Blown coolant line.....Another reason to HATE @#$%$# Audis

[126coupe]

Originally Posted by the

More important than CAN drive them the rest of your life, they are the types of cars you'd WANT to drive the rest of your life.

Who in their right mind would want to drive an 80s or 90s Audi for even a day? Yuck.

I drive my wifes 420 SEL to SF all the time to visit my daughter in college.
I love the look on people faces when I fly by at 95 MPH with one hand on the wheel.
Its like I am sitting in my living room. The thing just wont break, oh yeah I had a flat tire a couple of years ago. By the way I get 20-24 MPH in this boat. What a cruiser.
One of the head engineers at MB loves the 126 Chassis.. 1982-1991. Last of the real MB's

[therotman]

Originally Posted by Minkoff

Last of the real MB's

so the new ones suck, right?

[Porsche-O-Phile]

Replacing the entire front end of an Audi to replace a coolant hose qualifies you for 951 ownership. But only if you can get through the procedure with less than two tools lost forever in the bowels of the engine and less than five cuss-words used. Good luck.

[speeder]

Originally Posted by therotman

so the new ones suck, right?

They are supposedly getting a little better, but the early 2000s MBs are absolutely junk. As big of a lemon-soaked POS as any Audi. I have an enormous amount of experience w/ MB cars, I've probably owned 20 of them from early '60s to '90s, my Dad bought new ones from mid-'70s on and ex-GF owned every S-class new from early '80s to 2008.

The 2001 S500 was in the shop all the time for issues minor and major, and it was not an anomaly. I swear those cars were built by the Chrysler division.

Audi had some bad years quality-wise, I think your 2000 falls squarely in that era. Their '80s cars were not bad, and they have had some really strong models, believe it or not.

[beepbeep]

I have UrS4 and had to do lot's of fixing before I got it working. It's a overly complicated car (probably THE most complicated of any cars I owned) and I had to remove the front for just about any engine work.

After all work done I really like the car. It's quiet, fast and very safe with 4WD.

But yes, It's PITA to work on. I chose to see it as an challenge to fix this car. After numerous issues were done (converting hideous UFO-brakes to discs, fixing ignition, changing radiator, fluids and numerous sensors, relays, hoses and coolant hoses to name the few) car became issue-free. But they do require patience, time and technical mind to work on.

[Langers]

Originally Posted by BGCarrera32

I feel your pain...my alternator went on my 99.5 Audi A4, same thing, off came the whole front end. You can't get it out the bottom, the top, or the side, you gotta pull the whole front end off exactly like your pictures. I missed about 5 hours with my kids on a Saturday night f*&^*(& around with that thing and now I drive a Ford Focus with a warranty. Lame, but easy to fix.

I truly believe Audi makes a precision, solid, stellar looking, OVERLY COMPLICATED automobile.

The next German sedan will be an older 300 series Mercedes or BMW.

You all seem to be making a great big fuss about nothing. Pulling the front clip off the car to do any major work is par for the course on VAG vehicles. An experienced mechanic can have the front off in less than an hour. Not the end of the world...

[Tim Hancock]

Originally Posted by Porsche-O-Phile

Replacing the entire front end of an Audi to replace a coolant hose qualifies you for 951 ownership. But only if you can get through the procedure with less than two tools lost forever in the bowels of the engine and less than five cuss-words used. Good luck.

Ha! My 951, while fairly tight to work on, is built much better. Replacing the clutch was a very large job, but still better to work on than the Audi.

[Tim Hancock]

Originally Posted by javadog

I find it funny that someone gripes about a coolant hose needing to be changed after nearly 140,000 miles. Reckon that hose is original?

I find it even more ironic that Tim suggests that he should have bought a BMW instead. Yeah, the brand that is infamous for the newer generation of radiators failing about every 60-70,000 miles.

I've owned a slew of Audis, BMWs, Mercedes, etc. and I can tell you that Audis aren't worse than the rest. Go buy an S-class Benz and see what happens.

Sorry for your pain, sort of...
JR

My BMW has 285,000 miles on it with it's original, clutch, alternator (voltage reg brushes replaced), AC compressor, PS pump, starter etc.

I replaced the radiator once (pretty simple). It still has most of it's original hoses and drives out perfect. Repairs have been minor and it gets 26-27 mpg.

My older watercooled P-cars have most of their original hoses also.

[Tim Hancock]

Originally Posted by BGCarrera32

Your next annoyance is indicated by the red arrows.

The bolt indicated by the green arrow will require heat, an air chisel, possibly drilling, and some potty mouth to remove.

Actually I have replaced upper control arms on both sides already. That bolt was a b@stard! The new one went in with Never-Sieze! A lot of that also had to come apart to simply change a CV boot. Installing the Eibach suspension kit in this car was definitely alot tougher than the Bilstein sport kit I installed in my BMW.

[javadog]

Originally Posted by Tim Hancock

My BMW has 285,000 miles on it with it's original, clutch, alternator (voltage reg brushes replaced), AC compressor, PS pump, starter etc.

I replaced the radiator once (pretty simple). It still has most of it's original hoses and drives out perfect. Repairs have been minor and it gets 26-27 mpg.

My older watercooled P-cars have most of their original hoses also.

I have had great experiences with Audis. I've owned 11 of them and still own 5. The oldest one in the fleet is an '83 and the youngest is an '04. I've also owned 7 BMWs (still have 4 of them) and 4 Benzes (1 left.) Here's my take:

I have had the best luck with Audis that I bought new. No issues, ever, with those. Those that were bought used have had a few issues, although I can usually blame the technician that worked on them as much as the car. Still, no large expenses on any of them, ever.

The BMWs have never really let me down, they have just nickel-and-dimed me to death. The older cars are better than the new ones. Much better. I wouldn't own a modern BMW.

The Benzes have been the most expensive to own, by a long shot. Lots of things failed and they are more expensive to fix than a P-car. Rack up 100k miles on an S-class and add up the bills. You'll crap your pants.

Another thing, cars are getting a lot harder to work on, as the manufacturers cram more and more crap into smaller spaces. They all do it. As an aircraft guy, I'd have thought you were quite used to doing pain-in-the-ass jobs in tight spaces.

JR

[lendaddy]

When I sold Tim this Audi I did so because I came to the realization there was NOTHING I could work on myself. Every time a sensor went out it was a trip to the dealer. The last straw was when I wanted to check the turbos to see if they were a certain s/n or something and realized that I COULD NOT EVEN SEE THEM!!!!! Fellas, this thing has two of them and you can't even catch a glimpse. This is what Tim is saying, not that he expects hoses to last forever, just that seemingly zero consideration was given to ease of maintenance in the design stages.

[javadog]

Originally Posted by lendaddy

This is what Tim is saying, not that he expects hoses to last forever, just that seemingly zero consideration was given to ease of maintenance in the design stages.

Ever worked on a 928? Adjusted the valves on a 930? Changed a 944 clutch?

JR

[lendaddy]

Originally Posted by javadog

Ever worked on a 928? Adjusted the valves on a 930? Changed a 944 clutch?

JR

I have adjusted the valves on my 930 several times, I didn't think that was a big deal at all outside of getting the feel down on the blades.

[javadog]

The point about the 930 valve adjsutment is all the crap that needs to come off before you get access to anything. If you've ever done the same job on a carb'd 911, you'll see how much harder it is to do the same job on a 930. I'm talking about one that still has A/C, the air pump and lines, etc. It takes longer to get to the valves on a 930 than to adjust them on an early 911.

My point was really that an Audi isn't worse (overall) to work on than other cars. It's just a sign of the times. Compare a twin turbo Audi with a twin turbo Porsche or Benz. Apples to apples.

JR

[onewhippedpuppy]

Not all early Audis suck.





I would do notty, notty things to get my hands on a RS2. Really, the '90s S4 and S6 have a decent reputation for reliablility IF TAKEN CARE OF. The turbo 5-cylinder will run forever, and can make silly power with a few RS2 mods.

With that said, after owning an Audi A4, BMW 325 and 540, and now my C36, the MB wins hands-down for quality. Little stuff that would need replaced on the other cars, like the power seat switches, just needed a cleaning to spring back to life. It's hewn from solid granite, and thus far very straightforward and easy to work on. Plus, it's the first one that won't need every suspension bushing replaced at 100k.

Ultimately though, I have to agree with Jeff. The 951 is a car for sadists. I wonder how many tools and fasteners the current owners have found in that abyss of an engine bay?

[Tim Hancock]

Originally Posted by javadog

Another thing, cars are getting a lot harder to work on, as the manufacturers cram more and more crap into smaller spaces. They all do it. As an aircraft guy, I'd have thought you were quite used to doing pain-in-the-ass jobs in tight spaces.

JR

The AWD twin turbo Audi wins the pain in the @ss to work on award hands down compared to every other car/airplane I have ever worked on. While pulling the bumper and lock carrier off is not rocket science, the fact that it has to come off for service to any accessory on the front of the engine is just frustrating. While many modern cars are complex, quattro Audis which are bought by people to use as daily drivers (not exotic weekend sports cars) have just too many areas that are difficult/time consuming to work on IMO. I have yet to have any car, airplane or motorcycle that I could not fix.

While my Audi has had a few more issues than my E36 BMW did when it had similar miles, my main gripe is with the relative difficulty of servicing it compared to other vehicles. My wife really wanted AWD when I bought it, but now after the Audi has failed on her numerous times, she wants a BMW again. She is currently driving her old BMW (my daily 80 mile roundtrip driver) while I am working on the Audi again and says she trusts it more than the Audi and wishes she would have believed me when I told her the BMW still had many good years left in it.

Another downside to the Audi in our situation is that almost all of our other cars are manuals. On the rare occasion that one has had a problem in the past, I have been able to tow it home with a tow strap. When the Audi has stranded her, I had to have it flatbedded home. Sure other brand automatics would be the same, but in my situation it is just one more strike against the Audi.

[javadog]

Tim,

You keep comparing a modern Audi with a previous generation BMW. I've changed all the coolant hoses on an early 90's Audi with no problems. Nothing had to come off of the car to get to them. My point was that the new cars all have a lot more crammed into them and they are harder to work on as a result.

Maybe it was all of the @#$%&* in the thread title that I felt was undeserved. It reminded me of a guy named Jim something-or-other....


JR

[126coupe]

Originally Posted by therotman

so the new ones suck, right?

I suggested to the shop that does some maintenance on my MB's (I do most of it myself) my wife wants a early 90's 500SL. They said "don't do it" In fact keep your 126's.
1992-mid 2000's are nightmares. Electronics especially.

[Tim Hancock]

Originally Posted by javadog

Tim,

You keep comparing a modern Audi with a previous generation BMW. I've changed all the coolant hoses on an early 90's Audi with no problems. Nothing had to come off of the car to get to them. My point was that the new cars all have a lot more crammed into them and they are harder to work on as a result.

Maybe it was all of the @#$%&* in the thread title that I felt was undeserved. It reminded me of a guy named Jim something-or-other....


JR

I have work on an old college friend's E46 and it definitely easier to work on compared to the Audi. If you think #%$%#@%@#$ is bad, you really don't want to get me going on the "big 3" US auto makers

Like I said, I needed to vent, but I would rather change an alternator, PS pump, PS rack, AC compressor, CV boot, halfshaft etc on most any car vs an Audi quattro any day YMMV.

[speeder]

Javadog, just curious; why do you own 10 (fairly ordinary) cars at one time? I used to have large stables myself, so just wondering.