can't exactly say what was going on with the EFI post rebuild, but so far I have far better response from the CIS system.
__________________
2021 Model Y
2005 Cayenne Turbo
2012 Panamera 4S
1980 911 SC
1999 996 Cab
Old 10-15-2007, 03:33 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roslin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 267
I'm planing to do the same conversion ( Motronic on SC)
- Do i need the 3.2 distributer, as the advance curve is controlled by the DME ?
- SC distributer is so far i know rotating the opposite direction?
- If the 3.2 distributer is used - can it rotate backwards, with the gear mounted from an SC distributer ? .. have hoped not to open the engine to change the distributer drive :-/

Thanks Roslin
__________________
Porsche 911 SC 3.0
Old 09-18-2013, 02:13 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cumming, GA 30041
Posts: 883
Why would want to do this?

Motronic is very complicated, has tons of things that frequently go wrong, is a pain to diagnose and repair (not to mention expensive) and does not give any sort of great power advantage.

Browse threads here on Pelican... I bet 3.2 motronic problems are the single biggest category of problem posted here. Why anyone would volunteer to go down this road when carbs and a re-curved distributor offer so much more power and simplicity is beyond me.
__________________
Terry
Old 09-18-2013, 03:30 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Captain Annoying
 
SteamWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: NSW, Australia
Posts: 557
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tspringer View Post
... when carbs and a re-curved distributor offer so much more power and simplicity is beyond me.
You damn kids. Get off my lawn.
__________________
this time for sure...
Old 09-18-2013, 04:41 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 12,627
Garage
Any subject is complicated if you don't know about them.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tspringer View Post
Why would want to do this?

Motronic is very complicated, has tons of things that frequently go wrong, is a pain to diagnose and repair (not to mention expensive) and does not give any sort of great power advantage.

Browse threads here on Pelican... I bet 3.2 motronic problems are the single biggest category of problem posted here. Why anyone would volunteer to go down this road when carbs and a re-curved distributor offer so much more power and simplicity is beyond me.
Really? You probably have not owned or driven 3.2 Carrera Motronic car for you to come to this conclusion. My two- cents.

Tony
Old 09-18-2013, 04:54 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
ROW '78 911 Targa
 
timmy2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 10,214
Garage
Bitz EFI and my ROW mechanical advance only dizzy on my '78 is working great with proper tuning.

Key words, proper tuning.

Reliability greatly improved with a slight improvement in fuel mileage as well.

I don't understand Scott's issues, maybe he needed to change injectors for the changes in the engine? More flow needed? Completely different AFR map for sure...
Old 09-18-2013, 05:00 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
MBruns for President
 
JeremyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: St. Pete, FL
Posts: 15,066
Garage
I know Nippy had a 3.2 Intake on his SC {and Motronic}

My $6K Porsche 911
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey
Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2
Old 09-18-2013, 06:51 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roslin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tspringer View Post
Why would want to do this?

Motronic is very complicated, has tons of things that frequently go wrong, is a pain to diagnose and repair (not to mention expensive) and does not give any sort of great power advantage.

Browse threads here on Pelican... I bet 3.2 motronic problems are the single biggest category of problem posted here. Why anyone would volunteer to go down this road when carbs and a re-curved distributor offer so much more power and simplicity is beyond me.
I would like to have a full program able system where i'm really able to fine tune things
The engine compartment look's like a mess, with CIS ! don't like that - ok this is only a visual thing, but like 3.2 setup from that point of view.
__________________
Porsche 911 SC 3.0
Old 09-18-2013, 10:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #16 (permalink)
Registered
 
Roslin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 267
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeremyD View Post
I know Nippy had a 3.2 Intake on his SC {and Motronic}

My $6K Porsche 911
Thanks Jeremy - i will contact him, to get some details.

Roslin
__________________
Porsche 911 SC 3.0
Old 09-18-2013, 10:18 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #17 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
Lots of guys, in particular the 930 guys, have gone the route of replacing the CIS with a Carrera intake and megasquirt. You should explore that path too.
Old 09-19-2013, 04:11 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #18 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pocono Mts=Pa
Posts: 74
Garage
Will the injector bushings that come with a Bitz kit work with the 3.2 minifolld? Also do I have to modify my 3.0 sc heads? I already have the crank fire XDi.
Old 09-19-2013, 04:49 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #19 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,587
To fit a Carrera intake to SC heads, you would need to modify the heads. Turbo Kraft sells an adapter kit that makes it a bolt on affair. I can't comment about the Bitz injector bungs, but the Carrera already has proper fuel injectors. I plan to use the factory fuel injectors/rails that came with my Carrera intake when I convert to megasquirt. Having said that, I'd imagine that the fuel injectors the Bitz kit is set up will plug into the Carrera intake.

Old 09-19-2013, 05:16 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #20 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:23 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.