Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog Tech Info Tech Forums
 
  Search our site:    
 Cart  | Project List | Order Status | Help    



Go Back   Pelican Parts Technical BBS > 1- Porsche Technical Forums > 911 / 930 Turbo & Super Charging Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
Author
Thread Post New Thread    Reply
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belmont, Ca.
Posts: 781
Send a message via Yahoo to Larry_Ratcliff
engine selection would it be better to get a 3.2 or a 3.6

I have been giving a lot of thought to the converting of my car to a turbo. At first I was thinking that just getting a 3.2 carrera engine and turbo charging that but now I am starting to think that getting a 3.6 964 engine to start with would be a better place to start.

My goal is to have an engine that has plenty of power outside of the boost to make it easy to drive on the street. I was also thinking that the 964 engine is already twin plugged so really if you look at the price difference between the two engines the cost of twin plugging a 3.2 would bring them to about the same initial cost.

The 964 intake looks almost identical to the 3.2 carrera ... and I am thinking the added displacement is a very nice bonus.

The one thing that I thought might be a problem is finding the correct size turbo for a single turbo 3.6 application. It seems that most 3.6 applications were all twin turbo ... with the exception of 1 year (I could be wrong on this point).

To narrow my question I guess I would really like to know advantages or disadvantages of starting with a 3.6 vs a 3.2. I would also like to know of available turbos for the 3.6 vs the 3.2.
Lastly, I am guessing that if a single turbo set up for the 3.6 is limited that the twin turbo would add an order of magnitude to the cost to the turbo set up. In other words would it make more sense to just buy a stock 3.6 TT engine vs trying to turbo charge a N.A. 3.6.

The method behind my madness is that it seems that most people that buy stock turbo engines end up changing the exhaust, turbo, fuel injection etc... and the premium that has to be paid for the turbo engine is pretty high so I am trying to get the words of wisdom from the people who have already been down this road.

thanks in advance for your responses.
Larry Ratcliff
Old 02-04-2007, 11:50 AM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #1 (permalink)
Registered User
 
WydRyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
Yup, BTDT and would never turn back

I vote for the 3.6 as a better platform... easier to extract more HP at less boost. It also has the nice twin plugged heads/ignition already there. No need to spend a few $K getting that done on the 3.2

You can single turbo the 3.6... it just takes a bit more clever routing of the charge air pipe around the twin dizzy to make it work, but it's not impossible. Just use a good fabricator to make you the pipe

It'd be much cheaper than a twin setup that's for sure.

Depending on how much boost and power you want to make, you will be able to match a turbo to your application. If you are after sub-600H power levels, the GT35R is an awesome turbo and on that 3.6, it will spool freakishly fast Of course you have other options, like KKK, PTE, Turbonetics etc...

3.6 pistons have a lot of meat on the piston crown... have them machined down for a lower C/R and boost away
__________________
Merv
'89 911 Turbo Cab
Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition
Old 02-04-2007, 01:44 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #2 (permalink)
A fellow Pelacanite
 
NathanUK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,002
Garage
3.6 !

Get the rod bolts upgraded to raceware or ARP though if you are going over 400bhp at the crank.
__________________
1981 UK 930. G50/01 shortened, 964 3.8RS Fibreglass Body Kit, 18" Alloys 8.5" F & 10" R, 225's F & 285's R, Special Colour Metallic Blue Paint, FIA Sparco Evo's, A/C and Air Pump removed, Electronic Boost Controller, GHL Headers, Tial46 WG.
Fitting - New service kit.
Needs Fitting - Innovate XD-16 Kit, Kokeln IC. Stephen's K27 HFS, EVO Intake Assy & his Modded USA Fuel Head.

1983 UK 911 3.2 Carrera Sport Coupe. Black, Black Leather with Red Piping, Black Alloy Gear Knob, K&N Air Filter Element, Turbo Tie rods.
Needs Fitting - K&N CO Sensor, Round A/F Dial Gauge, Factory Short Shift Kit.

http://www.danasoft.com/sig/Iamnotanumber.jpg
Old 02-04-2007, 02:43 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #3 (permalink)
Registered User
 
WydRyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
No argument from me... DEFINITELY get ARP fasteners!

Depending on how much boost you want to run, whilst you're in there, you might want to consider Nerosisting the heads/liners for best sealing over 1.2bar of boost

PM me if you want more info.
__________________
Merv
'89 911 Turbo Cab
Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition
Old 02-04-2007, 02:50 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #4 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belmont, Ca.
Posts: 781
Send a message via Yahoo to Larry_Ratcliff
I noticed that powerhaus has a conversion for the 3.6. Has anyone used them. I have seen a few cars with powerhaus intercoolers. I just did not know if it would be worthwhile to buy a complete turbo conversion kit.
Old 02-04-2007, 07:24 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #5 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belmont, Ca.
Posts: 781
Send a message via Yahoo to Larry_Ratcliff
Would it be worth it to buy pauter or carillo rods or are the 3.6 rods good enough with the arp fasteners?
Old 02-04-2007, 07:26 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #6 (permalink)
Registered User
 
WydRyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
If you are raising the rev limit way beyond the factory setting, then yes, it's worth upgrading your rods too, but the 930 rods have proven to hold up very well to big HP application with good quality ARP fasteners. Just don't go missing gear shifts too often and over-revving
__________________
Merv
'89 911 Turbo Cab
Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition
Old 02-04-2007, 07:39 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #7 (permalink)
Lurkasaurus
 
turbocarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 930
I would love a 3.6 - so easy to get a 3.8 or 3.9!
__________________
Tony '77 930
"Objects in mirror are losing"
"Oh cock..." - James May
Old 02-04-2007, 08:14 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #8 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belmont, Ca.
Posts: 781
Send a message via Yahoo to Larry_Ratcliff
Ok I am getting fairly sold on the idea of using a 3.6. I am even considering using the 3.6 that is already in my car now. The engine that is in my car is a 3.6 out of a 96 993 but has the 95 plastic intake. Can the plastic intake be boosted?

At first I was going to build a turbo engine for the 74 then put this engine in my 67. However, based on the research I have been doing I can see that this is not going to be a nominal endeavour financially so I am thinking to sell my 67 to pay for it.

Due to the level of rebuilding that is going to have to take place I still be better off to sell my 23K mile engine with the SSI's and sport muffler that is all set up for an early car installation and buy the 964 engine. I am just thinking that I could pick up a 964 engine for around 5500 - 6K where as I gave 12K for the 993 engine + a boat load for the SSI's for a 3.6 + almost a grand for the muffler

On the other hand the 96 engine has the big ports etc... I could buy a set of 3.8 turbo P&C, carillo rods and boost away if the plastic intake will take it.
Old 02-04-2007, 08:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #9 (permalink)
Registered User
 
WydRyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
The 993 engine has smaller exhaust ports I believe.

Also, the 993 pistons cannot be machined down.. only the 964 pistons can be, to achieve ~8.25:1 C/R.

My vote? Get the 964 motor

It only costs $20-$25 per piston to have shaved. They should also be balanced after the dome is trimmed &
Valve pockets would probaby be an extra $90-$100
__________________
Merv
'89 911 Turbo Cab
Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition

Last edited by WydRyd; 02-04-2007 at 08:53 PM..
Old 02-04-2007, 08:50 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #10 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Jeff Alton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Langley,B.C.
Posts: 9,763
3.2 and 964 rods are the same and both use the smaller rod bolt. Like others have said, ARP is cheap insurance if you are in there already.

Cheers
__________________
Turn3 Autosport- Full Service and Race Prep
jeff@turn3autosport.com
996 Turbo, 997 S 4.0, Cayman S 3.8, Boxster 2.7, Boxster S race car, 996. Cayenne TT
Old 02-04-2007, 09:25 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #11 (permalink)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belmont, Ca.
Posts: 781
Send a message via Yahoo to Larry_Ratcliff
WydRyd the port sizes on the 964 engine is 41.5 int 38 exhaust. Valve size was 49, 42.5. The 96 engine I have has 43 int 39 exhaust 50 int 43.5 exhaust. The big reason for this is b/c in 96 the engine had a varioram intake on it thus they could run bigger valves and ports. The reason my car has a 95 plastic intake on it is because it was initially slated for a 914 installation but I bought it when the other guy had a change of heart.

However, your point of the savings on pistons is well noted. Machine work on 6 pistons vs buying a whole new set would be a ~1K savings.

Since I am new to boost from any source I was wondering how much of an advantage the larger ports and valve sizes would be. For that matter would a varioram intake make a good turbo intake?

I know that I am throwing out a lot of questions at this point it is just so I dont wind up wishing I would have done it differently when it is all said and done.

Thanks for your responses,
Larry Ratcliff
Old 02-04-2007, 09:30 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #12 (permalink)
 
Now Available for Ordering:   101 Projects For Your BMW 3 Series 1982-2000  [more info]
Registered User
 
89turbocabmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,253
Larry, I'm currently building a 3.6 single turbo. There are lots of options depending on how much power you want. Stronger rod bolts are a must. I have been advised by a few builders to avoid boosting the stock 964 crank, but I think that if you build a mild motor you might be fine. The best options are using a 3.2/3.3 crank for 3.5L, or the GT3R watercooled crank which is fully counter-weighted and cross-drilled. I'm going with a new GT3R myself as the net cost after selling my 964 crank will be less than $700. There are lots of great turbos out there, so that shouldn't be a problem. Selling a car should cover most of your build expense

Last edited by 89turbocabmike; 02-04-2007 at 10:02 PM..
Old 02-04-2007, 09:58 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #13 (permalink)
Registered User
 
89turbocabmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 1,253
Quote:
Originally posted by Larry Ratcliff

Since I am new to boost from any source I was wondering how much of an advantage the larger ports and valve sizes would be. For that matter would a varioram intake make a good turbo intake?

They'd be a great advantage for getting really high horsepower! The varioram intake though is quite tall from my recollection and would make it more difficult to get a good size intercooler in place I think.

Of course you'll also have to decide on an aftermarket ECU, lots of choices there.
Old 02-04-2007, 10:10 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #14 (permalink)
Registered User
 
WydRyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,563
Larry, you really need to chat with Todd Knighton as he's done many of these conversions on Varioram motors. This is where my knowledge ends as I have no experience with those motors.

You'd probably need a Protomotive 993 ECU for a Varioram motor to take full advantage of that capability... Todd is your man
__________________
Merv
'89 911 Turbo Cab
Protomotive MAP ECU, Twin Plugged Heads, GT2-EVO CAMs, 3.3L fully finned P&C's, ARP fasteners, C2T head gaskets, Titanium Retainers, Turbo spec valves, springs & guides, 964 splash valves, GT35R BB turbo, GSF Stainless Headers, Magnaflow Exhaust, Full bay Intercooler, TiAL 46mm w/gate, TiAL 50mm BOV, Apexi AVC-R EBC, SPEC Stage3+ Clutch kit, Crane CDI Ignition
Old 02-04-2007, 10:36 PM
  Pelican Parts Technical Article Directory    Reply With Quote #15 (permalink)
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

 


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:08 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2016 Pelican Parts - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page
 

DTO Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.