Forum biased - Page 12

cool_chick · 11-02-2006, 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rodeo
I'm reserving judgment until snowman weighs in ... that man knows a hot male ass when he sees one!

Good point. But I think he'll pick McQueen.....I think Snowman likes them tough...

notfarnow · 11-02-2006, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cool_chick
Good point. But I think he'll pick McQueen.....I think Snowman likes them tough...

Yeah!

Moneyguy1 · 11-02-2006, 06:01 PM

Speaking of the snowster........

Uncommonly quiet....

"Be vewwy qwiet...he's hunting (fill in the blank with minority name)".

Rodeo · 11-02-2006, 06:03 PM

Whatever he's doing, I'm sure it's not for public consumption ... maybe giving a judo lesson to Tom Cruise?

cool_chick · 11-02-2006, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rodeo
Whatever he's doing, I'm sure it's not for public consumption ... maybe giving a judo lesson to Tom Cruise?

More likely getting one....

bwwwaaaaaaa

cool_chick · 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by svandamme
[B]see , that's where you are completely wrong, like a stuck record

i've requoted yourself like 10 times by now
and each time you come back with

"i stated religions that i know of"

no you didn't
you stated "religion" full stop

.....

you are getting flack because you make a generlized statement
and you haven't been willing to admit that that statement was wrong
instead you keep repeating that you stated something else,, namely " i said it was relgions that i know off" balls! that's not what you said

You know sven...I clearly elaborated the point I was making in the second post. I even said "I hope that answers your question, Sven." That's a MISUNDERSTANDING ON YOUR PART. Maybe understandable as my first post wasn't phrased to fully convey my point, but was most indeed CLARIFIED in my second through 1,000,000,000 post. I NEVER MEANT ANYTHING ELSE OTHER THAN MY EXPLANATION. This is how I felt with the first post, the 10th post, the 1,000,000 post, and how I FEEL RIGHT NOW AND WILL FEEL TOMORROW about the religions I know of (that was elaborated in the second post).

If you can't f#cking deal with that, that's YOUR PROBLEM. But I'll be damned if I'll "admit" something that YOU MADE UP (understandably the first post but rediculous after you reading my second through 1,000,000 post) THAT I WASN'T THINKING, WAS NEVER THINKING, AND NEVER WILL THINK!!!!!!

I"m sure anyone with half a brain understands what I'm saying and got it full well after the second post. Why you don't get it is beyond me....unless you just want to piss with me or something...

I'm sorry, I can't "admit" something that I wasn't saying. If you want to believe I was saying something that I wasn't, that's your problem, not mine, but it still does not alter nor ever will alter nor will ever alter the intent of even my first admittedly unclear post.

Rodeo · 11-02-2006, 06:53 PM

That Jayne Mansfield had some big breasts, huh?

cool_chick · 11-02-2006, 06:54 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Rodeo
That Jayne Mansfield had some big breasts, huh?

It's so f#cking retarded, man......

What's his point? What game is he playing here? Why is he game playing?

fastpat · 11-02-2006, 07:11 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by snowman
This forum is biased. Biased in favor of gays, Christian bashers and real Americans. Why is that? Is Wayne a commie in disguise? I doubt it, but some of his forums are run like there are commies, and gays, and Christian haters, and anti Americans in charge of them.
christians. THats not an open forum its a propaganda forum.

Condensing your position:

Demanding that gays have the same access to their rights as everyone else = pro homosexuality.

Opposing the US and some state government activities = anti-Americanism.

Stating that the US government's military is horrendously wasteful and being misused to defend other countries = anti-military.

Being pro-market, anti-government program = communist.

The above, being your positions, are right out to lunch; and get exactly the respect they deserve.

ZERO.

cool_chick · 11-02-2006, 07:30 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notfarnow
He's creepy, and I bet he shaves his junk

Or the 911 tech forum man-god:

Who is this guy?

And what's wrong with shaving one's junk?

notfarnow · 11-02-2006, 07:52 PM

To clarify, in that original post I said that David Hasselhoff probably shaves his junk (which is ghey).When I was quoted the reference to Hoff got snipped out.

In the picture is Jack Olson, not creepy at all. He is the 911 tech forum man-god.

Wouldn't want anyone to think I was dissing Jack

Rodeo · 11-02-2006, 07:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notfarnow
To clarify, in that original post I said that David Hasselhoff probably shaves his junk (which is ghey)

Not only ghey, it's dangerous.

Come to think of it, maybe that's why we haven't heard from the cutie that started this thread.

"WE'VE GOT A BLEEDER!!!"

cool_chick · 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by notfarnow
To clarify, in that original post I said that David Hasselhoff probably shaves his junk (which is ghey).When I was quoted the reference to Hoff got snipped out.

In the picture is Jack Olson, not creepy at all. He is the 911 tech forum man-god.

Wouldn't want anyone to think I was dissing Jack

Sorry...didn't mean to do that. I just wanted to ask both questions.....

It is soooo not ghey. It's supposed to be quite...um...stimulating...... you should give it a try sometime....