![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
installed today new, final rear fuel lines from Pelican BoxsterGT. these are gorgeous custom fuel lines. also got the special high clearance oil lines in, pics to come soon. car now yard drives.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 716
|
I have two questions. When doing the conversion why is it necessary to:
1) move the fuel filter to the front of the car from the rear? I have heard people say that the 3.2 fuel pump prefers to push the fuel instead of pulling it, but does it really make a difference? Does it affect fuel pressure, and if so in which way? 2) replacing the oil tank with a 3.2 tank. Other than the AAV and PCV vacuum circuit which most people cap off, why would this be required?
__________________
1975 Widebody 911 3.2 Euro |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Moving the fuel pump to the front gets it further from the engine heat (for less chance of vapor lock) and also allows for easier reinforcement of the rear anti-sway bar mounts.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
Good questions. Flieger has answered one and my understanding is that the later tank has better baffling inside than a 73 tank.
But my primary reason for duplicating factory conditions for the fuel pump and the oil tank is that they are...factory. 3.2 engine, oil, and fuel are all complex interrelated systems that work together. Makes troubleshooting easy and takes guesswork out of "why is this happening" as you have a factory system, whether it's in an 86 or a 73 body. Also makes for a more professional install, nothing goofy or half-assed like I've seen on way too many cars. Any time I've deviated from factory, I've used professionally developed parts such as the fuel lines and the high clearance oil lines which are functionally indistinguishable from OEM.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design Last edited by Shaun 84 Targa; 07-04-2011 at 03:10 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
Took the car out yesterday for a quick lap, brakes felt terrible and had almost no brakes by the time I got back in. Took the car out of the garage today, big puddle of brake fluid where the center of the car was. the passenger side hard line from the block to the rubber line had rusted through. Naturally, it is one of the easiest lines to replace with the engine out and the hardest to install with the engine in. Had to remove the trans crossmember, lower it, and finally get a replacement line I had sitting on a shelf, installed.
Then I got the Steve Wong chip in. Then I went out again. the car is fast, almost scary fast, and I don't even think I'm getting wide open throttle and know that I must be losing something to the 1 5/8 inch headers stepping down to the 1 1/2 inch 69E muffler. Still, it's fast, and fun. Big smile day. Now I've got about 10 hours of detail clean-up to do as well as lower the front end and get it aligned. Has been a great project, certainly worth all the time, effort and money. Still have to post the custom high clearance oil lines too once the special S tube from the tank has gone through 1 or 2 more revisions.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Hi Shaun,
There's a fair chance you already have checked this but how does your air filter housing look on the intake side, there is a hose bracket that mounts off the back of it and over time cracks your housing,as l'm new to 911's just luckly found mine with 6k on a fresh engine.And lucky for me it had just started to crack.Good luck sounds like you got it sorted.Cheers Gerry |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
hi Gerry,
Good advice for all to check this out. My housing is OK, it's all the hoses that will get replaced this winter. I don't have any leaks, but virtually every single rubber hose on the motor is on borrowed time.
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|
Home of the Whopper
|
Quote:
Let this be a lesson to all the kiddies out there. The STOP pedal is more important than the GO pedal. Glad all is well.
__________________
1968 912 coupe 1971 911E Targa rustbucket 1972 914 1.7 1987 924S |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Mallorca 9treffen
Posts: 318
|
I search and I would make !!!!
|
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
Quote:
I'm looking to do the same in my car - Sizes of lines? Did you flare them and with what? Thanks in advance - love the progress.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
Quote:
Hi Jeremy, Sure. My car is a 73T that once had CIS with the metal fuel lines through the center tunnel. Some time in it's life, a mighty 69 2.0T motor was installed. Whoever did the job simply cut off the fittings and flares on the tunnel fuel lines and added rubber fuel line and standard clamps, which was fine for the 3 psi. Working with member BoxsterGT, I used a standard metric flaring tool like the one below, simply clamping each line in the block and then flaring it with the tool and pointy tap head. I guessed on the depth of tube needed to give a nice flare and got lucky. Important to slide the new fitting over the tube before flaring. Note that I made just a single flare, not a double as the tool allows with the adapters. Len supplied the correct fittings to match to his custom made lines. the black ones are just for testing, he made beautiful braided ones for final. My car came with 10mm feed and 8mm return lines as stock. For your 3.6, I'm guessing you may want to go this route creating your own center tunnel lines out of a stainless tubing from McMaster Carr, just in 11mm or whatever diameter is appropriate for a thirsty 3.6, installing and flaring. I'd flare the front end by the way, then install, then flare the rear. it's tight back there so leave enough space for the fitting, the tool, and working space. if you have just a bare tub, you could install and flare both ends in the car I think. I'd put some rubber fuel line over the stainless here and there just so it doesn't clang around too much. Then you could just zip tie it to other stuff in the tunnel and not worry about sharp, factory tabs. Give BoxsterGT a PM if you have any questions on fittings and custom fuel line, he can make some beautiful stuff for you, oil as well. hope this helps. S ![]()
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design Last edited by Shaun 84 Targa; 07-05-2011 at 08:46 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
Thank you - appreciate it - and know Len -as I sold him the 2.7 to make room for the 3.6...
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 44,324
|
Good deal!
__________________
Tru6 Restoration & Design |
||
![]() |
|