| Ronnie's.930 |
04-11-2015 02:08 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by tirwin
(Post 8571903)
Dave,
Here is the problem I see with Reid's approach . . .
So, we're left with a target market for Reid's idea of people that fall in option 3 -- the complete DIYer that has complete faith and confidence in their knowledge and abilities AND the time and cash to burn if the idea doesn't pan out. And where would you go for assistance? Reid?
Most people that I think fall into option 3 seem to be panning Reid's idea. Why do you suppose that is? Most people do a risk/benefit analysis when making a decision. It seems the jury is saying they fail to see a SUPERIOR benefit as Reid claims. What people seem to believe is that it is a push. The burden of proof is on Reid because it's his claim. If he was a bit more humble I don't think he would get the pushback he gets, but that is a different discussion. . . .
|
Excellent post, Tim (all of if, not just the snippet I quoted here), that nicely explains why Reid gets "dogged" (as he calls it) so much in these threads - really enjoyed reading it.
As I've said many times previously (speaking of "many times", notice how Reid is again "open looping" his previous posts *Bob's outstanding description of Reid's practice* - too funny, in a "point-n-laugh" sort of way), Reid has yet to demonstrate a/c performance that is superior to what is obtainable with "obsolete" technology, so all of his much repeated, "FULL CAPS" chest beating is nothing more than self-parody at this point.
|
