![]() |
|
|
|
Bye, Bye.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
|
Why or why not a C4?
Guys, I need pros and cons...let er rip!!!
__________________
Elvis has left the building. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Viera FL
Posts: 5,642
|
Off the top of my head:
Pros: go around corners and handle much better Cons: more maintenance intensive, slightly more difficult to work on Somewhat slower than a C2 AFJuvat
__________________
Es geht nicht darum wie schnell man faehrt, sondern wie gut man schnell fahren kann. Ihr Brunnen der nutzlosen Porsche Information |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
pros: nice quiet smooth luxury ride, wife can drive it
cons: heavy, ugly, lame
__________________
jasper 2002 996 - arctic silver - PSS9, H&R sways,X51 oil pan, console delete, AASCO liteweight flywheel, gbox detent, RS motor mounts, 997 shifter. Great car. past: another 2002 996 and a 1978 SC with-webers-cams-etc. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
From what I have read, the 4wd technology has come a long way. The 946 c4 is much different than a 996 c4. Also, from what I have read, if you live in a mostly dry area or want a track car, get a C2. If you live in a wet/snowy area, a C4 might be a good idea.
__________________
Alan Jackson 77 911S 3.2 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Slovenia/Monaco
Posts: 132
|
You wanna 4 wheel drive buy Audi or Subaru. 911 4s are for retired ppl that dont have reflexes as sharp as use to. Just my thought
__________________
"88" carrera "02" tt roadster (wife) sold "04" jaguar x-type "04" kawasaki zx10r "05" yamaha mayesty "05" A3 sportback |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: AUSTRALIA
Posts: 3,492
|
Ask the same question on the 964 board if you have not already. Then buy the newest 911 Porsche you can afford and you will not regret it.
__________________
Audi B7 S4 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Sweden
Posts: 5,911
|
Quote:
964 C4 has much more advanced 4WD than 996 C4. While 996 C4 has just visco-fluid coupling between front and rear axle, 964 C4 has intricate electro-hydraulic system that's loosely based on 959 one. It was subsequently replaced by cheaper visco-coupling for mainenance and cost reasons.
__________________
Thank you for your time, |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orchard Park,NY
Posts: 65
|
As a C4 owner I find it too easy to drive fast. Having raced formula vee and previously owned a 1983 911SC, I like the "seat of the pants feel". The C4 is very civilized. I bought the C4 when the SC was totaled. I was looking for RWD 964 but couldn't pass up the deal on the C4 Cabrio. I'm now considering trading it for a C2 Coupe of equal value +/- to do DE's without a roll bar since the formula vee has been sold.
__________________
1990 C4 Cabrio 1983 911SC (RIP) 1997 Expedition EB 2004 EXPLORER ( Momma's Car) Zink Z-12 FV ( sold ) 2005 Cub Cadet 1046 |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
Re: Why or why not a C4?
Quote:
Like the other guys said, the different C4 cars are not only different in age, but in mechanicals as well. The first C4 uses a complex (translation: expensive) electrically managed awd system. Sure the 964 C4 is cheaper to buy, but may be much more expensive to maintain in the event of a major service on the AWD system. The 993 and later cars use a simpler system and I believe it's said to be a bit more transparent than the original 964 C4's operation. I believe the 993 and later cars also did away with the locking differential? The 964 has a button you can push to lock the rear diff. for better traction (if you're stuck), but I don't think it's used for cruising around. Just use it to get out of the mud, then unlock the diff.? ![]()
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" Last edited by KTL; 02-09-2005 at 06:09 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 778
|
I think the locking CENTER diff on 964s works at 40MPH or less - 50/50 split. Normally 80r/20f I think.
Theoretically, you can yank out the center shaft, front diff, and front CVs and you're now a C2 with some extra control systems on board. Swap in a C2 or manual steering rack and you even better. That's what I would consider doing if faced with a giant $$$ AWD repair bill.
__________________
Project935 Tube Chassis Turbo RSR/934/935 racer - SOLD in 6/'06 Gruppe B #101 What's next? |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orchard Park,NY
Posts: 65
|
Not that easy, abs and pdas systems are independant creates all kinds of chaos. Better off just buying a C2. If it were that easy I would have done it.
__________________
1990 C4 Cabrio 1983 911SC (RIP) 1997 Expedition EB 2004 EXPLORER ( Momma's Car) Zink Z-12 FV ( sold ) 2005 Cub Cadet 1046 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
supposedly one of the reasons they got rid of the 964 style C4 drivetrain is to reduce the understeer found in that model, which had greater torque biasing toward the front in a nominal situation than a 993 or 996.
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Bye, Bye.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
|
Interesting thoughts....thanks guys. The C4 in question is a 1990. I have been told the C4 goes through tires very fast. Also, I drove the car yesterday. I took a big curve at a decent speed and found the rear end to be a little loose for my taste. Surprised, as I thought an all wheel drive wouldn't be loose at all. It actually felt like the rear wheel broke its bead and came off the rim! By the way, the tires suck...Kumhos.
![]()
__________________
Elvis has left the building. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
can you throttle steer a C4? Seems it would be tougher than a C2.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oakland Twp., Michigan
Posts: 279
|
I had a 97C4S and another PCA member has a C2S. I couldn't tell the difference when drivng them both hard.
__________________
2001 Twin Turbo |
||
![]() |
|
Bye, Bye.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 6,167
|
Quote:
__________________
Elvis has left the building. |
||
![]() |
|
Schleprock
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfort IL USA
Posts: 16,639
|
I agree on the more sporting nature of the 993 C4. I don't own one, but the 97 Carrera 4S that I drove didn't feel like your typical all wheel drive car.
Quite easy to make the rear end step out, goofing around at low speeds. Might be a different story at higher speeds. I can say with certainty that the C4S in no way behaves like my AWD Laser- lotsa understeer and difficult to make the rear end step out under hard accel. Tail wagging was not hard to do with the Porsche.
__________________
Kevin L '86 Carrera "Larry" |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: City of Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,374
|
so I guess what whe really need is reports from people who have driven hard or owned both a 964 C4 and an older 911. Too bad I'm not one of those, so I can't help!
Kumho Ecsta MX are good tires, and Kumho ecsta supra 712s are no pilot sports, but they are very good for their price.
__________________
Andy |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Mid-life crisis, could be anywhere
Posts: 10,382
|
I have a 4 and can't even detect that its there. A 993 only puts 5% of the power to the front during normal driving. When the computer detects front wheel slip, it starts to add more.
__________________
'95 993 C4 Cabriolet Bunch of motorcycles |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Orchard Park,NY
Posts: 65
|
From what I understand the 964C4 is something like 61% rear and 39% front power, thus the understeer. Porsche supposedly designed it that way because of liability. Understeer and you hit the guide rail, your fault "driving too fast". Oversteer and the ass comes around and you hit the guide rail, their fault "bad engineering". Damm lawyers!
__________________
1990 C4 Cabrio 1983 911SC (RIP) 1997 Expedition EB 2004 EXPLORER ( Momma's Car) Zink Z-12 FV ( sold ) 2005 Cub Cadet 1046 |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|