![]() |
|
|
|
ALEX P
|
915 to G50 conversion on '85 911 - What's needed guide
I’m running a 3.2 chassis with a 964 3.6 engine mated up to a 915 gearbox. The gearbox has done around 120-130k miles without rebuild so with the age, mileage and the additional loads placed upon it from the 3.6 conversion I did around 10k miles ago, needless to say it is becoming pretty stretched, crunching more and more and generally worn. It has always had a factory short shift which possibly exaggerates this and more recently a Seine gate shifter. Ideally I would have dealt with it when I did the 3.6 conversion but time and money constraints did not allow.
Now I’m not going to get drawn into any debates over 915 v G50 because it has all been discussed far too many times before. What I would say is that I have owned both and personally feel that the G50, albeit slightly heavier with more complications such as hydraulic operation does allow for a bit more clumsiness, faster shifts and is arguably a slightly more robust unit. I am trying to compile a rough argument against rebuilding my 915 verses swapping it for a G50 unit from the ’87-’89 Carrera. Trawling through many old threads, the thread that stands out the most for good information is this: Fitting 6 speed G50 to '89 Carrera And the thread with the most amount of promise but eventually fizzled out was this: (Really wish you’d carried on with that one Blackbyrd!) 915 to G50 Conversion on my Euro 3.2 911 SC This for sale details some of the parts with photos that need to be modded: FS: G50 Shortened Bell Housing/Main Shaft/Fork All I want to do is try to seek some answers from people who have either done the conversion or have knowledge of it without cluttering up anyone else’s thread so that I can decide whether to start hunting for a G50-00. I would like to retain the torsion bar set up instead of going to coilovers and would really like to not have to cut into the torsion tube. So basically a nut and bolt conversion (apart from the shortening to the ‘box). I have read that some do have to and some don’t which always puzzles me as I thought it would be a bit more of a black or white answer! As far as a parts list goes, I’ve figured it will need: G50-00 Gearbox (Not sure if this is the only G50 Variant that fits but appears to be the shortest) G50 Pedals and master cylinder (possible aftermarket – Tilton?) 3 x Hydraulic lines G50 Shifter assembly G50 front mount / adaptor to 915 chassis (Patrick Motorsport?) Reservoir and line Slave Cylinder G50 starter motor Clutch kit Flywheel (Patrick Motorsport?) And the work involved other than fitting the above is: Shortening the bellhousing of the G50 by the 29mm or so – Are there any threads or info out there on the best way to do this? Shortening the main shaft of the G50 by the same amount - Are there any threads or info out there on the best way to do this? Do you have to completely dismantle the G50 to remove the main shaft to shorten it? I've seen people quote $1000 for the work which seems a lot for simply doing the machining work so presumably the rest is in the labout to strip and reassemble the 'box? Any advice on offer or anything that I have missed out there would be great as even if I don’t do it and live with/rebuild my crunchy 915 - It may be useful to others ![]() |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 71
|
Alex, have you had a look at brummie's thread on impact bumpers? He changed his sc to a g50. A lovely job too, if I remember correctly.
|
||
![]() |
|
ALEX P
|
Quote:
Brummie's G50-into-an-SC transplant - Gruppe IB: The Hot Rods - Impact Bumpers What he's done is fantastic but it's a lot of work - If I press the button on this I was aiming/hoping to do no real chassis mods at all otherwise I may reluctantly swing back towards rebuilding the 915. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
I see no mention of an LSD. IMHO, you'd really appreciate a 60/40 LSD set to about 80 ft/lbs in that car. Best money I've ever spent on either of my transmissions.
A Guard Transmission (GT) clutch LSD is probably the very best available, but pretty spendy in the UK with import duty/taxes. The Gripper guys told me they've made G50 LSDs before (and will again if asked), they just don't list them on their web site. However, with a Gripper, you need someone who knows how to tune one to set it up for you for your intended use, as well as to install it. Because those guys just make diffs. Mike Bainbridge has worked with those (Gripper) diffs extensively. You may still have to at least cut the cover away to get the extra half inch you need. My '77 did. There's a one photo on this thread that'll give you an "oh, OK" moment: Verify a G50 is shortened? The welded cover is just a welded cover. It's OK to cut some of that away. Some cars don't need it; I've heard of earlier ('74) and later (SCs) with G50's that didn't need this, no-one seems to know quite why some do and some don't.... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Patrick Motorsports make an extended, full-length hose. Or a short extension hose (just source new stock hoses locally). PMS also make a coupler extension. They can provide a full package of parts/fiddly bits. Quote:
Fabulous stuff - you'll not regret that choice. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Unless you really want to go DIY. Basically, you're just converting to a 76-77 spring-centered 930 clutch (factory friction plate good for around 500 ft/lbs, so you don't even need "trick" plates like Center Farce or whatever), but you do need to get the flywheel and bolts, TO bearing right. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
BTW, even though 915 rebuilds have been edging up for years, G50 boxes are way more expensive to go through. A G50 with 120,000 may actually need a fair bit if the spec is "replace wear parts if questionable". But then I expect to be stuffing over 500HP through mine. Quote:
PM me if you aren't clear how much all this costs, or need more details. Frankly, with "only" a 3.6, I think I'd put the car on an aggressive diet, build up a couple of serious 915's with LSDs, internal oiling (spray bars) and stiff cover plates/bearing retainers etc, uprate the stub axles so you can use G50 axles. And still have multiple buckets of cash left over instead... Unless you drive it seriously hard (like competitively), it probably just doesn't make sense for that power level.
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. Last edited by spuggy; 11-07-2014 at 07:12 AM.. |
||||||||||||
![]() |
|
ALEX P
|
Hey spuggy, firstly, big thanks for taking the time to answer my questions in such good detail, it is much appreciated.
Quote:
Quote:
So if you cut the torsion bar cover away as in the photo below then do you just leave it open? Does it have any adverse affect on the strength? If it literally is just cutting a window in the tube and treating it to some rust prevention then that’s not too bad but didn’t really want to start breaking out the welded as it always seems a slippery slope! ![]() Quote:
I think for most parts I would find a ’87-’89 G50 car being parted out. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
The thing that worries me about rebuilding the 915 is a friend recently rebuilt his at Mike Bainbridges and did some sensible upgrades, LSD, spray bars, stiffening etc and do do that sort of job I would be looking at $6500-8000 and I'd want to be pretty damn sure that I'd be very satisfied at the end of it. Obviously buying a used G50 is also rolling the dice in a big way and as you say they're expensive to rebuild. It's kinda why I'm trying to do a side by side comparison to help me make my mind up! ![]() |
|||||||||
![]() |
|
Chain fence eating turbo
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 9,127
|
The G50 will handle well over a 1000 hp with a billet side cover. A 915 seems to be strained past 350.
Point is, in stock form in a naturally aspirated 3.2, the G50 will have never been pushed to its limit. Not even close. So, as long as the fluid was changed properly and the owner didn't abuse the synchros, I wouldn't worry about a used G50. It'd be worth the gamble. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
gearhead
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Loverland, CO
Posts: 23,541
|
A used G50 these days is a giant question mark. You might be in for $1000 worth of synchros. 3/4 slider/hub assembly is another $1000. Factor a $3000 repair bill into your budget just in case.
My G50 LSD is almost $3000. Don't know what a Gripper costs. It is less. |
||
![]() |
|
ALEX P
|
Ok, so I had a reply from Patrick Motorsports and the conversion parts from them came out to $3670 broken down as below:
$40 Engine case to g'box studs $285 Mount adaptor $90 ARB/Sway bar adaptor $690 Hydraulic conversion kit inc reservoir, brackets, hoses, sleeves, clutch m/c, slave cyl, lines etc $225 Shift rod adaptor $650 Flywheel $22.50 Flywheel bolts $1400 Clutch set $245 Starter ring gear $22.50 Bolts They also sell the guide tube for $130 - lots of info here: Transmission > Porsche G50 SBH (Short Bell Housing) By Patrick Motorsports Porsche & Mid Engine Performance Specialists I alsodiscussed it with an engine & gearbox specialist in the UK who thought the modification work to the the gearbox would probably be around £2000 / $3150. This is to deliver him a gearbox and for him to strip it, carry out the machiing work and rebuild it. Anything worn or broken whilst in there would obviously be extra. So as a quick tott up for the assumed total: $3670 Patrick Motorsports conversion parts $3150 Gearbox modification $4000 (approx) for G50 Gearbox $1000 (approx) Pedals, shift rod & sundries It looks to be approximately $12,000 / £7700 for the conversion + a boat load of work + the unknown theoretical expense of a used G50. all of a sudden I'm developing a new love for my 915! I simply couldn't justify that sort of expense. On the plus side it does give a new justification for dropping some coin into a killer 915 build ![]() Hopefully this is of some use to anyone else considering the same conversion. |
||
![]() |
|
Brando
|
Crap!
__________________
Turbo powa! 1977 911s. it's cool |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
cheaper to buy a tub
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
What is the difference between the 915 and G50 shifter, is it really necessary to use a G50 shifter?
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Peter, yes I know the difference between the 2 boxes.
I like the 915 too, but even with a good 915 you need to pause between gears and going into 1st from second with any speed can't be done without brute force. With a bit of torque, they do brake if you're not careful... But why in a G50 conversion do you need to change the shifter? What is the difference in the shift pattern? If the change is really a must, can you use a 964/993 shifter in an early tub or do you need a 87-88 shifter?
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Glorious Pac NW
Posts: 4,184
|
Completely different console, shift pattern & shift coupler rod.
The 915 shift pattern has reverse straight back from 5th - if I recall correctly, there's a lockout mechanism in the console itself? - where the G50 is left/forward for reverse, like an early pattern dogleg 1st. Quote:
__________________
'77 S with '78 930 power and a few other things. |
||
![]() |
|
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Franklin, TN
Posts: 5,889
|
Yes, the change is a must. Reverse is outside the pattern to the left. The g50 springs are internal to the transaxle and not in the shifter like with The 915. I am sure the throws are different too.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
aha, reverse!
So there is no springs or lock out in the G50 console? Just a simple linkage pulling/pushing/twisting the shift rod, like on the 944?
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
No springs or anything inside the G50 shifter. Like Scott said it's gating and spring centering is all contained inside the transmission
FS: G50 Shifter and rod
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I think I could get a 944 shifter dirt cheep and modify that, moving it back and up.
__________________
Magnus 911 Silver Targa -77, 3.2 -84 with custom ITBs and EFI. 911T Coupe -69, 3.6, G50, "RSR", track day. 924 -79 Rat Rod EFI/Turbo 375whp@1.85bar. 931 -79 under total restoration. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
any more additional information ever come from this thread?
|
||
![]() |
|
Get off my lawn!
|
Like most major modifications, it just does not make economic sense.
Sell the current car and get a G-50 car. You will be much better off. Just my opinion, it is your money and time. Do what you want.
__________________
Glen 49 Year member of the Porsche Club of America 1985 911 Carrera; 2017 Macan 1986 El Camino with Fuel Injected 350 Crate Engine My Motto: I will never be too old to have a happy childhood! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Around Boston
Posts: 2,027
|
Long shot but.
Would a 996 transmission work for this conversion.? My 3.8/ 915. Will eventually need something. I'm following this thread closely |
||
![]() |
|