Pelican Parts Forums

Pelican Parts Forums (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/)
-   Porsche 911 Technical Forum (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/)
-   -   R-12 to R-134a parts. (http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/756307-r-12-r-134a-parts.html)

Bob Kontak 06-19-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by silberurs6 (Post 7506953)

i refuse to accept the assumption that the tev is completely closed.

+1

wwest 06-19-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 7506953)
Yes, this is part of the pressure change rate equation. You have to solve for one variable, then solve for another, then finally we can get an equation that tells us how the rate will change over time. Hotter and higher pressure? Higher flow through the orifice. But describing all that would actually be quite complicated. And really, let's focus on the one thing that seems to be the sticking point: That TEV.

Open, even a little? No pressure rise. Closed or blocked? Pressure rise.

I refuse to accept the assumption that the TEV is completely closed. And for a simple reason - the compressor works like a vacuum pump.

Yes, that's clearly a wrong assumption. Were the compressor to continue running with TXV fully closed one would expect to find a seriously maladjusted thermostatic switch. In normal operation those are pretty much exclusive conditions.

If the valve were all the way closed, then the low side could drop to 0psi.

Yes, but that would indicate a system malfunction.

But the assumption should be that the TXV and the thermstatic compressor operate somewhat in unison. As the evaporator gets colder and colder the TXV gets closer and closer to be closed. At the same time the thermostatic control switch is "at-the-ready" to open at 28F.

So, typically, just as the TXV goes fully closed the compressor circuit opens. It was that compressor cycle off that I was waiting for to know that the evaporator core was now at the coldest level to which it could be driven via the compressor. I switched the ignition off at that moment.

Thinking this through....at the moment I switch the ignition off..

1. The evaporator core and plenum area have been COLD SOAKED, evaporator core temperature at ~28F/25 PSI.

2. These is now NO cabin airflow passing through the evaporator to warm the existing "front-to-back" refrigerant charge.

3. The compressor is NOT pumping/running.

4.There is NO cooling airflow through either condensor.

What is the cooling capacity of the refrigerant charge now suddenly trapped, remaining within the evaporator core VOLUME. No "place" to "go" except via heating of he suction line itself.

So why would not the TXV go fully closed in short order?


And quickly. But it doesn't.

And you know this, factually? How, where..?

Even in a system not controlled by a pressure switch. That material has to be coming from somewhere, and the TEV is really the only answer.

...

kuehl 06-19-2013 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wwest (Post 7506336)
What is left to prove with a video at this point..? Kuehl (GTI) is in complete agreement with me that only extreme pressures result in our "non-barrier" hose leaking.

No. Wrong. YOUR non barrier hoses leak refrigerant 24/7 and 12 months a year, whether your AC system in on or not. And, the more you use it the more you use it.

That is why barrier hose was developed. And we know you can't afford barrier hoses.

But, as you said many times, in your climate you really don't drive your old 911 that often and you seldom use your AC system.

Your wife's Lexus does not qualify in the discussion.

kuehl 06-19-2013 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 7506953)

I refuse to accept the assumption that the TEV is completely closed. And for a simple reason - the compressor works like a vacuum pump. If the valve were all the way closed, then the low side could drop to 0psi. And quickly. But it doesn't. Even in a system not controlled by a pressure switch. That material has to be coming from somewhere, and the TEV is really the only answer.

Correct. The TEV in the 911/930 NEVER closes all the way when the compressor is pumping because the low side would pressure would go negative.. into vacuum.

And, you are Correct, again, the TEV in the 911/930 NEVER closes all the way when compressor is not pumping (system off), that is why the high and low side equalize when you turn the system off. This is the nature of this kind of TEV. There are TEV's that do close all the way but you won't find them in MAC (mobile air conditioning) applications.

wwest 06-19-2013 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7507156)
No. Wrong. YOUR non barrier hoses leak refrigerant 24/7 and 12 months a year, whether your AC system in on or not. And, the more you use it the more you use it.

That is why barrier hose was developed. And we know you can't afford barrier hoses.

But, as you said many times, in your climate you really don't drive your old 911 that often and you seldom use your AC system.

Your wife's Lexus does not qualify in the discussion.

You're BACK..!!

So did you write/compose the GTI "Extreme Pressure" info and have long since forgotton. Or was it someone else at GTI with more knowledge, experience, and overall knowhow. Maybe someone that took a few A/C theory of operation classes?

brads911sc 06-19-2013 05:23 PM

The issue wwest is that these are not linear. Right? Adding 35 degrees at the point you mention does not mean pressure will go up enough to have an impact. Lets say you are right for a moment and that it is linear. What would 35 degrees do to the pressure? If 120 degrees equals 250 psi then 155 degrees = 322 psi... But it can't be linear because the tev is going to start opening within the amount of time it took for your temps to rise to that level if it took two minutes. My guess that even it it did rise it would not exceed 300 psi which would not be blowing past orings and fittings. Would it?
It is just not logical for this to be the reason you lose refrigerant. It would need to rise much higher than 155 and much faster than 2 minutes to have a real impact would be my hypothesis.

kuehl 06-19-2013 05:41 PM

The bottom line Wwest is you are the only one that has to prove something.

And, from what you have written in the forum in the past year I'd say
you don't have the balls.

wwest 06-19-2013 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brads911sc (Post 7507182)
The issue wwest is that these are not linear. Right?

NO! I'm pretty sure I said "if"...:confused:

Adding 35 degrees at the point you mention does not mean pressure will go up enough to have an impact.

The point was to prove that the pressure goes UP post engine and A/C shutdown, and yes the amount I measured woulld not likely have an impact..? But what if OAT was 100F and with 93% humdity..?

Lets say you are right for a moment and that it is linear.

Again, I seem to remember leaving the issue of Non-linear or not up in the air.

What would 35 degrees do to the pressure? If 120 degrees equals 250 psi then 155 degrees = 322 psi... But it can't be linear because the tev is going to start opening within the amount of time it took for your temps to rise to that level if it took two minutes. My guess that even it it did rise it would not exceed 300 psi which would not be blowing past orings and fittings.

"..My guess.." educated guess or simple speculation.

Would it?

At this point, post GTI's "hose" input, o-rings and or fittings are not in the running. The indications are that R-12 would could exceed 350-450 PSI so I would expect R-134a to get there and beyond.

It is just not logical for this to be the reason you lose refrigerant. It would need to rise much higher than 155 and much faster than 2 minutes to have a real impact would be my hypothesis.

Think about my garden soaker hose...If the water supply is from our artesian well, 2-3 PSI, barely dribbles. Hook it up to the public water supply, >30 PSI, and it will soak the nearby area within an hour.

After reading the GTI "extreme pressure" article that's how I now think of the non-barrier hose, permeation rate equal to expectations unless it is exposed to excessive (350-450 PSI, NOT extreme wherein it would BURST) pressures from time to time.

wwest 06-19-2013 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7507216)
The bottom line Wwest is you are the only one that has to prove something.

And, from what you have written in the forum in the past year I'd say
you don't have the balls.

If I didn't before then after reading YOUR information at GTI I need to go out and buy some "deep rise" pants.

kuehl 06-19-2013 07:09 PM

Lol, like I said, you definitely don't have any balls.
You're such a wussy.

wwest 06-19-2013 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7507156)
No. Wrong. YOUR non barrier hoses leak refrigerant 24/7 and 12 months a year, whether your AC system in on or not. And, the more you use it the more you use it.

CLEVER, but then the new barrier hoses also match that description

That is why barrier hose was developed.

Yes, but because the EPA mandate required a lower R-12 permeation rate.

And we know you can't afford barrier hoses.

Afford..? Or clever enough to discern snake oil marketing techniques when observed.

But, as you said many times, in your climate you really don't drive your old 911 that often and you seldom use your AC system.

That the best you can do..??

Your wife's Lexus does not qualify in the discussion.

That depends on the reference subject matter.

wwest 06-19-2013 07:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kuehl (Post 7507167)
Correct. The TEV in the 911/930 NEVER closes all the way when the compressor is pumping because the low side would pressure would go negative.. into vacuum.

Or..the control system is designed to PREVENT the compressor from pumping when the TXV is closing or has closed.

And, you are Correct, again, the TEV in the 911/930 NEVER closes all the way when compressor is not pumping (system off), that is why the high and low side equalize when you turn the system off.

I'm betting you have never been taught, nor read, anything approaching "The Theory of A/C operation".

This is the nature of this kind of TEV. There are TEV's that do close all the way but you won't find them in MAC (mobile air conditioning) applications.

"..you won't find them in MAC.."

Really, then tell us why not, please..?

SilberUrS6 06-19-2013 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brads911sc (Post 7507182)
The issue wwest is that these are not linear. Right? Adding 35 degrees at the point you mention does not mean pressure will go up enough to have an impact. Lets say you are right for a moment and that it is linear. What would 35 degrees do to the pressure? If 120 degrees equals 250 psi then 155 degrees = 322 psi... But it can't be linear because the tev is going to start opening within the amount of time it took for your temps to rise to that level if it took two minutes. My guess that even it it did rise it would not exceed 300 psi which would not be blowing past orings and fittings. Would it?
It is just not logical for this to be the reason you lose refrigerant. It would need to rise much higher than 155 and much faster than 2 minutes to have a real impact would be my hypothesis.

It's linear, true. But the problem is that PV=nRT uses metric numbers in the calculations. 120F = 322K 155F = 342K Less than 10% increase in temp. And since the pressure is linear with temperature, according to this gas law, there will be less than a 10% increase in pressure, *IF* the volume stays the same. That is, if the TEV is all the way closed. Griff says it never fully closes. Therefore, the moment you turn off the motor, the pressure starts dropping, because the gas is moving back to the low side. Before ANY engine heat can begin warming up the condenser. Sure, the condenser might get warmer from the engine heat, but so what? pressure is dropping on the high side, and rising on the low side.

But thinking that somehow the temp going from, oh, 100F to 200F would cause a doubling of pressure (double the temp, so...) - that just ain't the case. This equation begins the temperature scale at absolute zero. Which doesn't exist anywhere in the universe, as far as we know. The temperature range we are operating in for AC is very small on a gas law scale. Very large temperature increases by human standards (98.4F, body temperature to 212F, boiling point of water) is a very small increase for pressure calculations using the gas law. And since the volume of the system is changing over time (TEV always open), it would take a very large temperature increase to provide ANY pressure increase at all.

The phantom menace of pressure spiking after shutdown is just the vivid imagination of wwest. Or post-purchase justification of his system. Which isn't adequate in sub-tropical or desert conditions anyway.

brads911sc 06-20-2013 05:30 AM

Agree with all your points. Thanks for the education...

Quote:

<div class="pre-quote">
Quote de <strong>brads911sc</strong>
</div>

<div class="post-quote">
<div style="font-style:italic"></div>
</div>It's linear, true. But the problem is that PV=nRT uses metric numbers in the calculations. 120F = 322K 155F = 342K Less than 10% increase in temp. And since the pressure is linear with temperature, according to this gas law, there will be less than a 10% increase in pressure, *IF* the volume stays the same. That is, if the TEV is all the way closed. Griff says it never fully closes. Therefore, the moment you turn off the motor, the pressure starts dropping, because the gas is moving back to the low side. Before ANY engine heat can begin warming up the condenser. Sure, the condenser might get warmer from the engine heat, but so what? pressure is dropping on the high side, and rising on the low side.<br>
<br>
But thinking that somehow the temp going from, oh, 100F to 200F would cause a doubling of pressure (double the temp, so...) - that just ain't the case. This equation begins the temperature scale at absolute zero. Which doesn't exist anywhere in the universe, as far as we know. The temperature range we are operating in for AC is very small on a gas law scale. Very large temperature increases by human standards (98.4F, body temperature to 212F, boiling point of water) is a very small increase for pressure calculations using the gas law. And since the volume of the system is changing over time (TEV always open), it would take a very large temperature increase to provide ANY pressure increase at all.<br>
<br>
The phantom menace of pressure spiking after shutdown is just the vivid imagination of wwest. Or post-purchase justification of his system. Which isn't adequate in sub-tropical or desert conditions anyway.

wwest 06-20-2013 05:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 7507509)
It's linear, true. But the problem is that PV=nRT uses metric numbers in the calculations. 120F = 322K 155F = 342K Less than 10% increase in temp. And since the pressure is linear with temperature, according to this gas law, there will be less than a 10% increase in pressure, *IF* the volume stays the same. That is, if the TEV is all the way closed.

Griff says it never fully closes.

And what Griff says, goes..

In case you haven't noticed, Kuehl just admitted that MOST TXV's are designed to fully close if the conditions require such. As a matter of fact most reliable sources state that if they do not fully close they should be replaced as being defective. Just that those used in cars do not share that same design aspect. Awaiting at the moment as to why that might be.

Anyone know of a reliable information source in that regard..?


Therefore, the moment you turn off the motor, the pressure starts dropping, because the gas is moving back to the low side. Before ANY engine heat can begin warming up the condenser. Sure, the condenser might get warmer from the engine heat, but so what? pressure is dropping on the high side, and rising on the low side.

But thinking that somehow the temp going from, oh, 100F to 200F would cause a doubling of pressure (double the temp, so...) - that just ain't the case. This equation begins the temperature scale at absolute zero. Which doesn't exist anywhere in the universe, as far as we know. The temperature range we are operating in for AC is very small on a gas law scale. Very large temperature increases by human standards (98.4F, body temperature to 212F, boiling point of water) is a very small increase for pressure calculations using the gas law. And since the volume of the system is changing over time (TEV always open), it would take a very large temperature increase to provide ANY pressure increase at all.

The phantom menace of pressure spiking after shutdown is just the vivid imagination of wwest. Or post-purchase justification of his system. Which isn't adequate in sub-tropical or desert conditions anyway.


"..The phantom menace.."

So now you're disbelieving Kuehl's "bible", hoses are intentionally "porus" to provide a "slow" leak under pressure rather than let that pressure build up to "extreme".

SilberUrS6 06-20-2013 06:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brads911sc (Post 7507799)
Agree with all your points. Thanks for the education...

Well, wwest wanted to promote a theory. Really, in scientific terms, a hypothesis. Well, in science, a physical law is always the trump card. And the gas law is indeed a law, just like the law of gravity.

I figured I'd let him get about three months into his hypothesis before I whipped out a little ol' physical chemistry. Mind you, it's been a while (ahem) since p-chem, but I still have vivid nightmares. It was the hardest class I ever took. The math just about kicked my @$$ to the chemistry-major curb. Funny now, I look back on it and am surprised by how much of it I remember. I hardly ever use any of the stuff p-chem taught, but I still remember describing the behavior of a van der Waals gas in a closed system...

I was thinking earlier about the purported 800psi high side. Well, let's come out of Stupidland (800psi is a ridiculous number, obviously a troll) and enter Fantasyland. Let's say, oh, 420psi. I pick that number because wwest is high if he thinks the pressure climbs that far without the compressor running and something wrong with the system.

If the normal operating pressure is 250 psi high side, AND IF the TEV closes all the way, then what you have is 68% increase in pressure. If R12 is an ideal gas, then by PV=nRT (volume, mass of refrigerant and gas constant all being constant) and we start with a temperature of 120F (322K), then the temperature *of the system* (not just the condenser) would need to be 393F (473.7K). Nearly 400 degrees Fahrenheit. Hoses, fittings, everything. Since the hoses, fitting and everything not near the engine are going to be cooler, you'd actually need even higher temps to produce that kind of after-run pressure.

Maybe in wwest's cars, there is some sort of fault in the system, and he's getting TEV blockage at shutdown. And maybe the pressure spikes. But the idea that it's even going to 400psi from waste heat in the engine compartment is not merely ridiculous.

It's impossible.

And here's the kicker - the ideal gas law, where the gas is described as a constant, rather than as some form of equation (eg. van der Waals gas) is true for most gases at or near standard temperatures and pressures. When stuff gets freaky, like very low temps nearer to absolute zero, or very high temps near where a gas becomes plasma, or super-high pressures (1000x the air pressure at sea level), that where real gases stop behaving like ideal gases. But at the temperatures and pressures we're talking here? Even a big molecule like R12 exhibits mostly ideal gas behavior.

If wwest want to proffer any more of his wild-eyed hypotheses, just aim him at this post. Have him go ahead and argue with a scientific law that was established before he was born.

wwest 06-20-2013 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SilberUrS6 (Post 7507866)
Well, wwest wanted to promote a theory. Really, in scientific terms, a hypothesis. Well, in science, a physical law is always the trump card. And the gas law is indeed a law, just like the law of gravity.

I figured I'd let him get about three months into his hypothesis before I whipped out a little ol' physical chemistry. Mind you, it's been a while (ahem) since p-chem, but I still have vivid nightmares. It was the hardest class I ever took. The math just about kicked my @$$ to the chemistry-major curb. Funny now, I look back on it and am surprised by how much of it I remember. I hardly ever use any of the stuff p-chem taught, but I still remember describing the behavior of a van der Waals gas in a closed system...

I was thinking earlier about the purported 800psi high side. Well, let's come out of Stupidland (800psi is a ridiculous number, obviously a troll) and enter Fantasyland. Let's say, oh, 420psi. I pick that number because wwest is high if he thinks the pressure climbs that far without the compressor running and something wrong with the system.

If the normal operating pressure is 250 psi high side, AND IF the TEV closes all the way, then what you have is 68% increase in pressure. If R12 is an ideal gas, then by PV=nRT (volume, mass of refrigerant and gas constant all being constant) and we start with a temperature of 120F (322K), then the temperature *of the system* (not just the condenser) would need to be 393F (473.7K). Nearly 400 degrees Fahrenheit. Hoses, fittings, everything. Since the hoses, fitting and everything not near the engine are going to be cooler, you'd actually need even higher temps to produce that kind of after-run pressure.

Maybe in wwest's cars, there is some sort of fault in the system, and he's getting TEV blockage at shutdown. And maybe the pressure spikes. But the idea that it's even going to 400psi from waste heat in the engine compartment is not merely ridiculous.

It's impossible.

And here's the kicker - the ideal gas law, where the gas is described as a constant, rather than as some form of equation (eg. van der Waals gas) is true for most gases at or near standard temperatures and pressures. When stuff gets freaky, like very low temps nearer to absolute zero, or very high temps near where a gas becomes plasma, or super-high pressures (1000x the air pressure at sea level), that where real gases stop behaving like ideal gases. But at the temperatures and pressures we're talking here? Even a big molecule like R12 exhibits mostly ideal gas behavior.

If wwest want to proffer any more of his wild-eyed hypotheses, just aim him at this post. Have him go ahead and argue with a scientific law that was established before he was born.

Then why do we still have 350-450 PSI BOV's in the marketplace...

Are you by chance forgetting, or intentionally over-looking, the fact that a "state change", liquid to gas, gas to liquid, is involved here.??

Don't we all know that heating a sealed container fill with water will eventually result the pressure inside the container rising and rising until the container bursts...?

brads911sc 06-20-2013 07:39 AM

he is just so simple minded. we are now boiling water in a container. he is 73. came from a much simplier time when things didnt require a high level of technical knowledge or understanding. He grew up with Swamp coolers. Combined with an education obtained on Google... i can see where he would constantly confuse himself and change his theories. which is what has happened over time. Afterall if its on the internet it must be true. Sounds like something my grandmother would say.... think its a generational thing... someone needs to just put the old dog out of his misery..

wwest 06-20-2013 07:43 AM

Worth reading...

Automotive Air Conditioning Bulletin Board &bull; View topic - What is SUPERHEAT??

brads911sc 06-20-2013 08:00 AM

Why are you posting articles on residential AC on a Porsche 911 Tech site. wow. Your lack of knowledge is so apparent when you are posting unrelated material. There was another guy who did this.. oh yes. Reid...



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website


DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.