Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Off Topic Discussions (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/)
-   -   So where are all the Patriots haters today? (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/off-topic-discussions/367528-so-where-all-patriots-haters-today.html)

onewhippedpuppy 09-18-2007 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 3485731)
LOL reminds me of the rams when they were in anaheim.
The joke goes that the scoreboard flashed:
Will the woman with the 11 kids please come pick them up, they are beating the rams 24-0.

Jaworski's opinion doesn't carry much weight with me. I've heard him say things many times that I thought were complete BS.

Joe Montana is my all time favorite QB and IMO the best that ever played the game.
I also think Brady is in the top 10, maybe even the top 5 of all time but that might be a stretch.
I have no doubt that he is either the best or second best QB that is currently playing the game.
Sometimes I think he's better than Manning, sometimes not.
maybe it's because Brady makes it look so darn easy that is seems like it's no big deal.

The reason I like the pats is because they are one of the ONLY teams in the league with class.
No showboaters, no mouths who can't shut up, no whiners or attention-whores (not to mention any names, but his initials are Terrell Owens). No stupid 'look at me" antics or rehearsed childish games in the end zone. No athlete arrests of the day.

Bellichick won't stand for that kind of low-life ghetto attitude. Heck even Randy Moss is behaving himself this year.
The pats represent what used to make football great. That team first, me second attitude is what makes them winners.
In comparison the raiders and bengals represent what is killing the sport.

Agreed. If there were more teams that conducted themselves like the Pats, I would be a much bigger NFL fan. No BS, just football.

Feel free to label them as cheaters, but this kind of thing has gone on for years. Why do you think most teams have two (or more) players/coaches on the sideline signaling plays?

sammyg2 09-18-2007 02:53 PM

I always thought Bradshaw could have been a linebacker. That guy was tough. Kinda like Bret Favre. They both can get in the face of the defensive linemen without getting intimidated.

What's your opinion of Steve Young?
Granted he had great recievers and a pretty good line, but really didn't have a spectacular running back to support him and he was still sucessfull.
For some reason he doesn't get quite as much press as his stats should get him. Lots of other quarterbacks had a better rep with worse stats. Maybe it's because he was a running QB instead of a pure pocket passer?
I don't think he was as good of a field general as Montana but being able to take off and run got him out of alot of trouble.
I know when he first came back to the NFL after that other football league folded (world?) some folks resented him becausse of the huge salary he got over there. He didn't have the personality of some of the others, maybe that hurt him.

JCF 09-18-2007 02:57 PM

It was magic with Montana. You could tell it was a touchdown as soon as the ball left his hand.
Anyone remember a guy named Unitas though ? He called his own frickin plays - and was tough as anyone who ever played .
I rank those two #1.

Brady (maybe needs one more excellent year) in the top 5 with Bradshaw .
The rest depend on the era and the day
Bart Starr was great. Sid Luckman ?
Aikman,( Staubach too ?)
Marino and Elway sometime make it. Loved watching Stabler but not sure.
Manning, great but needs at least another Super Bowl.
Leaving out many but it's dinner time.

Mule 09-18-2007 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Garfield (Post 3486096)
As far as Mule bashing Belichick - you couldn't be more wrong. He is the complete opposite of being a pompous ass, he might come off that way only because he doesn't get involved in all of the press BS

Do you mean like when he went out to mid field & acted like a complete ***** to Mangini? Classy like that? You mean like wearing that raggedy hoody. classy like that? Do you mean like cheating after having been warned, classy like that?

Look, I understand that he wins and is a hell of a coach. I also understand that Ray Lewis is the best linebacker ever to lace up cleats. Butkus couldn't carry his jock. This doesn't change the fact that Belichick is a pompous ********* & Ray was very involved in a drive by killing :eek:. Just call a spade a spade.:cool: Your coach is a *****, but he wins. We have no argument!

Mule 09-18-2007 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sammyg2 (Post 3486138)
I always thought Bradshaw could have been a linebacker. That guy was tough. Kinda like Bret Favre. They both can get in the face of the defensive linemen without getting intimidated.

What's your opinion of Steve Young?
Granted he had great recievers and a pretty good line, but really didn't have a spectacular running back to support him and he was still sucessfull.
For some reason he doesn't get quite as much press as his stats should get him. Lots of other quarterbacks had a better rep with worse stats. Maybe it's because he was a running QB instead of a pure pocket passer?
I don't think he was as good of a field general as Montana but being able to take off and run got him out of alot of trouble.
I know when he first came back to the NFL after that other football league folded (world?) some folks resented him becausse of the huge salary he got over there. He didn't have the personality of some of the others, maybe that hurt him.

Agreed again. More talent, not quite the field general. Favre & Elway I never really cared for because they threw 5 yd passes at 100mph and had very little touch.

Jim Garfield 09-18-2007 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mule (Post 3486150)
Do you mean like when he went out to mid field & acted like a complete ***** to Mangini? Classy like that?

You do know that Belichick taught Mangini everything that he knows and the little, er.. fat twerp stabbed him in the back? I wouldn't shake his hand either. Belichick was pissed and rightly so. And does the sweatshirt really bother you?? Do you mean classy like a pinky ring?

Mule 09-18-2007 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jim Garfield (Post 3486175)
You do know that Belichick taught Mangini everything that he knows and the little, er.. fat twerp stabbed him in the back? I wouldn't shake his hand either. Belichick was pissed and rightly so. And does the sweatshirt really bother you?? Do you mean classy like a pinky ring?

Stabbed who in the back? Do you mean like the tactics bill uses to keep payroll down? It's business dude, and it's not a one way street. I'm guessing you make less than Bill. Try showing up for work tomorrow looking like that. And you're not on national TV. I mean classy like a pimp hat:D.

JCF 09-18-2007 04:11 PM

Young !

Forgot him. As good as Aikman and Elway.
Favre - him I didn't forget, just don't think he's a top 10.

Dude - You realize it (sports) IS business. Big business.
That's why Justice,Clemens, Damon, A-Rod (If he goes to the Sox next year I will never watch another baseball game) go to the Yankees.

Sonic dB 09-18-2007 04:51 PM

Quote:

A little reference material for you Pattys. When Montana won his 1st Super Bowl he did it throwing to household names like Earl Cooper & Mike Wilson. Brady's very good but he's no Joe
Hey Mule... don't forget about Dwight Clark and Freddie Solomon who were
Joe's wide outs his first couple of years...before the greatest receiver
ever, Jerry Rice showed up, and John Taylor too... Brent Jones etc.

So compare, Dwight Clark, Freddie Solomen, Earl Cooper & Mike Wilson

to the guys that Brady Threw to in his first Super Bowl Winning Season:

80 Troy Brown WR/PR - good player, not great
84 Fred Coleman - who?
15 Jimmy Farris UR - double who?
81 Charles Johnson - who?
86 David Patten - decent, disappeared after he left Brady


So there you go: Both Joe Montana and Tom Brady won their first Super Bowls
by basically throwing to marginal wide receivers....

heck, Id take Dwight Clark and Freddie Solomon over the 2001 Pats WRs any day.

PS: Troy Aikman has no place in discussing the top 10 QBs of all time.
He was a good QB, and a good manager of the game + good leader....
but he was never a dominating performer on the field, had tons of talent
around him, and his career ended prematurely as well.

JCF 09-18-2007 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sonic dB (Post 3486315)

PS: Troy Aikman has no place in discussing the top 10 QBs of all time.
He was a good QB, and a good manager of the game + good leader....
but he was never a dominating performer on the field, had tons of talent
around him, and his career ended prematurely as well.

Maybe not. Maybe #10.
But you don't win three SB's without a better than good QB.
"Good manager of the game, good leader", effective passer - It is not just about stats.
Notice NO ONE is mentioning Dan Fouts.
And Marino is marginal.

Red Baron 09-18-2007 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Porsche-O-Phile (Post 3485378)
There's a HUGE difference between taking a few video clips of signals (which are varied normally every half anyway) and shooting up steroids your whole career in order to inflate your numbers. In the former case, it's a marginal advantage at best, in the latter it can take a decent player and turn them into a record-breaking gorilla.

You're right, there is a huge difference...the Patriots were actually caught red handed cheating and everything in regards to Bonds is rumor or hear-say. Love him or hate him, Bonds put up stellar numbers long before any steroid allegations.

How many SB did the Pats win before Bellicheat? They were such a Dynasty before that, right?

I guess it's ok to cheat if it's the team or guy your fond of however everyone else gets an *

And fwiw steroids by themselves have never made a decent athlete a record breaking gorilla. You either have skills and train hard or you don't. The best thing a regimine of steroids or HGH could do is help recover from an injury or keep you peaking when the body clock is starting to work against you... Since that's an entire different topic in itself, I'll leave it at that.

mattdavis11 09-18-2007 06:19 PM

#1 all time has to be Sammy Baugh. No Sammy, no passing, and the rest would have never made history.

Brady is average at best. Had it not have been for Bledsoe going down, he'd be Ryan Leaf's croquet partner.

Mule 09-18-2007 06:45 PM

Brady's pretty damn good. Based on record, he's the best in the league. Hilarious! No dude, Ryan Leaf needs a therapy partner. He's more unbalanced than the Geico cave man. Slingin' Sammy? I don't know, athletes are on a different scale now.

Red Baron 09-18-2007 07:07 PM

Johnny Unitas

He's a Pro's Pro when it comes to the QB position.

My modern day favorites are #4, P. Manning, Steve Young and Rich Gannon

Red Baron 09-18-2007 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mattdavis11 (Post 3486482)
#1 all time has to be Sammy Baugh. No Sammy, no passing, and the rest would have never made history.

Brady is average at best. Had it not have been for Bledsoe going down, he'd be Ryan Leaf's croquet partner.

Bledsoe would have had to "go down" ON Belicheat to keep that job. Is Bledsoe even on a roster this season?

onewhippedpuppy 09-18-2007 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Baron (Post 3486392)
And fwiw steroids by themselves have never made a decent athlete a record breaking gorilla. You either have skills and train hard or you don't. The best thing a regimine of steroids or HGH could do is help recover from an injury or keep you peaking when the body clock is starting to work against you... Since that's an entire different topic in itself, I'll leave it at that.

BS. Bonds was a great hitter, but not a power hitter. Also a perennial gold-glover. He was a good ballplayer, and would have probably made it into the hall without cheating. Steroids turned his focus 180 deg, his focus became home-runs. He was talented before, steroids amplified that.

Red Baron 09-19-2007 02:30 AM

BS huh? So Bonds never trained hard while he was supposedly on roids?

onewhippedpuppy 09-19-2007 03:45 AM

Honestly, do you even read responses, or just enough that you realize somebody doesn't agree with you? I stated before, he was an excellent baseball player, probably hall of fame bound. But, he was not a power hitter. All of a sudden, somewhat late in his career, he got HUGE and started hitting the ball 500 feet. That doesn't just "happen".

http://r_harrison.tripod.com/Agonist/BarryBonds.jpg

For God's sake, they look like two different people!

Red Baron 09-19-2007 04:20 AM

You have your wires crossed. I ask a simple question about if he trained or not and you go on some tangent about what I agree, disagree, read or whatever... Was the question just to hard for you to answer?

So he changed ONLY because he supposedly did steroids? Not because he trained differently?

Either way the Patriot SB victories should have an * next to them if Bonds records do.

onewhippedpuppy 09-19-2007 04:54 AM

I have no doubt he trained hard, what is your point? I'm sure he trained hard since becoming a professional baseball player. That typically goes without saying for a good professional athelete. It doesn't change the fact that he probably doubled his muscle mass, in a very short period of time, and at a relatively late stage in his career.

So you want a straght answer? Yes, he changed because he did steroids, period. I've heard/seen interviews with experts on multiple shows, and they all have the same opinion.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.