![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
Depends what you mean by "significantly". I follow current sales and see anywhere from a $10K-$20K differential based on low mileage excellent condition cars. As the miles go up and the condition goes down it washes out....I doubt that there will ever be a much greater difference than that.
However, my gut says that more slants will be kept original and treated a bit more special by their owners than regular 930's that wind up getting resold and modded for performance. That would help widen the gap potentially.....It's one of those things where condition will be the driver and when you narrow it down to the remaining excellent cars there will be enough buyers who appreciate slants to keep that differential in play.
__________________
'73 914 2.0, '74 911 Coupe, '74 911 Targa '78 924, '84 944, '86 944 Turbo, '84 911 Coupe '84 944 (current), '96 993 Coupe (current) '73 911T Coupe (current) '88 930S M505 (current) |
||
![]() |
|
Former Options Trader !!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 6,756
|
I dont see any slants going for 20k over their counter parts. I believe even 10k is a bit of a stretch. All classics will be judged on condition as part of their pricing.
As far as which cars will be kept original and which will be modded its really just silly to say that a slant vs. a non slant will be modded more or less. Same goes for which will be treated more special by their owners. Your gut speaks with a heavy bias for your own reasons. If you take your opinion out of the statistical equation I am pretty darn sure the numbers of modded slants vs. non slants in % terms will be equal. What % of the slants out there are not factory? One done with parts from the factory is not a real factory car. I am sure there will be a premium for the slant over the regular car in the future, but as both become more rare I believe that premium will shrink. I am speaking as a trader with no opinion on the market’s direction just the value of the commodity as I would if I were still standing in any options pit in the world. Your perspective, and I respect your personal opinion, is skewed.
__________________
Current:88 Guards Red Coupe, 89 Coupe Track Rat, 76 Caddy Eldo Convert. 2015 Aprilia Tuono Wrecked 1987 Targa Guards Red, 2003 Ducati ST4S Sold 1987 Granite Green Targa, 993's, 93 RSA, other 964 coupes, 89 911 Turbo Ruf mods, 90 e30 M3, 07 BMW R1200S STOLEN 94 Speedster |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tidewater Va
Posts: 671
|
Slant conversions are not equal in value to a factory slant. Never will be. In reference to the Miami Vice Daytona, those were affected too. Talk to a Daytona spyder owner whose Daytona started life as a coupe, but because of Miami Vice now is a spyder. Many were converted. Thats a serious value hit.
Bastards are bastards which may be ok, but an abortion like the one that started this thread should be left where found in the dumpster. P.S. Dont forget Vanilla Ice helped the slant nose image too.
__________________
75 911s 86 951 sold to make room for baby seat 09 335i 6MT NVH |
||
![]() |
|
Former Options Trader !!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 6,756
|
I have seen that nasty ugly Vanilla Ice white slant whatever come up for sale a number of times over the years. Sad for the sucker who buys it.
__________________
Current:88 Guards Red Coupe, 89 Coupe Track Rat, 76 Caddy Eldo Convert. 2015 Aprilia Tuono Wrecked 1987 Targa Guards Red, 2003 Ducati ST4S Sold 1987 Granite Green Targa, 993's, 93 RSA, other 964 coupes, 89 911 Turbo Ruf mods, 90 e30 M3, 07 BMW R1200S STOLEN 94 Speedster |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Seems to me that the Daytona’s have seen a lot of ups and downs over the years, including the cutting off of the roofs that was mentioned – and all the Corvettes that were converted (as I think the original Miami Vice car was a Corvette IIRC). But I think it’s the bling of the Slantnoses that set them apart. The Daytona styling is more subdued, which should help its longevity. I think you could better equate the Slantnose to the Testarossa with the flashy side trim. I think the Testarossa’s values have been struggling. In my opinion, this is due to the style of the car being tied to an era rather than being a more classic and timeless style.
__________________
Rex 1975 911s and 2012 Range Rover Sport HSE 1995 BMW R1100RS, 1948 Harley FL |
||
![]() |
|
Former Options Trader !!!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bucks County PA
Posts: 6,756
|
Dont forget that Sony moved up to a Testarossa in later seasons, thats not helping their value either!
__________________
Current:88 Guards Red Coupe, 89 Coupe Track Rat, 76 Caddy Eldo Convert. 2015 Aprilia Tuono Wrecked 1987 Targa Guards Red, 2003 Ducati ST4S Sold 1987 Granite Green Targa, 993's, 93 RSA, other 964 coupes, 89 911 Turbo Ruf mods, 90 e30 M3, 07 BMW R1200S STOLEN 94 Speedster |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
i looked for a turbolook slant for several months. even looked at a few real turbo slopes. none passed a basic PPi. i gave up and bought a clean 85 targa from a Pelican . i am a car collector, and when my 308gtb Qv ferrari or one of my other cars sells, i will again look for a turbo look slope. the market is still based on cash in hand. bank are not loaning money. people with cash are holding on to it.
i was looking in the $20-29k cash range for a nice slopenose, and could not find a good car that was not butchered, or had stories. i detest red also, which also makes it hard for me to find cars. ( you know how hard it is to NOT buy a darn "red" Ferrari lol ! ) i too looked at the red slopenose in question in this thread, and thought it was a patchwork of parts. then there was the dealer in Florida with a car they swore was a real turbolook slant, that was not. i made sure i posted a whole thread on that car on ferrarichat in our Florida section as a warning. ( long story) i think the slopenose cars are beautiful, and turbo or not i am hoping to get one eventually! |
||
![]() |
|
muck-raker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Coastal PNW
Posts: 3,059
|
Quote:
yeah...I'm still waiting on the ever-elusive Brown Ferrari.
__________________
STONE '88 Cabriolet, using EP Slick 20w50 partial synthetic Snake Oil...just as Rommel intended. ![]() Deny Everything; Admit Nothing; and Always Make Counter-accusations ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: WA
Posts: 96
|
I guess we will all agree the value of a "real" factory slantnose in the correct 3 years they were actually produced off the line the first time would be more than a non slantnose. The problem becomes when an earlier car has the same look. This is where the car may or may not have the same value as a real one. If it was a special wishes car or not, factory parts or not, who owned the car that sent it to special wishes, etc. 90% of people who see the car have no idea if it is real or not, it is exotic to say the least. They are definately rare, fake or not due to the number of them that survive compared to all the other regular ones. Rare equals value. If you don't like them fine, just like I don't like yellow or green cars. I bought my slantnose conversion because it was a widebody, it just happens to have another mod as slantnose. Car companies rarely produce a car under 100k that doesn't look better with some sort of change like rims, better looking rubber, seats, stereo, lighting, etc. Question is how much do you modify it? Most stock cars are just plain boring.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 7,284
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Fat butt 911, 1987 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
![]() funny, my first 308 was marrone dino, a rootbeer brown color. had a purple 911 also for a while too. ![]() my QV is a very dark blue. back on topic, many of the slopenose cars i looked at had issues with the lights not lifting or working properly. not sure if this is common, or it was a symptom of aftermarket conversions. the wide body with the slopenose and rear vents looks stunning to me, but i really love 70s-80s cars. pre 70 and mid 90s cars do nothing for me, and i buy what i want. i think there is definately value added for a proper documented wide body slope. i should have bought that white one that was euro and on here or rennlist early this year. ![]() Last edited by THECARREAPER; 11-05-2009 at 01:58 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
83 911 Production Cab #10
|
![]()
[QUOTE=kidrock;4747934]P.S.---you have a vehicle known on this BBS as a "Frankenporsche" (this is not necessarily a derogatory term; no slight intended toward you or your vehicle.)
but Frankenporsche need love too... As for the value, like David Lettermen use to say; "who give a rat ass", she'll never have another owner ![]()
__________________
Who Will Live... Will See ![]() ![]() ![]() 83 911 Production Cab #10, Slightly Modified: Unslanted, 3.2, PMO EFI, TECgt, CE 911 CAM Sync / Pulley / Wires, SSI, Dansk Sport 2/2, 17" Euromeister, CKO GT3 Seats, Going SOK Super Charger |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
i personally think the only 930s that will command a premium will be the model with the 930 style front end i have no idea the factory code for it though but it looks amazing
__________________
1981 911sc Coupe "Valerie" Widebody 2001 Audi S4 Avant, "The Daily Booster!" 2001 Ducati 748 Biposto "The Torture Rack" 71 Chevrolet Corvette Roadster " The Moth Ball" |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
I'll go out on a limb here and say I like the look of the car. I would consider buying it at the right price because its unique...
The right price is about the same as an equivalent condition normal bodied 1980 SC. Which as you know in the US is a lot less than $22,900.00 So steer clear unless you can buy it for the right money. I wonder what the Slant Nose fenders, lights and hardware as a kit are worth ? (Weld on turbo flares) I bet you could get top dollar for that stuff. Lots of people out there love these cars. That alone could pay for the standard fenders lights and paint if you wanted to standardise the car before selling it. The one thing that can be said for this car is that it has lots of options open for the future.
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|
muck-raker
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Coastal PNW
Posts: 3,059
|
a vehicle's true value is that which the prospective buyer believes it is worth.
![]() back on thread...the posted vehicle looks like it's in pretty good shape. But the general consensus on this BBS is that it's probably not worth the $$$ being asked. There also seems to be a couple of questions regarding the authenticity of the statements being made by the seller. To me, that would be the biggest red flag as a buyer. Slantnose or no slantnose...it's a 911. Some people like them a lot, some not as much. If everybody liked the same thing, we'd all be driving Chevy Tahoe's with 22'' wheels...like they do here in Hell Paso. ![]()
__________________
STONE '88 Cabriolet, using EP Slick 20w50 partial synthetic Snake Oil...just as Rommel intended. ![]() Deny Everything; Admit Nothing; and Always Make Counter-accusations ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 862
|
Wow, I didn't mean to cause any controversy....anyway the car that started this thread is a "bastard" and I have no more interest in it... lol
![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Forced Induction Junkie
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Dave '85 930 Factory Special Wishes Flachbau Werk I Zuffenhausen 3.3l/330BHP Engine with Sonderwunsch Cams, FabSpeed Headers, Kokeln IC, Twin Plugged Electromotive Crankfire, Tial Wastegate(0.8 Bar), K27 Hybrid Turbo, Ruf Twin-tip Muffler, Fikse FM-5's 8&10x17, 8:41 R&P |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Lots of misinformation in this thread. The car is not a "Narrow Body" it has SC fenders early cars were Narrow, granted a full conversion probably should have included a wide-body kit.
The car also has a later engine out of a cab, look at the the pics, so it has had some upgrades.
__________________
78’ SC 911 Targa - 3.2SS, PMO 46, M&K 2/2 1 5/8” HEADERS, 123 DIST, PORTERFIELD R4-S PADS, KR75 CAMS, REBEL RACING BUSHINGS, KONI CLASSICS |
||
![]() |
|
Almost Banned Once
|
Quote:
__________________
- Peter |
||
![]() |
|