![]() |
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6
|
![]()
hey guys, i have a porsche 1.7 but i want to add more power to the car cause i live 7,545ft by the sea level, so i ran out of power....how can i increase it? adding double carburetors maybe 40idf how much top speed i'll get and the 0-60 will reduce? thanks.
|
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
At that altitude you would need a low-pressure turbocharger system or a very small shot of nitrous oxide. You need more oxygen in the cylinder, bigger carbs cannot really give you that.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6
|
ok thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 926
|
Quote:
Mark from Original Customs in Sonoma is currently working on a bolt on Turbo Kit for the 1.7L. That would probably be your best bet at that altitude ... ![]()
__________________
>> 1970, 914-6, 3.6L (Conversion) >> 1970, 914-6, #374 (Original) >> 1975/73, 914 Limo (Custom) |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 7,269
|
Add a lot of displacement and some more compression. Or, a turbo.
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
find a 914 2.0 engine? pretty cheap these days.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
In the shop at Pelican
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 10,459
|
At that altitude? turbo.
adding dual carbs to a stock 914 engine will make LESS horsepower than stock. You need to build the engine for the carbs, i.e. camshaft, heads and exhaust. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 893
|
Your engine is a D-jetronic . Your option is replace the fuel system with carbs,cam and a header,
For maybe 15-20 hp gain if that, expensive. The cheapest alternative is plumb nos lines for a dry nitrous setup.then increase the mixture adjustment for a richer mixture for a total gain of maybe 20 hp. D-jetronic can be set to run on the rich side. As long as you keep the minimum on the nitrous you will be ok. I've known several people who have done this with safe and notice results. And btw the is the cheapest way to get a few more ponies. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,347
|
Subie WRX conversion ?
![]()
__________________
1970 914-6 Past: 2000 Boxster 2.7, 1987 944, 1987 924S 1978 911SC, 1976 914 2.0, 1970 914 w/2056 |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Quote:
Or better yet the Subaru WRX engine suggested above (turbocharged of course).
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 893
|
We are looking at ease and cost effectiveness. Water cooled swaps don't really work. I know, I
Have done several of them. If the car never came with a radiator, it should stay that way. If you are going to go through the trouble of adding a turbo for a 1.7, cost wise it is not worth it. He seems more interested in performance in which case he should look at a modded 2 L or a 911 implant which is what I am doing. If it is the lack of performance,he should have it checked out. Am I missing something here. Is it 7,545 ft above sea level in which case running slightly lean due to higher altitude can be easily solved with adjustments on D-Jetronic. And if it is 0-60 time improvement he seeks then NOS is the answer either with a wet or dry setup. |
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
He would run rich with fuel injection systems that do not account for the decreased pressure at altitude.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 3,347
|
I think the altitude is the issue for the OP no? Therefore, a Turbo likely IS the better answer than simple displacement increases.
That said Stock 1.7 0-60 was around 13-14 seconds (80hp) Stock 2.0 0-60 was around 9.0 seconds (95hp) 914-6 0-60 was around 8.0 seconds (110hp)
__________________
1970 914-6 Past: 2000 Boxster 2.7, 1987 944, 1987 924S 1978 911SC, 1976 914 2.0, 1970 914 w/2056 |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 18
|
009 distributor, with petronix ignition to start with. Also a more powerful coil with larger gap. Get a K&N filter. This'll get you to about $200. The other thing to consider is smaller tires will give you more torque, but lower top speed ( do you really need to go 140?) and maybe higher fuel consumption, but a turbo would raise that anyway. High ratio rockers will help, too. More than that and you're talking some serious head portiing, cam replacement, turbo, higher cylinder pressure, etc.
|
||
![]() |
|
Max Sluiter
|
Or make the car lighter. That is the best option.
__________________
1971 911S, 2.7RS spec MFI engine, suspension mods, lightened Suspension by Rebel Racing, Serviced by TLG Auto, Brakes by PMB Performance |
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Rate This Thread | |
|