|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
Engine Cases
I have been looking at different engine cases. I have noticed that there is not a great difference in price between the 3.2 and the 3.3 engine cases. Is there a benefit to using a 3.3 engine case to build a normally aspirated engine?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Forced Induction Junkie
|
Quote:
![]() Trying to remember if the 3.2 case had the oil squirters like the 3.3l does for piston cooling.
__________________
Dave '85 930 Factory Special Wishes Flachbau Werk I Zuffenhausen 3.3l/330BHP Engine with Sonderwunsch Cams, FabSpeed Headers, Kokeln IC, Twin Plugged Electromotive Crankfire, Tial Wastegate(0.8 Bar), K27 Hybrid Turbo, Ruf Twin-tip Muffler, Fikse FM-5's 8&10x17, 8:41 R&P |
||
|
|
|
|
up-fixing der car(ma)
|
The case for 3.2 and 3.3 is the same.
The 3.0 case is really similar, but has the sump plate on the bottom rather than just a drain plug.
__________________
Scott Kinder kindersport @ gmail.com |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,567
|
As Scott points out, the 3.2 and 3.3 cases are the same and differ from the SC case only in the replacement of the sump plate with with a drain plug. Both have piston squirters
The attached pics show the difference: SC case ![]() ![]() 3.2/3.3 case ![]()
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
That is amazing. Thanks for the information. Sounds like value would depend on whether or not the case came with a turbo pump?
Are they better than the 3.6 case, or are they basically the same? |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 1,864
|
3.2 case
The other plus of a 3.2 or the late 3.3 is if you plan to run EFI or management, those cases have the mounting points for the crank reference sensors. The squirters can be changed to the larger ones if you need them. The 3.6 case is a completely different animal.
Mike Bruns JBRacing.com
__________________
The two most useless things to a driver are the braking distance behind you and nine-tenths of a second ago. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
I found 79 turbo case. Which I believe would be a 3.3. I assume this is not the same case as the late 3.3 cases. Do the later 3.3's have the larger squirters?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Nash County, NC.
Posts: 8,524
|
The 79 3.3 case will be the same as the SC. Generally the oil pump is priced separately.
Bruce |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
OK, I see. There would be no advantage unless it had the turbo oil pump. Sounds like I will need to get a 3.2, or wait to see if a 3.3 with turbo oil pump comes up.
Unless the turbo oil pump bolts onto the 3.2? This is such a good site! |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 11,567
|
You can use the turbo pump with the SC case. You'll need to use a "dished" sump plate to clear the screen on the turbo pump suction inlet.
__________________
Tom Butler 1973 RSR Clone 1970 911E 914-6 GT Recreation in Process |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 1,794
|
Just a small tidbit to add: Beginning around mid-1983 model year production, SCs have the later Carrera engine case with the drain plug instead of the sump plate.
Brian
__________________
'82 SC Targa '83 SC Cabriolet |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
Which cases has the large spiston squirters?
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 1,864
|
case
I just checked a 930/04 case 78/79 3.0 SC its squirter is .039 in, I have an 89 3.6 and it pins out at .084 in, I will look to see if I have a 3.2 case
Mike Bruns
__________________
The two most useless things to a driver are the braking distance behind you and nine-tenths of a second ago. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 124
|
I am wondering which case is stronger with regard to high-rpm 3,2SS build - should I base it on an a 3.0 SC or a 3,2L case?
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Central Fla
Posts: 1,864
|
cases
I have used both styles over the years on some very powerful 3.0 and larger race setups and have had good results, If I had a choice I would use the later style but that does not mean I would avoid the earlier, I like the way the scavenge pickup looks in the later case and it has to be stronger by design with full perimeter contact.
Mike Bruns JBRacing.com
__________________
The two most useless things to a driver are the braking distance behind you and nine-tenths of a second ago. |
||
|
|
|
|
up-fixing der car(ma)
|
3.0 1978-1983
No crank reference sensor mounts Accepts Turbo oil pump Standard piston squirters Sump plate like early cars 3.0 1983.5 No crank reference sensor mounts Accepts Turbo oil pump Standard piston squirters No sump plate, looks like later cars (1984-1998) 3.2 1984-1989 Crank reference sensor mounts Accepts Turbo oil pump Standard piston squirters No sump plate, looks like later cars (1984-1998) 3.3 early No crank reference sensor mounts Accepts Turbo oil pump Turbo (large) piston squirters Sump plate like early cars 3.3 late Crank reference sensor mounts Accepts Turbo oil pump Turbo piston squirters No sump plate, looks like later cars (1984-1998) Does this help you? They are all basically the same. You can weld on the mounts for reference sensors, the sump plate is not that big of a deal, you can retrofit larger squirters in a standard case. BTW, I have a 3.2 case, PM for details.
__________________
Scott Kinder kindersport @ gmail.com |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
That is excellent help. On a side note, I have been shopping around for cases. I have found that there are large variances in pricing. There are deals out there, I even found a reputable dealer who said that he has a GT3 case for $1500. He does not have any Turbo or 3.2's, but I am hoping to go see what he has. He gave me an interesting run-down on pricing. It seams like the key is to be patient.
Thanks everyone. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burford, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,322
|
Scott, that is a very good reference. Could you put case casting numbers to those versions? I'm guessing 930.101.103.4R & 930.101.104.4R for the first version.
__________________
Keeper of 356, 911, 912 & 914 databases; source for Kardex and CoA-type reports; email for info Researching 356, 911, 912 & 914 Paint codes, Engine #'s and Transmission #'s Addicted since 1975 |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Brink
Posts: 2,838
|
The information must be in a chart ....somewhere on-line.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Burford, ON, Canada
Posts: 2,322
|
This is my own chart, started just recently because I could not find such info anywhere else:
911 engine case Revisions
__________________
Keeper of 356, 911, 912 & 914 databases; source for Kardex and CoA-type reports; email for info Researching 356, 911, 912 & 914 Paint codes, Engine #'s and Transmission #'s Addicted since 1975 |
||
|
|
|