![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Leuven, Belgium. Home of Stella-Artois
Posts: 665
|
Anybody else upgrade from a 964 to a 911 (3.2)
I had two C4's in the past until I bought my present 3.2. Anybody else done this ?
I guess the other way around is more common. ![]()
__________________
Champaign and Burgundy 3.2 (1986) Ex-C4 91 Ex C4 93 A8 3.0 TDI X5 |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
I now drive a 1978 SC... I used to own a 1992 C2...
I lost that as part of a divorce settlement. I've never looked back ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: I be home in CA
Posts: 7,685
|
Been there done that. Did you get a t-shirt or just the enema?
__________________
Dan |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
No just the Enema... had i got the T Shirt I'd have something to show for it...lol
Recently I was driving some were with my eldest daughter... She said. Dad it's impossible to be unhappy when you're in this car! ![]() All three of my children live with me. ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
sudo apt-get purge 930
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Brandon, FL
Posts: 4,838
|
Sounds like you got the best part of the divorce.
![]()
__________________
Mark 1979 930 Euro ***GONE AND DON'T MISS IT AT ALL*** "Worrying about depreciation on your car and keeping mileage down is like not ****ing your girlfriend so her next boyfriend finds her more appealing" --clutch-monkey |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: I be home in CA
Posts: 7,685
|
__________________
Dan |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Almost Banned Once
|
I absolutely did
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
I went from this
![]() to this ![]() not uncomon
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
I followed the same pattern........
I went from this: ![]() to this:
__________________
1987 Carrera Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Ruby911
|
I upgraded and further than that.....
from this ![]() to this ![]()
__________________
1984 Carrera - SW Chip, Factory Short Shift Kit, Cat Bypass - SOLD 1968 Ossi Blue 912 Sunroof Coupe - SOLD 1971 911E - 2.7 Twin Plugged, PMOs - SOLD 1965 356C Outlaw RGruppe #577 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 543
|
|||
![]() |
|
"O Gruppe 13"
|
From 92
![]() to 86 ![]()
__________________
Gytis 89 964 C4 86 930 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 228
|
Why the change from a 964 to a 3.2? I have a 3.2, and am thinking of looking for a 964, but would like to know the advantages of a 3.2 versus a 964.
Give me reasons to never want to look for another 911! Hey, I love her, but I always think the grass is greener on the other side.
__________________
Wurls 1995 993 Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
"wurls Why the change from a 964 to a 3.2? I have a 3.2, and am thinking of looking for a 964, but would like to know the advantages of a 3.2 versus a 964.
Give me reasons to never want to look for another 911! Hey, I love her, but I always think the grass is greener on the other side. " The 3.2 is a much simpler car. Easier to fix and in my opinion more fun to drive. Manual as opposed to power steering and generally lighter. It's like comparing an RS to an S from the seventies. Then if you decide to "back date' the car it's always a viable option with a 3.2. (or SC as in my case) My 964 was a great car but I never felt confident doing work on it myself. I love my SC... It's a great car to work on. Although in my experience I must say Porsche's don't suffer fools. You could backdate a 964... and I'm sure it has been done. But it seems to make more sense to back date the impact bumper cars. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Long Island N.Y
Posts: 759
|
[QUOTE=wurls;4540519]Why the change from a 964 to a 3.2? I have a 3.2, and am thinking of looking for a 964, but would like to know the advantages of a 3.2 versus a 964.
Give me reasons to never want to look for another 911! Wurls, here's a good thread for you. You really need to drive a (C2 manual coupe) back to back with a 3.2 and then make up your mind. 911 vs. 964 comparison Dan |
||
![]() |
|
MBruns for President
|
I got tired of all the electrical crap = sensors - battery drain - seemed like it was always something that was tripping that damn ! warning.
It was (964) a fast car though - when you were going 110 it felt like 70 - conversely it's the other way around in the 911.
__________________
Current Whip: - 2003 996 Twin Turbo - 39K miles - Lapis Blue/Grey Past: 1974 IROC (3.6) , 1987 Cabriolet (3.4) , 1990 C2 Targa, 1989 S2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
+1 to sc_rufctr
+1 to JeremyD IMO the 911 is a more "raw" fun driving experience. Plus my 964 leaked like a Great Dane on a walk. Nothing money couldn't fix - but why when I could own a 911 with a G50.
__________________
1987 Carrera Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 228
|
Thanks for the input guys! The 3.2 does seem like a better choice than 964, for the type of person (like me) that hates the thought of there being an electrical nightmare waiting to happen with a 964. True, the 964 might be snappier from torque, but if you live in a place like me where you're lucky to have one place that can fix a Porsche, the simpler the 911, the better.
My 1988 3.2 Carrera is now going to stay with me! Cheers guys!
__________________
Wurls 1995 993 Coupe |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Long Beach CA, the sewer by the sea.
Posts: 37,758
|
Carreras are not immune to electrical issues. You want a car you can fix by the side of the road? Get an early carb'd T. 70 will feel like 110.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 510
|
Quote:
3.2s are full of electronic sensors, but there's no diagnostic capability.
__________________
1986 Targa 1968 MGB (2) |
||
![]() |
|