Boycott Starbucks!

[RANDY P]

Remember those dumb "Conversations about Race" a few years back?

Imagine working for a company that makes decisions solely on current SJW fashion and listening to whomever howls the loudest on Social Media. This is no way to run a business.

Chicken with it's head cut off, I hope this costs Starbucks, BIG. This is what you get for acting out, taking sides on Social trends.

Dumb asses.

rjp

[RSBob]

Originally Posted by island911

See, this is why I have a problem with this boycott push. I'm sick of the battle-cry That's Racist used at every turn.

Couldn’t agree more. If those were two white women dressed in business attire they certainly would have been arrested too.

[island911]

Originally Posted by RSBob

Couldn’t agree more. If those were two white women dressed in business attire they certainly would have been arrested too.

If they were asked to leave and didn't, of course they would be.

See, attitudes like yours are part of the problem.
You pretend that others just aren't as tolerant as you are.

News flash, Blacks can be a-holes. Pretending that it's always racism is just ignorance. --virtue-signaling ignorance.

[island911]

Hey Rick What do you think of Diamond and Silk being kicked off Facebook?

I don't remember your snark about that.

[island911]

Let me help you out ...

[tabs]

Originally Posted by RSBob

Couldn’t agree more. If those were two white women dressed in business attire they certainly would have been arrested too.

You are a RACIST!!!!

[Holger]

Did I read correctly that Starbucks is closing 8,000 places?

[KFC911]

Originally Posted by Holger

Did I read correctly that Starbucks is closing 8,000 places?

Yep....boycotts work!

.....they've gotta work on their diversity training and new marketing campaign:

Cheap BLACK Coffee and honky flavored $chit....

Opens up a whole new demographic

[DanielDudley]

Originally Posted by Gretch

boycott it because the coffee sucks and is overpriced..........

Really all I need to know.

[T77911S]

I have been since they opened but nobody has noticed.

im not old enough to drink coffee

[red-beard]

What Starbucks really needs: MORE THAN ONE BATHROOM. Most that I've been in, have only 1 bathroom. Who makes a COFFEE joint with only one unisex bathroom? These days they need a minimum of three: male, female, other.

[Por_sha911]

Originally Posted by varmint

The lesson here...
Affluent older guys who can afford Porsche’s consider Starbucks too expensive.
Hipster millennials with unpaid internships and five room mates think nothing of dropping five bucks a day on coffee.

Apparently, the older Porsche owners figured out that if they didn't pay $5-9 per day for coffee and a treat they would be able to pay for a Porsche.

Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins

As far as I know, they never did this. They came under a great deal of pressure to ban guns on their premises, but to their credit, they refused to do so. Their official position was that they would simply honor whatever local laws were in place at the location in question. They refused to enter the political fray on this one. Or on any other issue, for that matter. I can respect that.

Not true! They heavily in a political agenda
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/18/starbucks-coffee-guns-ceo-schultz/2829937/

Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz on Wednesday announced that guns are no longer permitted in Starbucks stores — or in Starbucks outdoor seating areas.
Schultz made the comments in an open letter to his "Fellow Ame

Although they didn't ban guns, they made it clear that people who carry are not welcome. They have hitched their wagon to those who want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

Yet another reason to not give them money to put political pressure to destroy America:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-immigration-starbucks/starbucks-ceo-schultz-plans-to-hire-10000-refugees-after-trump-ban-idUSKBN15E05X

Starbucks Corp Chief Executive Officer Howard Schultz said on Sunday that the company planned to hire 10,000 refugees over five years in 75 countries, two days after U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order banning refugees from certain countries.

Trump on Friday put a four-month hold on allowing refugees into the United States and temporarily barred travelers from Syria and six other Muslim-majority countries, saying the moves would help protect Americans from terrorist attacks.

Apparently, the safety of our nation is not very important to Starbucks.

Bottom line: Tell me why I should buy their products so that they can use the profits to destroy my country? Do they have the right to do these things? Yes. I would defend to the death their rights to their opinions but I will not help them.

[Rickysa]

https://www.pscp.tv/w/1gqGvpYQodgxB

[scottmandue]

Originally Posted by sammyg2

I've never tasted starbux so don't really know if it's good or bad. The wife likes it.


I drink this every morning, 39 cents per cup: Did I mention I'm a cheap bastage?

French roast!?!?

So, let me get this straight... there is so little crime in Philadelphia the police have time to play bouncer at starbucks?

[Jeff Higgins]

Originally Posted by Por_sha911

Not true! They heavily in a political agenda
https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/2013/09/18/starbucks-coffee-guns-ceo-schultz/2829937/

Although they didn't ban guns, they made it clear that people who carry are not welcome. They have hitched their wagon to those who want to repeal the 2nd amendment.

From your article:

"At this point we'll sit and monitor the situation," says Schultz. "We're hoping that most people will honor the request." But even if gun-carrying customers don't honor the request, says Schultz, "We'll serve them with a smile and not confront them."

[JJ 911SC]

Originally Posted by Holger

Did I read correctly that Starbucks is closing 8,000 places?

For 1 day of "racial bias" training...

[Tobra]

Originally Posted by Jeff Higgins

As far as I know, they never did this. They came under a great deal of pressure to ban guns on their premises, but to their credit, they refused to do so. Their official position was that they would simply honor whatever local laws were in place at the location in question. They refused to enter the political fray on this one. Or on any other issue, for that matter. I can respect that.

They asked people to leave their guns home, whether it was legal for them to carry or not. Their position was made quite clear, and was the subject of some discussion when this happened a few years ago

[Pazuzu]

At least the fun little thread made it 4 full pages before it became a freaking political event.

[island911]

yeah, nothing political about an OP promulgating for a boycott that recently stared up over trumped up racism charges

[Holger]

What a mess ...
All this over not allowing non-customers to use the bathroom?
Here it is perfectly normal NOT to (be allowed to) use the bathroom if you are NOT a customer. Nobody making a fuss over that. Everyone understands that and does not bother anyone.