![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
10k to spend on a 3.2 - What to do?
Suggestions...? Looking for 300 hp NA.
-Jeff
__________________
Jeff |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
3.6? Then sell the 3.2. As they say, there is no substitute for .....
Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Yeah I hear ya. My 3.2 as 33k on it. So it needs nothing.
I am in the process of putting the car (84 Carrera on a diet) but 300 hp would be nice. Car is street/track. I was trying to stay around 10k and the 3.6 swap would go a long way even if I wanted to hot it up a bit before it went in the car. No turbo or SC must be N/A with loads of torque. 915 will remain as is or maybe add LSD. 6k for a pristine 3.2 motor with 33k on it? -Jeff
__________________
Jeff |
||
![]() |
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
Quote:
-Chris
__________________
'80 911 Nogaro blue Phoenix! '07 BMW 328i 245K miles! http://members.rennlist.org/messinwith911s/ |
||
![]() |
|
Doesn't want/need a 3.6L
|
I got close to 300 going from 3.2L to 3.5L but if 300 is your absolute goal then the others are right, do a 3.6L transplant. Your 3.2L at 33K miles would sell in the $6K range I suppose.
80 hp/litre is possible for the 3.2L to 3.4L (3367cc) & 3.5L (3506cc) upgrades using the original Motronic and pump gas. The 993 3.6L motors are a bit better yet and should get you to 300 rather easily with some TLC. 3.4L conversions (assuming Motronic) are in the 225-235 whp range, my 3.5L conversion made 239 whp out of the box and 246 whp with some custom chip tuning on the dyno. Many of the 993 3.6L's motors are in the 260 whp range on Dynojets so that is a good indication where you would be at. Pricing is all over the place, some guys say they spend $8K on a 3.6L transplant and others pay over $20K, dependant on a variety of factors such as motor purchase, sale of old motor, DIY labor or mechanic, etc. I did my 3.5L conversion easily under $10K but I had some special circumstances that others probably would not be able to replicate. Whatever you decide to do, it really wakes these cars up. They are still heavy, but I am really happy with the power the car has now. Good luck with your decision! ![]() Ralph |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
DIS PLACE MENT NA Torque is related very closely to displacement. I think you'll find a 3.4 or 3.5 rebuild on your 3.2 ain't that cheap compared to a 3.6.
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
drag racing the short bus
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Location, Location...
Posts: 21,983
|
Size matters.
![]() Plus you have a 915 box that can handle the torque. I vote 3.6.
__________________
The Terror of Tiny Town |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
You'll never see 300hp out of a normally aspirated DME 3.2....
never. The most you could hope for is about 250...maybe 260 if you throw enough money at it. .....just .02 from someone who's just gone thru all that. But.....If you are just set that -nothing less will do- save yourself alot of engine flogging and buy a '96 or later varioram 993 motor, put super cup cams in it and your done....tons of power with a big cushion of reliability to boot. Have fun !!!
__________________
Johnny Riz 1973 911 Custom Euro 3.2L "Sports Purpose" '10 Subaru WRX-STi Hatch - modded. RGruppe#152 Early 911S Reg.#335 |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
agreed and a big AMEN ![]()
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Sounds like you guys are all on the fence about what to do...
![]() Pretty definitive vote for the 3.6 it seems. My only concern is giving up a bullet proof 3.2 with low miles and lots of life and pick up a 3.6 with unknown history and many more miles... I guess a 3.5 built on the bleeding edge of perfomance to get near 300hp would in theory be less reliable than a 3.6 not fully maxed. I would get the 3.6 and do the work myself. The cup cams for sure. What else for more horsepower while I have it out and not spend silly money on it? -Jeff
__________________
Jeff |
||
![]() |
|
Doesn't want/need a 3.6L
|
Quote:
Sounds like you have a good plan to me, especially if you go through the 3.6L and do some reliability upgrades before installing. You should be able to get top dollar for your low mileage 3.2L, so that significantly helps defray the cost. Bear in mind that while a larger displacement version of your 3.2L is a direct swap (actually your 3.2L rebuilt), a 3.6L is not. You will have to consider exhaust, software and more oil cooling in addition to the motor itself. This has been done countless times now, so there is plenty of advice and info out there for you to do the swap right. Do your research and set up a ballpark of ALL costs associated so you know exactly where you are going in. It can become a slippery slope and many people (myself included) fall into the "for $100 more" syndrome. Ralph |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks Ralph -
As someone who has BTDT I value your opinion. If you had to do it all over again same route? -Jeff
__________________
Jeff |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Keep in mind Ralph has some connections that helped him defray costs in several areas, if I understand correctly.
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Doesn't want/need a 3.6L
|
Quote:
A good 3.4L or 3.5L is still going to cost most people in the $8K-$12K range if you are doing it yourself and using premium parts. It is not cheap and you are limited to about 240 whp on Motronic, mild cams and pump gas. A DIY 3.6L transplant with selling your core motor should be in the same area and will make more power and theoretically be more reliable to boot. If I was in your shoes, I would look at the 3.6L as the serious option first and figure out what your total cost would be installed and running. ![]() Ralph |
||
![]() |
|
fancytown
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: DEE-troit
Posts: 1,726
|
Talk to Souk at motomotions.com
He's working on alot of this kind of stuff. I think he's working on a turbo kit.
__________________
all cars sold. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: So. Calif.
Posts: 19,910
|
Turbocharging a naturally-aspirated engine will be an adventure (not for the faint of heart) unless you're into that sort of thing. However, 300 HP min. would be no problem on a pressurized 3.2, even with mild boost. It all depends on you.
Yes, talk to Souk. Sherwood |
||
![]() |
|
Somewhere in the Midwest
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: In the barn!
Posts: 12,499
|
Hi Gang,
First why is boosting not an option? Is emissions a concern? I am building a 3.4 with mild boost that will see 300HP. That's the goal, and I don't think it's out of reach. I'll be building a similar engine at the same time for a client that will be even more hot rodded than my own. The P&C's seem to be the biggest cost in the project, so I will be boring and replating cylinders to cut the cost a bit. JE pistons instead of Mahle, but lets not start the JE-vs-Mahle debate again. nolift's low mileage 3.2 would just need the topend done. No need to crack the case unless you plan to crank up the boost and increase the max. RPM. That will keep cost down. With a properly sized turbo, the power will start to build at 2500-2800 RPM and nicely span the gap between the RPMs we cruise at and that 4200-4500 spot where a stock 3.2 starts to come alive. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 12,003
|
Send it to me and I will fix you up!!!!!!!!! Just kidding, I am intersted in what 10k turns into. I will be doing a similair job for a client and we are not sure excactly how it is going to be spent. Keep us posted, I would like to know what you decide.
Thanks, Jeff
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep www.turn3autosport.com 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Cayenne Turbo, Macan Turbo, 69 911, Mini R53 JCW , RADICAL SR3 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Jeff, fwiw, we've gotten about 238 rwhp on a Motronic n/a 3.2 but this was a race motor, and not something you'd really want to street around in. We probably left at least another 10 hp on the table if we could have ExtrudeHoned the manifolds, did a little port work, and used a MAF sensor instead of the stock air flow meter.
|
||
![]() |
|
Doesn't want/need a 3.6L
|
Quote:
![]() Ralph |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|