![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
I haven't tried extending the 622 yet, but luckily my intakes are very good so I will only lap them
![]() I had no idea this engine would take this many hours to complete... I'm used to working on 4-5cyl vw/audi engines, so when I started this I was planning to have the engine back in the car in a couple of weeks, yeah right ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
While I'm waiting for my new valve guides I drew a cylinder holder tool you can make if you have a 3D printer
![]() Porsche 911 cylinder holder tool by neffets - Thingiverse ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
|
Awesome project, any updates?
I'm looking into doing a similar ITB setup. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
just a quick update, cylinders have been nikasil plated and bored/honed to my dimmensions by US chrome, cost $189 per cyl, and are on their way back to me
![]() I will post pictures and do a dimmension check and RA measurement when I get them ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
1984 Porsche Carrera
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Posts: 321
|
Wow thats cheap what were they bored to we pay over 400 bucks here per cylinder there is only one place in the country that nikasils so we are stuffed.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 567
|
Flat 6's make great tables. Keep up the good work.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
Can I stack the cylinder to case gaskets?
My stock was 0.25mm, I see from my notes I had to remove 0.4mm from the heads, so I should have a 0.65mm gasket. Or can I use the 0.5mm gasket? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
4 bearing cams in a 2.7?
__________________
'73 2.0 914 (2.8 /6 conversion in progress) '64 356SC '65 Ducati Falcon 80 ‘19 Audi SQ5 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
Last edited by Neffets; 10-26-2014 at 02:20 PM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 148
|
Then I looked into the camshaft housing, and dooh there is a much smaller hole than the stock 6mm, I'll measure it tomorrow, but anything bigger than that up to stock hole is meaningless then...
I drilled mine 3.5mm, but if that is bigger than what's in the camshaft housing than it's the same if it's 3.5 or 6mm... ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: northeast
Posts: 4,527
|
u r correct on all that u say here...but... keep in mind the entire oil circuit when using the later "restricted/smaller hole" fitting has increased overall system oil pressure which is another gain from using the smaller hole fitting...the other gain - debated by many - when using the restricted/smaller hole fitting, less oil is on top of the motor = better oil scavenging by the oil pump as there is more oil down in the sump that can be scavenged & a bit less fluctuation in the qty of oil in the oil tank...
__________________
I live for 911 tweaks... |
||
![]() |
|