![]() |
|
|
|
Irrationally exuberant
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, building up an earlier motor is more fun than plopping in a 3.6, just not as cost effective. -Chris
__________________
'80 911 Nogaro blue Phoenix! '07 BMW 328i 245K miles! http://members.rennlist.org/messinwith911s/ |
||
![]() |
|
Moderator
|
Quote:
If you want a reliable, civilized, torquey motor w/ knock sensors, high compression etc. go 3.6, If you want to modify, consider what it is that you want when you are done. A modified big motor will always beat a simlarly modified small motor, given that the weight difference between the lightest 2.4 and heaviest 3.6 isn't all that great. Keep in mind that the further from stock you go, other systems will often need to be modified If you enjoy the process only and are happy w/ what the motor was like when new , do a rebuild.
__________________
Bill Verburg '76 Carrera 3.6RS(nee C3/hotrod), '95 993RS/CS(clone) | Pelican Home |Rennlist Wheels |Rennlist Brakes | |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: London UK
Posts: 690
|
I went with a non-vram for my conversion & I'm very happy with it + thats in a fat pig carerra.
As others have noted its easy to upset a lot of more modern cars with this conversion and thats with the 3.6 in stock form, if you find a good engine at a reasonable price then you have an even better platform to move forwards with. Heres a vid of mine on the dyno to help you make your mind up: http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-5459873911545893667&q=porsche+dyno+test
__________________
'89 3.2/3.6 coupe |
||
![]() |
|