Saddam's WMD

[fintstone]

Originally posted by fastpat
As someone who studied NBC with a nationally known epidemiologist, I can categorically state that you should then be relieved. You've just revealed that you are a politically motivated know nothing.

Joining a Doctor for a cup of coffee of cleaning up after him is not exactly the same as "studying with him."

Clearly if he is an Epidemiologist...he would only study the smallest third of WMD, the bio piece...not the Chem or Nuclear.

I have to agree with Nat's dad...your military experiences sure seem strange compared to mine. Could the Army or the Nat'l Guard just be that far behind?

[Moneyguy1]

Naah...

You just have to accept your role as an ubermensch!!!!

[fastpat]

Originally posted by fintstone
Joining a Doctor for a cup of coffee of cleaning up after him is not exactly the same as "studying with him."

Clearly if he is an Epidemiologist...he would only study the smallest third of WMD, the bio piece...not the Chem or Nuclear.

I have to agree with Nat's dad...your military experiences sure seem strange compared to mine. Could the Army or the Nat'l Guard just be that far behind?

I "studied NBC" with him because he commanded one unit and I commanded another. We used his special knowledge, which the guys at Fort Detrick do as well, to gain quite a high level of training.

Get a grip.

[john70t]

quote:" I have to agree with Nat's dad...your military experiences sure seem strange compared to mine. Could the Army or the Nat'l Guard just be that far behind?"
-A good question for your draft-dodger Cheney, or deserter Bush.

Those repetative motivations for invasion of Iraq seem to splinter into little tiny shards when a current comparison is suggested.
The RNH "commity to re-elect for life" suppression team must be in full swing tonight. Good thing you have lots of money.

[Moneyguy1]

Kinda makes you wonder when a new amendment will be proposed to eliminate the two term limit.....

[fastpat]

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
Kinda makes you wonder when a new amendment will be proposed to eliminate the two term limit.....

Right behind the anti-flag burning amendment just passed in the house, and just before the anti-gay marriage amendment proposal? There was talk of repealing the presidential term limit during Reagan's second term, and he was already having trouble wiping his own ass.

Remember right after Arnold was elected in CA, all the talk of amending the Constitution so foreign born can become president?

Like most laws today, it's all about power and control of people with money as the grease.

[914GT]

Originally posted by fastpat
and he was already having trouble wiping his own ass.

From your personal observations or another Lew Rockwell factoid?

[Nathans_Dad]

Paste how did I know you were going to say that you were an expert on WMD?? Your breadth of knowledge is truly amazing...

You are an expert in medicine, history, government, Porsches, marxism, fascism, pseuso-revisionist history, weapons, women, military tactics, the lifetime writings of Lew Rockwell, government, libertarianism and now WMD.

And to think you still somehow fit in time to dress up in your GI Joe wannabe outfit and your Jihadist wannabe outfit.

You truly are a great man. Either that or so full of shyt you have to blow your nose to take a dump. One or the other...

[fastpat]

Originally posted by Nathans_Dad
Paste how did I know you were going to say that you were an expert on WMD?? Your breadth of knowledge is truly amazing...

You are an expert in medicine, history, government, Porsches, marxism, fascism, pseuso-revisionist history, weapons, women, military tactics, the lifetime writings of Lew Rockwell, government, libertarianism and now WMD.

And to think you still somehow fit in time to dress up in your GI Joe wannabe outfit and your Jihadist wannabe outfit.

You truly are a great man. Either that or so full of shyt you have to blow your nose to take a dump. One or the other...

And you thought all the over-achievers went to med school, tsk-tsk.

[fintstone]

Originally posted by fastpat
I "studied NBC" with him because he commanded one unit and I commanded another. We used his special knowledge, which the guys at Fort Detrick do as well, to gain quite a high level of training.

Get a grip.

That doesn't make sense to me...I could see it if you were working in a field decon unit or hosptal. Maybe it is an unusual Army thing. What type unit would you command to study epidemiology? Most Guard and Reserve units I have worked with have had little time for anything other than mandatory training...and their commanders had even less. They were busy commanding.

[fintstone]

Originally posted by john70t
quote:" I have to agree with Nat's dad...your military experiences sure seem strange compared to mine. Could the Army or the Nat'l Guard just be that far behind?"
-A good question for your draft-dodger Cheney, or deserter Bush.

Those repetative motivations for invasion of Iraq seem to splinter into little tiny shards when a current comparison is suggested.
The RNH "commity to re-elect for life" suppression team must be in full swing tonight. Good thing you have lots of money.

Huh?

[fintstone]

Originally posted by Moneyguy1
Kinda makes you wonder when a new amendment will be proposed to eliminate the two term limit.....

No, that was Clinton supporters. There are plenty of Bush brothers to last for far into the future. By then, the twins will be ready to run....or....

[stuartj]

Originally posted by Nathans_Dad
Paste how did I know you were going to say that you were an expert on WMD?? Your breadth of knowledge is truly amazing...

Well I'm not an expert on WMD like you warrior military types.

Just show me the credible and immediate threat presented by Saddam's weapons program, and I'll get on board. Really. (Although one wonders -could it possibly be as dangerous to the world as the US's weapons fetish?)

Show me the weapons, the infrastructure, the delivery platforms that constitute a clear and present danger to the West or the US, or Iraq's neighbours.

With 200,000 troops in situ, unfettered access and $$millions of reward money on offer for evidence, surely it cant be that difficult.

Unless the WMD capability simply doesn't exist. What a bummer.

[fintstone]

Originally posted by stuartj
...Just show me the credible and immediate threat presented by Saddam's weapons program, and I'll get on board. Really. (Although one wonders -could it possibly be as dangerous to the world as the US's weapons fetish?)
...

I think 500 warhead were a credible and imminent threat to people in the region.

Originally posted by stuartj
...Show me the weapons, the infrastructure, the delivery platforms that constitute a clear and present danger to the West or the US, or Iraq's neighbours. ...

Too late; we destroyed the infrastructure and the delivery platforms.

[john70t]

draft-dodger Cheney (like Clinton, it was common back then for ivy-leaguers to escape service by patrolling the Miami shores in the NG),

or deserter Bush AWOL is desertion. Isn't it.

[lowbob84]

No. AWOL (absent without leave) is a totally separate UCMJ offense. Desertion carries a caveat of the intention of not returning to service.

[stuartj]

Originally posted by fintstone
I think 500 warhead were a credible and imminent threat to people in the region.



Too late; we destroyed the infrastructure and the delivery platforms.

Blew it all into tiny iddle unrecognisable, unphotographable, uninspectable bits eh? And all those pre war inspection teams failed to take a single picture. Doh.

The amount of depleted urnanium that the US military has flung around Iraq presents as much a long term danger to the locals than 500, or 5000 obselete chem shells.

The biggest threat these tactical artillery shells shells represent is that insurgenst will use them in IEDs, a threat that has emerged only since the COTW statred a war. Ironic as.

You think "500 warhead were a credible and imminent threat to people in the region."

Enough to go to war over, eh? 2500 American lives, 19,000 caulaities, god knows how many Iraqis dead and wounded, civil war. I wonder would the electorate have agreed with you.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by john70t
draft-dodger Cheney (like Clinton, it was common back then for ivy-leaguers to escape service by patrolling the Miami shores in the NG),

or deserter Bush AWOL is desertion. Isn't it.

Interesting how the liberals, notoriously anti-military, pretend to speak for the military and are some types of experts. The Democrats have been an enemy of the military for years. The Democrats hate the military and the military hates the Democrats.

On the other hand, all BS aside...The military loves Rumsfeld/Cheney and GW Bush.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by lowbob84
No. AWOL (absent without leave) is a totally separate UCMJ offense. Desertion carries a caveat of the intention of not returning to service.

I am not up on military law. What is it called when an active duty military personnel meets with the enemy and recites their propaganda on the national stage?...Think John Kerry.

I am pretty sure it is called treason.

[Mulhollanddose]

Originally posted by stuartj
Show me the weapons, the infrastructure, the delivery platforms that constitute a clear and present danger to the West or the US, or Iraq's neighbours.

Clinton indictment of Osama:

"Additionally, the indictment states that Al Qaeda reached an agreement with Iraq not to work against the regime of Saddam Hussein and that they would work cooperatively with Iraq, particularly in weapons development."

Saddam had a megolomaniac's desire to self-destruct. He did not care if it meant he being toppled. The evidence of his recklessness is the fact that he is on trial as we speak. What makes anybody believe that Saddam wouldn't have loved to get chemical or biological weapons into the hands of Osama?...Osama had a pretty good record of delivering on his promises.





See my signature line.