![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
964 Turbo 3.3 vs 3.6?
Are there any differences between these two engines other than the displacement? Is the 3.6 significantly better than the 3.3 for any reason?
|
||
![]() |
|
PRO Motorsports
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 4,580
|
Yes.
The 3.6 is based on the 964 engine. The 3.3 is just the same 930 engine as always, carried over into the new car. They both have CIS though.
__________________
'69 911E coupe' RSR clone-in-progress (retired 911-Spec racer) '72 911T Targa MFI 2.4E spec(Formerly "Scruffy") 2004 GT3 |
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
Both being the 3.3 and the 930.....%^B
Hey Tyson, when ya coming up here?
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
PRO Motorsports
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 4,580
|
Mike, he's wondering about the difference between the '91 C2 Turbo engine, which is a 3.3., and the '94 Turbo 3.6 engine.
The Turbo 3.6 is a beast compared to the '91 with the 3.3. Much less turbo-lag, and overall power. Better driveability too.
__________________
'69 911E coupe' RSR clone-in-progress (retired 911-Spec racer) '72 911T Targa MFI 2.4E spec(Formerly "Scruffy") 2004 GT3 |
||
![]() |
|
Crotchety Old Bastard
|
Mike - ya just might have a better chance gettin' Tyson to visit if you change that avatar.........
![]()
__________________
RarlyL8 Motorsports / M&K Exhaust - 911/930 Exhaust Systems, Turbos, TiAL, CIS Mods/Rebuilds '78 911SC Widebody, 930 engine, 915 Tranny, K27, SC Cams, RL8 Headers & GT3 Muffler. 350whp @ 0.75bar Brian B. (256)536-9977 Service@MKExhaust Brian@RarlyL8 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
![]() Quote:
And then you kickem up to a 3.8L ![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Thanks! Don Ramsay E Mail: aircooledclassicsporsche@gmail.com The father of 964 Backdating! ![]() www.aircooledclassics.co www.facebook.com/AirCooledClassicsPorsche/ www.instagram.com/aircooledclassicsporsche/ |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: louisville, ky.
Posts: 37
|
rarlyl8, "OB" like me, isn't the sheep just basking at the beach? tjn/vettekiller
__________________
tjn/vettekiller |
||
![]() |
|
RETIRED
|
Quote:
__________________
1983/3.6, backdate to long hood 2012 ML350 3.0 Turbo Diesel |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Planet earth
Posts: 867
|
Tyson,
3.6 is 360 HP/340 tq and 3.3 is 320 HP/324 TQ with both cars 0-60 in 4.8 sec so i have no idea Quote:
![]() I drove both cars back to back,yes i drove them twice back to back just to feel the difference and no i didn't feel any difference at all. Bottom line: NO OVER ALL POWER DIFFERENCE,NO DIFFERENT DRIVEABILITY BUT YES POSSIBLY SLIGHTLY LESS TURBO LAG ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Automotive Monomaniac
|
Oh, I may add...
The 3.3-liter Turbo has manual steering, no ABS, no airbags. ![]() The 3.6-liter Turbo has power steering, ABS, airbags, and weighs 200+ pounds more. ![]()
__________________
2018 - Porsche 911 Carrera 7MT / 2018 - Porsche Macan 7DCT / 1993 - Cadillac Allante / 2023 - RAM TRX (on order) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
Quote:
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 123
|
By '94, were earlier '89-'91 issues with the 3.6--seals, head gaskets, distributor belt/venting--cleared up in the Turbo version?
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Automotive Monomaniac
|
Quote:
__________________
2018 - Porsche 911 Carrera 7MT / 2018 - Porsche Macan 7DCT / 1993 - Cadillac Allante / 2023 - RAM TRX (on order) |
||
![]() |
|
PRO Motorsports
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 4,580
|
Quote:
Sounds like you're going off of the conservative factory claims. Car and Driver, Road and Track, etc. all were getting 3.9 to 4.2 0-60 times with the Turbo 3.6. I've driven them both as well, and the '91 seemed slower than a pre-90 930. I was underwhelmed. The Turbo 3.6 on the other hand felt like the power matched the chassis.
__________________
'69 911E coupe' RSR clone-in-progress (retired 911-Spec racer) '72 911T Targa MFI 2.4E spec(Formerly "Scruffy") 2004 GT3 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 564
|
If you put an open style intake and a quality aftermarket exhaust (headers not required)the lag is reduced greatly,especially when humidity levels are low.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 846
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
So what I'm hearing is that I should buy and modify a Turbo 964 3.3
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
Thanks! Don Ramsay E Mail: aircooledclassicsporsche@gmail.com The father of 964 Backdating! ![]() www.aircooledclassics.co www.facebook.com/AirCooledClassicsPorsche/ www.instagram.com/aircooledclassicsporsche/ |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oxford, Ct.
Posts: 2,297
|
I have to respecfully disagree with Don and Tyson on this. I owned a 91 3.3 that I had the pleasure of PCA racing last year. I have a Porsche exclusive repair shop in Ct. and have probably 8-9 3.3s and 3-4 3.6 964 Turbos that we maintain/race and track prep. In stock form the 3.6s are noticably quicker however I think a 3.3 with headers and a good muffler (Hooker aero flow or Borla XR10 for example) will definitely outrun a stock 3.6. When you add in the fact that there is a STEEP price premium for 3.6s I think the 3.3 is the smart buy. I've also owned and worked on many 930s and IMHO there's no comparison The 965 does everything better. My current car is a 04 GT3 and I honestly think my 91 965 was a more exciting car to drive.
Dan Jacobs
__________________
07 GT3 Cup S 4.0, 00 986, 78 911 old school gt car 77 BMW R100S 99 Ducati 996S 04 BMW R1150R DanielJacobsLLC.com |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Thanks for everyone's input. My main concern was whether or not the 3.6 was a lot better than the 3.3 for whatever reason. It sounds like it has a marginal advantage, but not enough to justify the increase in price and nothing that can't be solved with basic upgrades.
Now I just have to decide between the 964 and an Elise... *ducks* |
||
![]() |
|