 
					|   | 
 | 
 | 
| 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Houston 
					Posts: 567
				 | 
			Here are a few more pictures of the linkage parts off the car      And installed:    | ||
|  08-28-2018, 05:13 AM | 
 | 
| scumbag | 
			great right-up, Clay.  really spells it out clearly! Thanks! 
				__________________ My first Porsche - http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsche-911-technical-forum/989493-my-low-budget-dream-car-build.html AchtungKraft #009 - IG: @doktor_b | ||
|  08-28-2018, 05:16 AM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			I should maybe also clarify: As far as I know, this kit is by far the simplest, easiest and cheapest way to go ITB. It works well, with only very minor issues, that can be sorted out with a little fiddling. Clay's support has been very good and this thread has helped me many times (big thanks to Al as well!)  In fact, I just did a 1200 mile road trip to the Belgian F1 at Spa with no issues at all (I need to change to TPS though). I have recommended this kit to my local Porsche nerds as a cheap DIY approach alternative to the factory kits. I'm a very happy chap indeed. Cheers from Denmark On the road somewhere in Germany:    | ||
|  08-28-2018, 06:49 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta 
					Posts: 1,241
				 | Quote: 
 
				__________________ No physical quantity completely explains its own existence | ||
|  08-28-2018, 07:44 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: mt. vernon Wa. USA 
					Posts: 8,736
				 | 
			Clay, Excellent explanation for setting up the linkage and balancing the ITBs. These are essential steps towards a great running engine. Also, a good explanation of the Price/Performance/Features aspect of bringing a product like this to market. There are plenty of "Cost no Object" systems out there and I offer those too, but the original intent of the Speed Triple system was/is to provide a high performing system that is relatively affordable for the DIY crowd (I made my first system for myself). Your products are in alignment with that intent. Good work.... regards, al 
				__________________ [B]Current projects: 69-911.5, Previous:73 911X (off to SanFrancisco/racing in Germany).77 911S (NY), 71E (France/Corsica), 66-912 ( France), 1970 914X (Wisconsin) 76 911S roller..off to Florida/Germany RGruppe #669 http://www.x-faktory.com/ | ||
|  08-28-2018, 07:49 AM | 
 | 
| Registered User Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: SoCal 
					Posts: 642
				 | 
			
+5 Clay is really good people
		 
				__________________ 2007 GT3 1982 911SC 1998 Integra Type R | ||
|  08-28-2018, 02:32 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Houston 
					Posts: 567
				 | 
			Thanks guys.
		 | ||
|  09-19-2018, 05:03 PM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			but still no dyno? Love all of it regardless 
				__________________ Simon -1966 Lotus Elan FHC 'the project' -1986 German Car TBD ' the ...?...' -2006 Jetta TDI 'the daily' | ||
|  10-29-2018, 02:19 PM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Sep 1999 
					Posts: 944
				 | 
				
				Dyno Run Please
			 
			Let's see some numbers from these EFI conversions.  For horsepower, carb conversions aren't entirely dead.   Jeff Gamroth/Rothsport: 3.0 liter: Single plug, 911SC cams, 46IDA Webers: 252HP @6500 RPM 
				__________________ R Gruppe #111 Early S Registry #235 res ipsa loquitur | ||
|  10-30-2018, 04:06 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta 
					Posts: 1,241
				 | 
			Didn't Dzug dyno his single plug 2.7 a while back?  Made something like 220 at the wheels IIRC?  Al knows.
		 
				__________________ No physical quantity completely explains its own existence | ||
|  10-30-2018, 05:08 AM | 
 | 
| New-ish 911SC Targa Owner | 
			I put down 182whp with '83 US spec small-port heads and factory SC cams and a sport muffler.  I have a sneaking suspicion that porting the intake mani's and the a port job on the cylinder heads would really help out with mid and top end.  I added BBE headers since i dyno'ed and felt a nice improvement from 4.5k-7k. But I haven't been back on the rolling road since. The changes to midrange and light throttle were where I really thought the triumph ITBs and EFI changed the car. Oh, and the reliability and dependability. I literally haven't had to mess with anything be in the system besides the tune. If i did it all over again I'd have gone ported heads and big cam and 8,000rpm capable items. 
				__________________ '83 Targa 300k w/ freshened 3.0 with 930/52 case# 6770540 ARP and Raceware hardware - AEM Infinity 506, Triumph T595 ITBs, B&B headers, Dynomax muff, Fidanza FW, Alum PP-203whp | ||
|  10-30-2018, 05:09 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta 
					Posts: 1,241
				 | Quote: 
 
				__________________ No physical quantity completely explains its own existence | ||
|  10-30-2018, 05:13 AM | 
 | 
|   | 
| New-ish 911SC Targa Owner | 
			a dynojet.  Not sure of the exact model.   The '83 was just the under performer of the 3.0's from what I've seen from other folks' dyno charts. I'd love to get back and dyno again with the headers to see what they may have freed up. 
				__________________ '83 Targa 300k w/ freshened 3.0 with 930/52 case# 6770540 ARP and Raceware hardware - AEM Infinity 506, Triumph T595 ITBs, B&B headers, Dynomax muff, Fidanza FW, Alum PP-203whp | ||
|  10-30-2018, 05:58 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta 
					Posts: 1,241
				 | 
			Thanks.  Mid to low 180s is what a healthy 2.7MFI motor pulls on a dynojet, and that motor is horribly underrated by the factory at a quoted 210, when anyone I've ever spoken to states they are consistently 220-225 at the flywheel, stock.  I haven't strapped my 2.8 to a dyno yet as it's not quite ready, but with these cams it really needed to be tuned by alpha-N i.e. TPS only. MUCH better response and controllability. I'm liking using a type K voltage-based cylinder head temp sensor as well. Wiring it up with a 0-5v analogue booster for AEM brain was a bit of a pain to hide but the response time is super quick. 
				__________________ No physical quantity completely explains its own existence Last edited by lvporschepilot; 10-30-2018 at 06:46 AM.. | ||
|  10-30-2018, 06:42 AM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			if you have the plot, post them! Im always curious what the curves look like
		 
				__________________ Simon -1966 Lotus Elan FHC 'the project' -1986 German Car TBD ' the ...?...' -2006 Jetta TDI 'the daily' | ||
|  10-30-2018, 07:20 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Sep 1999 
					Posts: 944
				 | Quote: 
   
				__________________ R Gruppe #111 Early S Registry #235 res ipsa loquitur | ||
|  10-30-2018, 07:32 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Northside, Brooklyn 
					Posts: 2,358
				 | 
			A "know-nothing" here... So how are the '76-'79 3.0 engine's precicely different from the '83 engine?   Bigger ports? Triumph -Speed-Triple x2 ITB's seems like a legit upgrade ... 
				__________________ jt '83 SC '96 M3 6 Bicycles 2 Sailboats | ||
|  10-30-2018, 08:27 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Atlanta 
					Posts: 1,241
				 | Quote: 
 Correcto. Earlier years have 39mm ports. Later are a good bit smaller, but with the stock CIS system there really is no difference in power. However, when a system that can really breath is installed (ITBs), the port size issue is clearly articulated. 
				__________________ No physical quantity completely explains its own existence | ||
|  10-30-2018, 09:12 AM | 
 | 
| Registered | 
			I thought 74-77 were 2.7, and then 78+ were 3.0
		 
				__________________ Simon -1966 Lotus Elan FHC 'the project' -1986 German Car TBD ' the ...?...' -2006 Jetta TDI 'the daily' | ||
|  10-30-2018, 09:18 AM | 
 | 
| Registered Join Date: Sep 1999 
					Posts: 944
				 | 
			
'76-'77 Carrera 3.0 was never sold here new.  Precursor of the 3.0SC.  Big intake port engine. CIS runners were larger as well. 
				__________________ R Gruppe #111 Early S Registry #235 res ipsa loquitur | ||
|  10-30-2018, 09:43 AM | 
 |