![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
![]()
please ignore
[This message has been edited by pbanders (edited 04-19-2001).] |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 1,207
|
![]()
I have complied various data from various sources, which you may already have.
TS1 @14F 860-1200 ohms @68F 260-340 ohms @122F 90-130 ohms TS2 @14F 7000-12000 ohms @68F 2000-3000 ohms @122F 680-1000 ohms A plot curve showing temp/resistance relationship would be helpful for those times when you are not at exactly the ambient temp shown so interpolation wouldn't be necessary. |
||
![]() |
|
Administrator
|
![]()
Hey, Jeff--any part numbers, or specific model-year listing, for the two sensors you cite above?
--DD |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: San Ramon, CA
Posts: 1,207
|
![]()
Nope.
These values came from Kjell Nelins article, and other 914-related publications. I have confirmed my working FI system to be within these tolerances on my 74 2.0...so part numbers could be obtained. I have assumed that they are applicable to all years 914 Djet systems. I would expect that if several sensors are tested, that a range of values would be discovered, all within factory tolerance, which has concerned me some. I would think the ECU would be fairly sensitive to minor sensor value changes. Especially the injectors themselves, with only 2.4 ohms value. The FI harnesses can vary by a few ohms just in their inherent wiring, espoecially on old harnesses with corroded connections. I think it would be interesting to dyno a car or scope an engine with both an old and new harness to see if there is any marked difference in updating the wiring. |
||
![]() |
|