Pelican Parts
Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   Pelican Parts Forums > Porsche Forums > Porsche 911 Technical Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
NOS driver
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 211
finding out CR from compression test?

Hi,
I've got plenty of invoices and papers on my 71 911 T from the 70's all the way to the 90's. The car was sold first time in the US (Oregon) and seriveced and kept there, I believe, until 2006 when it was imported to Europe. However, I have no info about who rebuilt the engine and when. The engine has been rebuilt quite recently anyway, as it looks nice and clean. In a paper from 1984 they claim the engine is a rebuilt 2.4T.
Among all the papers I've got the are 3 different compression tests. One of them is from the 80's. The average was 110. then I've got one from 2003, the average is 140-145. The last one I've got is dated 2006, and the average is 170-175.
The first test looks reasonable for a T engine 110/14=7.8, the second one looks high for a T engine, and I believe the third one is too high for any porsche engine, but I have no experience with compression tests.
Based on Your knowledge, can I estimate which motor I've got from the data I have?
The car is a matching number, so whatever they did they did it on the original engine.
luca

Old 05-15-2011, 10:24 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wilmington, NC USA
Posts: 635
Compression ratio(CR) is defined as the volume of the cylinder at BDC(Bottom Dead center) divided by the volume at TDC(Top Dead Center). It is a characteristic of the cylinder and combustion chamber design. Your pressure readings from a compression test will not indicate the CR of a motor. Too many other variables such as temperature of the motor, intake, leaks from cylinder etc will affect the pressure test. I hope this helps.
__________________
69 911 2.3Ez
85 928S
Old 05-16-2011, 09:46 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
Max Sluiter
 
Flieger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 19,644
Garage
PV=nRT
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened
Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance
Old 05-16-2011, 10:16 AM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
NOS driver
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 211
I understand that there are other variables, but leaks will result into a lower compression, and therefore under estimate the CR.
As for PV=nRT I This you're right Flieger. That's where I got it wrong. The compression test maybe resambles an adiabatic compression (not enough time to exchange heat), so the correct formula should be: PV**gamma = constant.
If that is true, than a compression test giving a reading of 170 PSI should correspond to a volume ratio of about 6 or so. Which makes more sense considering that the engine is having some leaks.
luca
Old 05-16-2011, 01:17 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Detached Member
 
Hugh R's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: southern California
Posts: 26,964
Cold ignoring heat from compression and you could get local air pressure and convert to PSI. Then for example divide 170/14.7 =11.8:1 assuming 14.7 is your ambient air pressure.
__________________
Hugh
Old 05-16-2011, 01:59 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
PRO Motorsports
 
Tyson Schmidt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 4,580
How do you factor in valve timing?

Some cams don't close the intake valve until the piston is nearly half way up on the compression stroke.

I suppose with a compression test you are getting a dynamic compression ratio versus static.
__________________
'69 911E coupe' RSR clone-in-progress (retired 911-Spec racer)
'72 911T Targa MFI 2.4E spec(Formerly "Scruffy")
2004 GT3
Old 05-16-2011, 03:21 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
 
Registered
 
aadrew10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 237
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hugh R View Post
Cold ignoring heat from compression and you could get local air pressure and convert to PSI. Then for example divide 170/14.7 =11.8:1 assuming 14.7 is your ambient air pressure.
You can't ignore the heat generation, it has a significant impact on the pressure reading. If you let the air cool down, you've lost a lot due to leaks anyways. Then add in the above mentioned valve timing issues, and you may as well guess a CR of 10 plus or minus 5.

You could put a tube with the same fitting as the threads of a spark plug. Then, screw the end of the tube into the spark plug hole on a cylinder. Then, as the engine turns over, somehow measure the volume of air that is sucked in and out. You still have the potential valve overlap issues however. If you are careful, you may be able to tell if there are overlap issues by observing when there is suction or positive pressure in relation to crank position. Once all pressure or vacuum disappears, you know a valve has just opened.

As for me, I believe my engine has a compression ratio of SWEET!

__________________
- Andrew
81SC
Old 05-16-2011, 03:49 PM
  Pelican Parts Catalog | Tech Articles | Promos & Specials    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Reply


 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:38 AM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.