![]() |
|
|
|
Registered
|
The 'Well, I bought it' R11S Trans Failure - UPDATE!
Originally failed at 18.935 miles
64,910 miles later. ![]() ![]() Hello gentlemen. It's been a long while since I've actively participated though not due to a lack of want, but from an ongoing cardiac issue which, as some of you may recall - I underwent a triple bypass procedure back on 11/06/2012. I've had a couple of related issues - fortunately, all is A-Okay for now. Enough of that - Let's jump right into my long term oil head esmirspacer evaluation. Though not by majority consensus, a few pelicans, ( I admit I am one) - felt spacing the clutch hub for full clutch hub/input shaft spline engagement would result in an temporary-at-best fix as many were of the opinion that concentric indexing was/is the root cause of this boggle, and perhaps - this may very well be the case - on an unknown number of machines. My particular machine, however, failed dramatically at the 18,935 mile mark and has subsequently accumulated some 64,910 miles post spacer/input shaft retrofit/replacement. Now - bear in mind, as I had indicated in prior posts, my machine has been mercilessly flogged on an almost daily basis for tens of thousands of miles by numerous riders in a veritable plethora of dynamic scenario's ranging from hour after hour of heavy commuter traffic situations to several all out closed course track days and no less than three cross country L.A. to Boston and back trips - with the specific intent to expose any weakness of the esmirspacer clutch hub modification. Basically, I volunteered my machine as an evaluation guinea pig in order to glean valuable empirical data providing useful information to the oilhead community. Yes, the transmission bearing did fail - however, considering the terrific amount of abuse imposed by such rigorous stress testing - the now proven long term durability of components, particularly the hub spacer allowing full engagement of available spline area is impressive - So much so that I sourced another option which addresses this well known potentially catastrophic BMW engineering shortfall and here it is: ![]() ![]() Correct dimension fully broached hub. NO spacer required! Exceptional Quality - Made in Japan (not China) by an well known automotive friction disc manufacturer. For those interested - I have only a very limited number of these available. $189 free ship anywhere in the states. Anywhere else on the planet contact me. J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered Agitator
|
Was this made specifically for the 1100S or is it a stock item for something else?
Glad to hear you're doing well. |
||
![]() |
|
encantado
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: 13413 / 92660
Posts: 207
|
thanks for checking back in. your original thread was one of the most descriptive "splines lol" stories and the difference in your wear patterns is night and day--really sobering actually. i'm considering buying some of these puppies for when mine wears out...
like sgoodwin i am interested in knowing more about the mystery japanese source which trans bearing failed? if it was the one closest to the clutch unit i would wonder about extra loads on it from the heavier clutch disc spinning on the input shaft closer to the bearing
__________________
"It’s what makes life interesting, finding the balance between cigarettes and tofu." |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 7
|
It looks like it was the front intermediate shaft bearing. At least, that is the one that broke through the casting.
|
||
![]() |
|
Brent
|
ohh ohh can i have one.
I can pp money |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 77
|
Thanks J.S.! I'm thinking of doing this to my BCR over next winter. Please PM me with your info... Will PP be OK? I'll be ordering one up in few weeks.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered
|
Quote:
J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
|||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Cruz, Ca.
Posts: 240
|
I'll take one. Please send PayPal info.
__________________
Terry 2016 Cayman 2004 R1150S |
||
![]() |
|
Jon
|
It is for the Sachs or OEM clutch disc correct? Would like one too. Please PM your PP info. and thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: SEQUIM, WA
Posts: 68
|
If you have one left I would like one as well.
|
||
![]() |
|
![]() |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 19
|
If you sell out of first batch, will you order more?
How many is "very limited" 5, 50, 500? Thanks! |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
Several sold - 2 remaining. 20 more on the way - which should be available by the end of next month if not sooner. Stay tuned. Also, check back as I'll be posting more photos as well as additional pertinent details later this evening. J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 6
|
Hello Jozef,
Quick question, would this work on my 2002 GS1150? Thanks, Ron |
||
![]() |
|
Brent
|
ok I ppd the money thanks
|
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
•R850R '99-'04 •R1100S '97-'05 •R1150RS '00-'04 •R1150RT '02-'04 •R1150R / ROCKSTER '00-'04 •R1150GS '98-'03 •R1150GSA '01-'05 •R1200C '96-'04 •R1200CL '01-'04 •R1200 MONTAUK '02-'04 J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Got it - Now, all I require is shipping info/address.
(Folks, I appreciate you sending funds via PP "friends/family" - however, this option does not allow me to print out shipping labels nor is there a shipping address shown in transaction details.) I'll gladly absorb the small convenience fee imposed by PayPal. ![]() J.S. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Here are several additional photos for your collective perusal detailing various specification differences between two popular (O.E.M Sachs/Siebenrock) clutch discs and the newly offered 'superschiebe' (scheibe = disc).
*note - I employed my newly acquired Samsung smartphone in obtaining these photos. Optical deception is at work here as the left and right discs are identical in diameter. The Siebenrock disc, however - is significantly smaller. The disc order from left - O.E.M Sachs, Siebenrock Basic Plus, 'Superscheibe' ![]() Interestingly, I discovered the highly-touted-by-many Siebenrock disc showing a dimensionally smaller circumference/diameter specification - in addition to a lower friction material surface area value vs. both the O.E.M. Sachs and 'Superscheibe' discs which are virtually identical in this regard as evidenced by the photos below. O.E.M Sachs = Approx. 164mm ![]() 'Superscheibe'= Approx. 164mm ![]() Siebenrock 'basic plus'= Approx. 160mm ![]() More info coming tomorrow J.S. Last edited by Jozef Schumann; 06-15-2017 at 12:56 AM.. |
||
![]() |
|
Registered
|
Quote:
I should add the price quoted is an introductory price and will most assuredly be going up in the future though I'm hoping to keep the price point for at least a couple of months. Quite a bargain considering alternative options and the inherent ailment being addressed. J.S. |
||
![]() |
|