|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2018
Posts: 73
|
also looking for a 964 and trying to understand the values, they are all over the place. The "2 sisters" one i was informed by a member on pelican that the owner wants $90,000 for it, i think he is quite the dreamer.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Still here
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
I've looked at and driven SC's, G50 3.2's, 993's, and 964's. I like the 964 the best and to me, it's the perfect mix between old & new. By far my favorite. Last edited by Dtronics; 06-16-2018 at 07:03 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
That’s kind of funny to hear considering he gave the vibe of willing to make a deal if you buy both my cars from me. On a side note my friend sold 5 clean, slick top, C2’s to a single buyer for $500k
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: On The Road
Posts: 2,285
|
Quote:
I don't get the money that the 964 gets. I just do not. It's a test bed of things that Porsche needed and had to do for EPA and DOT. They had no money to fix the problems. They had no money to actually hone the car to where it could have been. It's a crapshoot really. As I have said to most people, when I toured the factory in '93 when they were rolling off the line the workers looked completely depressed and sullen. All they had were old refined waterpumpers - a 928, 968, and the aircooled patched up 964. To each is own, but I would take a late '80s G-body any single day over a 964. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 336
|
any bites yet?
to me personally, the 993 is the ultimate air cooled Porsche. Last and most refined, great cruiser and a fantastic driving machine if it needs to be. Agree with SalParadise that the 964 was only because they 'had to' |
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,393
|
Hey you buy a 964 yet? from 2018, prices have gone up
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Agreed! 964 is a heavy boat with a long stroke. I wouldn't own one, and sad to say I did and drove it for a year in 1998? Then again, if it were a 964 Turbo, I'd be all over it.
__________________
911heaven |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Old thread but I am surprised to hear you say that. I have both turbo and C2 and owned many earlier cars. Other than my 3.0RS tribute and maybe my 911E I never found the earlier cars worth much. Agreed in stock form the 964 is lacking but with some mods and suspension work IMO it is the best air-cooled made by Porsche. You couldn't get me back in an earlier 911 again. Just don't have the build and tub strength of a 964.
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
I own two G body 911s. So to be clear I’m not partial to 964 per say because I don’t even own one. But logic tells me there is a reason Singer uses 964 as donor cars....
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,488
|
Go to rennlist.com and to the 964 board, add a little more info about the car you will get much better opinions than some of those above.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Also remember that 964's were the aircooled equivalent of the 996's current valuation and could be picked up cheap for years. That, combined with a newer and stronger tub compared to the G body makes it an easy choice
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
My understanding was it had a lot to do with cost of the donors. At the time 964s were very cheap. The first two singers were g-body, g50s.
|
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
__________________
911heaven Last edited by 911heaven; 12-20-2020 at 04:03 AM.. |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Air-cooled experience is a personal thing and they are all good. I agree it took some time to get used to the weight going from a 2390 pound 275HP 911 to a 360 hp 3120 pound 964 turbo. Very different and initially I wasn't impressed with the 964 until I had a chance to get to know them better. With 15k track miles in a c2 under my belt I have learned to appreciate them a bit more. Each has its pros and cons. I prefer the modern eq and suspension of the later cars but for me the 993 goes too far and looses some of the analog feel of the trailing arm cars.
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
In 1999 bought a 993 with 20k Km) hit dead center front street pole. At a million yen I decided to part it out because no title. Sent that complete rear assembly in a container to Chicago that was full of wrecked Lancer EVOs. My customer shipped it free to CA (friend's house). My friend David only got an offer of $1200. It was late model then so I said no way! A few years later his o'l lady got sick of it in the garage, so on a trip home I took it up to my o'l man's place in No. NV. Years later he got sick of it in his garage so I stuffed it in a crate going back to Japan with a wood splitter or a porsche motor or something. A couple years ago I sold it here on auction for $1500. The buyer was tickled pink! It didn't cost a dime to ship and any point in it's journey. Funny what one will do to get full value. I think over 20 years it went from late model to more desirable, or something like that. Had the internet been around then like it is now, I wouldn't have gone through the exercise. Still, it cost me nothing.
__________________
911heaven |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,488
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Quote:
![]() Happy Holidays everyone.
__________________
Anthony PCA affiliate '77 member '83 '90 3.8 RS tribute, 91 C4 converted to C2,'93 964 C2, '93 928 GTS M '94 Turbo 3.6, '15 Boxster GTS M,16 GT4,23 Macan GTS, Gone worth mentioning '71 E '79 SC, '79 built to '74 3.0 RS tribute (2390 # 270 hp), '80 928 euro 5 speed, '74 2.0l 914, '89 944 S2,'04 Cayenne TT '14 boxster, '14 Cayenne GTS 14 Cayman S, 18 Macan GTS many others |
||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
|||
|
|
|
|
Registered
|
Interesting to me is on donor cars Singer vs RUF. Ruf had their WO9 allotment tubs, thereafter they did full engine conversions on donor cars I believe WOP? Either company might consider cost to sales value on their product. Therefore, any donor car is irrelevant per year or grade, as long as it doesn't cost them anything. After all, when they be done with it, it's going to be a Singer or a RUF.
Ruf came first before Singer. I think that is what Ruf did. There were all kinds of Rufs. The one I got is an 89' ROW carrera cab. and became a BTR III.
__________________
911heaven |
||
|
|
|